Many people have postulated that the reason that the powers-that-be have been so insistent on the vaccination of westerners is to put a national digital vaccine pass in place much in the way that outlawing private firearm sales is a predecessor to a national firearms database. The next step, so argue, is to piggyback a social credit system onto the preexisting digital vaccine pass. In order to see how that is working out, here are two reasonable videos of China's social credit system.
Toward the end of the second video, the narrator states that the SCS is to change "the actions and thoughts of the Chinese population, not through violence or force but through the process of gradual normative behavioral change." Taking away the ability of someone to travel, have a good job, or purchase goods by disrupting their free will doesn't feel gradual or normative, but instead feels kind of like force.
The social credit system is typically associated with individuals. The business or corporate version of the social credit system is referred to as ESG score, with ESG meaning "environmental, social, and governance." The prime underpinning of ESG scoring is the (WEF influenced) transition from corporate "shareholders" (ownership shares in a company) to "stakeholder" (someone with an interest in a business).
Once a business or company becomes beholding to someone other than those who own it, there needs to be a way for those with an interest in the business to evaluate whether or not the business is fulfilling those stakeholders' interests. That method is the ESG score. Capitalism=out. Stakeholder Capitalism=in.
(thanks Sako Man)
From the good guys at BlackRock:
This all hit home close to me recently. The company that my wife works for told her to not bother applying for a certain job because, even as a woman, she isn't "diverse" enough, and that the position she was applying for was a key determinant of their ESG score which influences the rates that they can borrow money at.
Toward the end of the second video, the narrator states that the SCS is to change "the actions and thoughts of the Chinese population, not through violence or force but through the process of gradual normative behavioral change." Taking away the ability of someone to travel, have a good job, or purchase goods by disrupting their free will doesn't feel gradual or normative, but instead feels kind of like force.
The social credit system is typically associated with individuals. The business or corporate version of the social credit system is referred to as ESG score, with ESG meaning "environmental, social, and governance." The prime underpinning of ESG scoring is the (WEF influenced) transition from corporate "shareholders" (ownership shares in a company) to "stakeholder" (someone with an interest in a business).
Once a business or company becomes beholding to someone other than those who own it, there needs to be a way for those with an interest in the business to evaluate whether or not the business is fulfilling those stakeholders' interests. That method is the ESG score. Capitalism=out. Stakeholder Capitalism=in.
(thanks Sako Man)
From the good guys at BlackRock:
This all hit home close to me recently. The company that my wife works for told her to not bother applying for a certain job because, even as a woman, she isn't "diverse" enough, and that the position she was applying for was a key determinant of their ESG score which influences the rates that they can borrow money at.
