From various threads in this forum, it appears that SK and Lapua ammo lube may be the same slippery frog snot.
However, when I was testing ammo on the Cz457 and Bergara b14r, I noticed something strange.
I used SK Std + and SK Rifle Match as the "seasoning" rounds before switching to Lapua when shooting for groups.
I noticed that there were POI shifts for the first 2 or 3 rounds on both rifles when switching from SK to Lapua.
This was the same when my son saddled up to shoot groups. No noticeable carbon ring on bore scope and no cooling period between the different ammo shots.
My questions:
1. Are the lube same for both ammo? They feel similar and both are from the Nammo manufacturing group and both made in Germany (their website says that Lapua rimfire ammo are made in Schonebeck, GE). Could they be using slightly different lube formulations?
2. Could other factors such as the bullet shape, crimp, or the length of brass affect the first few shots of a string when switching ammo? (The SK ammo is 1 year older than the Lapua, but both were stored in a cool humidity controlled area)
3. Anyone else experience anything similar when shooting SK and Lapua?
pfffft, here I thought I could save a few shekels by seasoning with the cheaper SK before shooting the ever shrinking stash of lot tested Lapua...
Thanks for you comments/help in advance.
Life's hard, but it's harder when I am a poor.
YMMV, happy shooting
However, when I was testing ammo on the Cz457 and Bergara b14r, I noticed something strange.
I used SK Std + and SK Rifle Match as the "seasoning" rounds before switching to Lapua when shooting for groups.
I noticed that there were POI shifts for the first 2 or 3 rounds on both rifles when switching from SK to Lapua.
This was the same when my son saddled up to shoot groups. No noticeable carbon ring on bore scope and no cooling period between the different ammo shots.
My questions:
1. Are the lube same for both ammo? They feel similar and both are from the Nammo manufacturing group and both made in Germany (their website says that Lapua rimfire ammo are made in Schonebeck, GE). Could they be using slightly different lube formulations?
2. Could other factors such as the bullet shape, crimp, or the length of brass affect the first few shots of a string when switching ammo? (The SK ammo is 1 year older than the Lapua, but both were stored in a cool humidity controlled area)
3. Anyone else experience anything similar when shooting SK and Lapua?
pfffft, here I thought I could save a few shekels by seasoning with the cheaper SK before shooting the ever shrinking stash of lot tested Lapua...
Thanks for you comments/help in advance.
Life's hard, but it's harder when I am a poor.
YMMV, happy shooting