There has been a lot of discussion about the SAP Sling and the FTW sling. While they both look very good, I'm having trouble deciding between the two. I've been using a Vickers VCAS sling, which happens to have a loop that sort-of works for sling shooting, but is not designed for that, so it's effectively just a carry sling, unless you’re willing to dedicate a lot of stage time to setting it up, in which case it can be marginally used as a shooting sling. FAR from idea.
I think anyone shopping for a sling has watched these:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzjYQgFWcnc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LybQKzL_Hzk
Both the SAP Sling and the FTW sling seem to have been very well thought-out by some very capable shooters, which is great. But I want to decide between the two. I've eliminated most of the other options, so here is my list of differences, as I see it....
* Elastic Bungee. I really like the bungee on the FTW sling. I'm sure it makes the gun easier and more comfortable to carry, but I'd imagine a carry pad over the SAP sling would be about the same thing. What I like the elastic for is for keeping the rear leg of the sling (rearward of the arm cuff) from getting restrictive when using the arm cuff in positional shooting. It also gives you a lot of “play” when using the sling for a semi-supported (non-cuffed) shot. Definitely a plus for the FTW.
* Hardware. It seems like both use very nice hardware. The “front” end of the cuff on the SAP seems to rely on the plastic buckle for tightening, but I’m not 100% sure I’m seeing this right. Maybe a slight edge here to the FTW, for using the same style metal tensioner in both adjusting positions.
* Clip-out. Both slings use a buckle, but they seem to have a very different philosophy about the use of this buckle. The SAP sling puts the buckle as part of the cuff, giving you a very quick and easy escape from the cuff during a stage without releasing the sling functionality. This is perfect if you need to start the stage slung up, but need to release it for movement or subsequent shooting. The FTW buckle is very different. Being behind the cuff, it allows you to release the sling into two pieces, running the cuff and forward mount with a full “sling” (ie attachment point in the rear). I think the SAP functionality here is more useful, and probably the biggest different between the slings. Big win SAP.
* Sling “Tail”. The FTW cuff, as it’s tightened, creates a tail, which hangs in front of the shooter. I could see this being a PITA. The SAP sling puts excess cuff length into the front length of the sling. I could see this also being a PITA, since tightening the cuff would loosen the front leg of the sling, meaning you always need to pull both adjustments. With the FTW sling, if you had the front length properly set, you could pull the cuff tight and get to shooting without touching the front adjuster. Kind of a toss-up here.
* Patch. The SAP has a nice patch on the cuff, which, while it may seem insignificant, gives a very easy reference point to make sure you sling up the right way. Anyone who has had to sling up on the clock can appreciate this. (In fact, in the R3 review, he slings it up backwards, and deals with a twist in the sling while he’s demonstrating the cuffed function of the sling.) Of course, I could certainly find a patch, even a piece of bright colored tape, to replicate it’s functionality on the FTW sling. Very slight win for the SAP.
What do you guys think of these points? Has anyone used both who can comment on some of these differences?
Thanks.
Scott Whitehead
I think anyone shopping for a sling has watched these:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzjYQgFWcnc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LybQKzL_Hzk
Both the SAP Sling and the FTW sling seem to have been very well thought-out by some very capable shooters, which is great. But I want to decide between the two. I've eliminated most of the other options, so here is my list of differences, as I see it....
* Elastic Bungee. I really like the bungee on the FTW sling. I'm sure it makes the gun easier and more comfortable to carry, but I'd imagine a carry pad over the SAP sling would be about the same thing. What I like the elastic for is for keeping the rear leg of the sling (rearward of the arm cuff) from getting restrictive when using the arm cuff in positional shooting. It also gives you a lot of “play” when using the sling for a semi-supported (non-cuffed) shot. Definitely a plus for the FTW.
* Hardware. It seems like both use very nice hardware. The “front” end of the cuff on the SAP seems to rely on the plastic buckle for tightening, but I’m not 100% sure I’m seeing this right. Maybe a slight edge here to the FTW, for using the same style metal tensioner in both adjusting positions.
* Clip-out. Both slings use a buckle, but they seem to have a very different philosophy about the use of this buckle. The SAP sling puts the buckle as part of the cuff, giving you a very quick and easy escape from the cuff during a stage without releasing the sling functionality. This is perfect if you need to start the stage slung up, but need to release it for movement or subsequent shooting. The FTW buckle is very different. Being behind the cuff, it allows you to release the sling into two pieces, running the cuff and forward mount with a full “sling” (ie attachment point in the rear). I think the SAP functionality here is more useful, and probably the biggest different between the slings. Big win SAP.
* Sling “Tail”. The FTW cuff, as it’s tightened, creates a tail, which hangs in front of the shooter. I could see this being a PITA. The SAP sling puts excess cuff length into the front length of the sling. I could see this also being a PITA, since tightening the cuff would loosen the front leg of the sling, meaning you always need to pull both adjustments. With the FTW sling, if you had the front length properly set, you could pull the cuff tight and get to shooting without touching the front adjuster. Kind of a toss-up here.
* Patch. The SAP has a nice patch on the cuff, which, while it may seem insignificant, gives a very easy reference point to make sure you sling up the right way. Anyone who has had to sling up on the clock can appreciate this. (In fact, in the R3 review, he slings it up backwards, and deals with a twist in the sling while he’s demonstrating the cuffed function of the sling.) Of course, I could certainly find a patch, even a piece of bright colored tape, to replicate it’s functionality on the FTW sling. Very slight win for the SAP.
What do you guys think of these points? Has anyone used both who can comment on some of these differences?
Thanks.
Scott Whitehead