OK, so I'm going to try out the OCW method for testing some new rounds tomorrow and as I'm reading through Dan's instructions a couple things don't make sense:
It appears that he is doing his testing without a chronograph and settles on an OCW regardless of MV. If that MV ends up being too low or less than desired, say for getting out to 1K with decent energy to buck the wind - is the OCW REALLY the best charge?
The 2nd thing is he starts with published max numbers and backs off 10% and then works back up. We all know, or at least I've found from experience that the manufacturers max #'s are notoriously slow and very conservative. At least in my rifle (20" SPS-T), I'm finding there is no way I'm coming close to the MVs of even the published max loads in the Sierra manual and others. I'm usually in the 150-200 fps under range. So what's a girl to do?
It appears that he is doing his testing without a chronograph and settles on an OCW regardless of MV. If that MV ends up being too low or less than desired, say for getting out to 1K with decent energy to buck the wind - is the OCW REALLY the best charge?
The 2nd thing is he starts with published max numbers and backs off 10% and then works back up. We all know, or at least I've found from experience that the manufacturers max #'s are notoriously slow and very conservative. At least in my rifle (20" SPS-T), I'm finding there is no way I'm coming close to the MVs of even the published max loads in the Sierra manual and others. I'm usually in the 150-200 fps under range. So what's a girl to do?