I started listening to Joe Rogan's podcast last night with Elon Musk that occured on Halloween. Something that struck me was Elon saying that Soros figured out that you didn't have to change the law, you just had to effect how the law was enforced to get the change you wanted. And Soros could fund a LOT of prosecuting attorneys that would enforce the law in the way he wanted, or not enforce the law the way he wanted.
So in the case of the topic of discussions case, I wonder if we were to do some digging, who funded that prosecutors campaign. And what if this case was designed to set precedence for use on other cases.
When they talk about grand juries handing out indictments on something like this, I really have to wonder if the prosecutor designed the evidence, and presented it in such a way to get the desired results from the jury, or if the jury was hand selected to hand him the indictments that he wants without hearing any true evidence in whatever case he chooses. Either way, it's not a good look, and i'm very confident that the corruption in this country is a cancer that is spreading.
Branden