Super low SD but crappy groups, what to do

tylerradke

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 13, 2017
281
562
So working on a load for my AR10 308 and I am using virgin starline brass, varget, and 175 smk with COAL of 2.810. I loaded 5 of each charge weight starting at 43grn increasing 0.3 grn at a time up to 44.5 grn. I was hoping to be 2600+fps when I found a load but my 43grn load avg just over 2500 and had an ES of 7 fps and SD of 3. Now I could deal with the slower velocity if it shot well but it shot about a 2" group at 100. Now being an AR I don't have a ton of room to play with seating depth to get it to tighten up but I will spend the time and resources doing so if someone smarter than me thinks it's worth my time and money to explore. Otherwise I'm tempted to keep creeping up charge weight until the stars align and I get the velocity I was after and a good grouping. Factory m118lr shoots just over 2600 and groups around .75-1.00 out of this rifle, and at 44.5 I am just under 2600 fps and no real pressure signs. I will go higher am just leery because 45 seems like a real hot charge out of a gas gun. Maybe I'm just being a chicken too.
 
So working on a load for my AR10 308 and I am using virgin starline brass, varget, and 175 smk with COAL of 2.810. I loaded 5 of each charge weight starting at 43grn increasing 0.3 grn at a time up to 44.5 grn. I was hoping to be 2600+fps when I found a load but my 43grn load avg just over 2500 and had an ES of 7 fps and SD of 3. Now I could deal with the slower velocity if it shot well but it shot about a 2" group at 100. Now being an AR I don't have a ton of room to play with seating depth to get it to tighten up but I will spend the time and resources doing so if someone smarter than me thinks it's worth my time and money to explore. Otherwise I'm tempted to keep creeping up charge weight until the stars align and I get the velocity I was after and a good grouping. Factory m118lr shoots just over 2600 and groups around .75-1.00 out of this rifle, and at 44.5 I am just under 2600 fps and no real pressure signs. I will go higher am just leery because 45 seems like a real hot charge out of a gas gun. Maybe I'm just being a chicken too.
You didn't say anything about the barrel(s), like. . . what's the lengths? If you've got a 20" barrel, I think you're asking too much for a 175 SMK. . .depending on how hot your lot of Varget burns (can only tell with chrono data). With the default burn rate and a 20" barrel, here something that might give you some ideas. . .???

,308 175-SMK Varget.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RegionRat
You didn't say anything about the barrel(s), like. . . what's the lengths? If you've got a 20" barrel, I think your asking too much for a 175 SMK. . .depending on how hot your lot of Varget burns (can only tell with chrono data). With the default burn rate and a 20" barrel, here something that might give you some ideas. . .???

View attachment 8472807
It is a 20" 1-10 twist
 
Try 40.7 grains of AR Comp. I liked around 43.7 grains of Varget in FC brass in my Maten but it was too hot. 45 grains in Starline brass is too hot. You’ll wreck your gun.
I don't have any AR comp but I have 8208xbr which is virtually identical burn rate to AR comp. Should give similar results
 
OP - Is there a particular reason you are shooting 175s? Like, 1000yd shooting? If so, the magic MV to keep the 175 stable "ish" is 2550. If you aren't shooting LR, then try some 155s or 168s. Barrel just might like the different weights or bullet profiles. Good job on the ES/SD, your combustion is spot on, but the harmonics are not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp and Im2bent
OP - Is there a particular reason you are shooting 175s? Like, 1000yd shooting? If so, the magic MV to keep the 175 stable "ish" is 2550. If you aren't shooting LR, then try some 155s or 168s. Barrel just might like the different weights or bullet profiles. Good job on the ES/SD, your combustion is spot on, but the harmonics are not.
I am shooting out to 1000. I am trying to get to 2600 safely because that is what my factory ammo is running so I know it's possible out of this rifle.
 
I am shooting out to 1000. I am trying to get to 2600 safely because that is what my factory ammo is running so I know it's possible out of this rifle.
I think 2600, or very close to it, should be doable with a 20" barrel. My GAP-10 / 18" Bartlein gets 2580 with Federal GMM 175s. My handloads are matched to that ammunition, and I'm using 41.9 g of IMR 4064. Which, I believe, is the same type/amount of powder used in Mk 316, which is apparently the replacement for M118LR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seymour Fish
The 118LR has gone through so many iterations I'm speculating this is MK316 Mod 1. My guess its using SMP 768 which is a ball powder that was developed by St. Marks to be temperature stable. If I were looking at trying to duplicate that I would think StaBall Match is probably as close as you can get.

It might be worth bareakiing a round down to very its ball powder and checking the bullet weight. Is the case stamped Win or LC?
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp
Attempting to get 2600 with a specific powder because factory ammo gets 2600 with a totally different powder sounds sort of arbitrary.

Also, you ES of 7 and SD of 3 will level out if you shoot more rounds. Within 800yd, dispersion is grossly more important than velocity spreads for hit probability, too. Personally, I'd address the gas system, barrel/upper fit, or muzzle device to wrangle in dispersion, and wouldn't worry about the velocity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp and kthomas
You're not going to safely or efficiently glean 2600 fps from a 20" gasser pushing 175's.

And it doesn't matter what the SD is if it won't group for shit.

Mike