This made me laugh out loud,
What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalized for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website explains:
Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?
Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. Is this feasible?
www.theguardian.com
What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalized for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website explains:
And importantly it adds:The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes.
Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields.