Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When shooting steel at distance are you accounting for spin drift since you're looking for hits not bulls eyes?
i thought this was a good video of how to sight in for spin drift
i thought this was a good video of how to sight in for spin drift
So your saying his ballistic app is incorrect and he shouldn't dial .9 moa for spin drift?What, the part where he had a left to right tailwind and claimed that it was all due to spin drift? Look at the paper on his shooting table flapping in the breeze.
Yes unless you are shooting 3 miles. I don’t use it or Coriolis. The simple fact is there is no way to calculate ite. It’s a SWAg at best and some calculators like AB just compound the problem by giving you a compounding flat rate. If SD was an issue we would all be using LH Twist barrels and eliminate it. Does it exist, yes. Is it something we have to concern ourselves with for our purposes (ELR and ULR excluded) not really. Maybe beyond transonic it’s an issue but that’s about it. Seriously. Turn it off and see what happens. I think you would be surprised. I was shooting 20 mph winds not accounting for SD and getting hits all the way out to 1425 with a 6.5.So your saying his ballistic app is incorrect and he shouldn't dial .9 moa for spin drift?
I know how to work the ballistic calculators and I know they say it's 0.3 mil based on the math. What I'm telling you is that doesn't match what I see when shooting. I shoot at that target all the time, with different guns, and in different conditions. There's just not 0.3 mil of spin drift. I've shot on DEAD days where it was pretty much straight up, maybe favor left edge. This is a 0.4mil wide target, you would notice 0.3 mil of drift. Not saying it doesn't exist, just saying it's not 0.3 mil at 1225.
IMO this is one of those things that's better experienced in practice than worked out in theory.
We miss half the time with or without it.
So if I understand you correctly. You are shooting a .4 Mil target and holding left edge on a dead calm day. That would be .2 Mil of SD which depending on your Density Altitude is probably exactly right. If your ballistic app is saying .3 then it is probably a rounding error from .25 Mils.
Your description sounds dead on with what I experience as well for holding SD. You would miss half the time if you held center on that target.
But I didn't miss when holding center of the target, even though the calculator gave a drift number in inches that was over half the target width. And keep in mind these SD numbers are not including the horizontal component of the coriolis force which at my latitude is roughly an additional 4 inches at 1225 yards (0.1 mil). My gut says that with the combination of SD and Coriolis I don't see more than half a target's worth of drift.
At the ELR match spending the weekend shooting with some of the best shooters in the counrty, know how many times I heard the words "spin drift" or "coriolis"? None. I turn them both off in my ballistics app.
You're not going to math the target into submission.
No one disputes it’s real, but AB especially (of which I use frequently) overstates it. When I say turn it off, it doesn’t mean I don’t account for it in my wind holds. I gather dope on the wind and it’s built in. Problem with AB and many others is it compounds it. It adds too much because it’s using a linear equation for a non linear problem. If I’m hitting dead center at 1k with a 1 mil hold in 20mph winds, I’d say I have SD accounted for. Difference is maybe it’s only really .1 instead of .9 It’s just not as drastic as these BC’s state because it’s not being accounted for correctly in a point mass solver.Every ELR shooter I work with uses corrections for SD but if you don't think it matters then that is your choice. My only point is that it is simple and exact so why not eliminate it as a variable.
http://appliedballisticsllc.com/Articles/ABDOC108_GyroscopicAndCoriolis.pdf
No one disputes it’s real, but AB especially (of which I use frequently) overstates it. When I say turn it off, it doesn’t mean I don’t account for it in my wind holds. I gather dope on the wind and it’s built in. Problem with AB and many others is it compounds it. It adds too much because it’s using a linear equation for a non linear problem. If I’m hitting dead center at 1k with a 1 mil hold in 20mph winds, I’d say I have SD accounted for. Difference is maybe it’s only really .1 instead of .9 It’s just not as drastic as these BC’s state because it’s not being accounted for correctly in a point mass solver.
Math is the only reason we can hit the target in the first place. Just because you have something else doing the math for you does not mean it doesn't exist. Take the app away from most shooters and change the density altitude and they become helpless at ELR. It has always been my preference to build calculations by hand so I have knowledge and context for my firing solution.
The approximate solutions for SG and spin drift are based on sound math, and they're much better than nothing. However they're far from perfect.
An example from my own spin drift testing.
We built two 308 Win rifles, similar in every way with exception of left vs. right twist barrels. We volley fired into a common point of impact 32" above the point of aim at 100 yards on a plumb line. This 100 yard volley fire insured the rifles were zeroed together, and the only difference in their point of impact at long range would be the difference in spin drift between the left and right twist barrels.
Two bullet types were tested.
175 grain Berger OTM
When 10-shot groups were fired from the two rifles at 1000 yards, there was 22.8" horizontal difference between the group centers. That means that each group drifted 11.4" from center. The calculated spin drift for this bullet in the conditions of the day was 11.2". Considering the group size and minor data scatter, this is a pretty close estimate for the calculation.
185 grain Berger OTM (Juggernaut)
Same procedure was employed for this bullet. In this case, the 1000-yard group centers were 6.7" left and right of center but the calculated spin drift was 8.8". So in this case, the formula missed the measured value by 2.1 inches. Wind was very low for both of these tests.
Full details of this test are published in Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting - Vol 1, Chapter 12.
To wrap up our spin drift detour, I can say that the formulas available for calculating spin drift are approximations, and do not always agree perfectly with direct measurements.
I use Coldbore but it has never been off by that much. I'll have to compare it to AB.
Pleas do, I’d be interested in seeing what the difference is.
Send me your input info and result and I will input it for cold bore and post it.
I don’t understand why guys dismiss SD, perhaps some solvers overstate the effect but the entire effort of long range shooting is eliminating as many variables and variations shot to shot as possible.
I don’t understand why guys dismiss SD, perhaps some solvers overstate the effect but the entire effort of long range shooting is eliminating as many variables and variations shot to shot as possible.
According to my ballistics app, at 1000y spin drift will push my rounds .2 Mils right. That’s 10.8 inched. A 1 mph wind with have the same affect. I don’t know too many people that can read the wind down range all the way down to 1mph increments. It’s usulally a SWAG and they give it range (3-5).
Not arguing that SD doesn’t exist, it just gets lost in the mix of more important variables in my opinion.
Well, it certainly is a small effect compared to wind but if we can identify the variable and correct for it then why not? Why do guys reload when they can buy factory ammo that gives a SD of 9-15fps? Because they can get a SD of 5 fps with reloading, its the small things that add up, unless you’re happy to just hit big pieces of steel or walk your shots to the target. Every variable that can be identified and accounted for is important, IMO.
According to my ballistics app, at 1000y spin drift will push my rounds .2 Mils right. That’s 10.8 inched. A 1 mph wind with have the same affect. I don’t know too many people that can read the wind down range all the way down to 1mph increments. It’s usulally a SWAG and they give it range (3-5).
Not arguing that SD doesn’t exist, it just gets lost in the mix of more important variables in my opinion.
Send me your input info and result and I will input it for cold bore and post it.
I noticed your ballistic coefficient is set to 1 .
Is that normal?
Will ab run on an Android phone?