I'm building myself a Short Heavy Tactical Rifle.
Rem 700 20" 308 Win. in an AICS Stock
Was going to save some money for now and go with the Nikon Buckmaster at Cabelas, but then I looked through the Monarch and the difference literally looked "Night and Day" difference. It was soooo much brighter and sharper.
So here's my real question. With the setup im building does it make more sense to go with the 2.5-10x scope, or the 4-16x?
In practicality it will be used mainly for benchrest shooting, but it will be my only hunting rifle for a bit so it will serve that purpose too. My next rifle will be a 260 or 7mm-08, you can keep that into consideration.
Rem 700 20" 308 Win. in an AICS Stock
Was going to save some money for now and go with the Nikon Buckmaster at Cabelas, but then I looked through the Monarch and the difference literally looked "Night and Day" difference. It was soooo much brighter and sharper.
So here's my real question. With the setup im building does it make more sense to go with the 2.5-10x scope, or the 4-16x?
In practicality it will be used mainly for benchrest shooting, but it will be my only hunting rifle for a bit so it will serve that purpose too. My next rifle will be a 260 or 7mm-08, you can keep that into consideration.