Re: Soldier Reprimanded for Participating In Politics
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CE1371</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Silver_Bullet_00</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CE1371</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ignorance of the UCMJ is not a valid defense. This guy made an idiot move and he knew better. </div></div>
Ignorance is not a defense, but he might not have known better. It was stupid, but I don't think it deserved such a harsh punishment. It was just words, which didn't harm anyone, or put anyone in harms way. Seems Paul's campaign should have known better than to put someone up there in uniform. It's one thing to have a soldier support your campaign off duty and out of uniform, but it's not OK when they are in uniform representing the US Military. The Military does not endorse. He should have known better, but maybe he didn't, and he got caught up in a moment of passion. Far worse intentional misconduct sometimes gets just a slap on the wrist. I don't think this was intentional misconduct. I wish Paul's campaign would appoligize for putting him (a uniform soldier) in the spot light, and I say this as a Ron Paul Supporter. He was approached by the media and the campaign, he did not seek them. </div></div>
He deserved exactly what he got. It's on him to follow the UCMJ and to act in an ethical manner that represents our military with honor and professionalism. We don't mix politics with military duty but that's not even what this is about. He was up there in the limelight for his 15 minutes of fame and he was abusing his status as a member of the military to get that 15 minutes. He used the uniform for his own egotistical needs, nothing more, nothing less.
Not much better than those idiots who are not even in the military that wear the uniform in public to receive attention. I have little patience for attention-seekers such as this example. </div></div>
Now that I think about it, I can see your point. It was stupid.