I need a case and I just don't know what to do. I understand the soft case for the range, hard case to travel concept. My application is solely to travel with the case in the trunk of my car to the range, and that's it.
I take all my optic (red dot, ACOG, etc.) rifles to the range with various soft cases with no issues. I have a bench rifle that had a Leupold 3-15 power scope on it and for that I used an MTM hard case, which worked quite well for low cost.
Now the question. I changed the scope to a Vortex Razor HD Gen III 6-36x56. This scope is a monster. The turrets are about 4" wide left to right. It obviously won't fit in my MTM case. With 1" of padding on each side I'd need at least a 6" depth for this.
I assumed with a scope this expensive (for me) and bulky I'd want a hard case. I was looking at say a Pelican Vault V730 because it's deep enough, and with a 20" barrel on this rifle I can get almost 2" of cushion on each end, and still get the case in my trunk.
The issue at hand is, as I have read in several other threads here, a heavy (about 22 pounds with foam) hard case seems like overkill for a trip to the range. On the other hand with turrets about 4" wide would this really be the exception to the rule for a hard case for the range? I just can't see how this would work well in a soft case. Not to mention nowadays most decent soft cases are priced about the same as this low-end Pelican.
This gun is basically a bench gun for me, used at the range only. At this range I have yet to see any bench/precision rifle shooter show up with anything but a hard case. When hunters show up for their yearly sight in with scopes like my Leupold they are almost all soft cases. I've never seen anyone with a big scope (or a Nightforce, Tangent Theta, ZCO, etc.) use anything but a hard case.
I would love some input on this. Lighter is obviously easier, but with this quite large scope I'm a bit concerned if it would protect it well enough given the width (if there is even a soft case able to accommodate that wide of a scope). Thanks for any insight and opinions on this.
I take all my optic (red dot, ACOG, etc.) rifles to the range with various soft cases with no issues. I have a bench rifle that had a Leupold 3-15 power scope on it and for that I used an MTM hard case, which worked quite well for low cost.
Now the question. I changed the scope to a Vortex Razor HD Gen III 6-36x56. This scope is a monster. The turrets are about 4" wide left to right. It obviously won't fit in my MTM case. With 1" of padding on each side I'd need at least a 6" depth for this.
I assumed with a scope this expensive (for me) and bulky I'd want a hard case. I was looking at say a Pelican Vault V730 because it's deep enough, and with a 20" barrel on this rifle I can get almost 2" of cushion on each end, and still get the case in my trunk.
The issue at hand is, as I have read in several other threads here, a heavy (about 22 pounds with foam) hard case seems like overkill for a trip to the range. On the other hand with turrets about 4" wide would this really be the exception to the rule for a hard case for the range? I just can't see how this would work well in a soft case. Not to mention nowadays most decent soft cases are priced about the same as this low-end Pelican.
This gun is basically a bench gun for me, used at the range only. At this range I have yet to see any bench/precision rifle shooter show up with anything but a hard case. When hunters show up for their yearly sight in with scopes like my Leupold they are almost all soft cases. I've never seen anyone with a big scope (or a Nightforce, Tangent Theta, ZCO, etc.) use anything but a hard case.
I would love some input on this. Lighter is obviously easier, but with this quite large scope I'm a bit concerned if it would protect it well enough given the width (if there is even a soft case able to accommodate that wide of a scope). Thanks for any insight and opinions on this.