SureFire FA762-SS cloning?

Skunk

Amongst the Enemy
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 24, 2003
1,800
4,724
Lost in the Sauce
All,

Those of us with M40A5’s and/or XM-3’s know this suppressor is rare and expensive. They rarely pop up for sale, and when they do the dildo selling it wants some laughable amount for it. So, is there a workaround?

ECCO machine and BSD Fabrication are doing some awesome stuff by utilizing the SureFire (SF) lock ring taken off a Warden Blast Regulator or other SF suppressor. They’re machining the body of the Warden to interface with other modern suppressors set up for HUB attachments, so that those suppressors may be mounted onto current SF muzzle devices/brakes.

My question is can the lock collar from a Warden can be made to adapt/mount another suppressor to the MB762SSAL/RE muzzle device found on the M40A5?

Anyone been down this road yet?
 
Screenshot_20240124_202636_Chrome.jpg



I don't believe it would work with the warden without modification to one or the other.
I had a warden and was looking to form one it and do similar to what ECCO is now doing. I am pretty sure when I was researching I found the warden to be a specific brake/attachment point, that is exclusive to a few of the SureFire suppresor line; but excluded a few. I think your brake was on that list.

Dunno, would have to do some more digging to verify 100%
 
View attachment 8332024



No go.
The warden is a "SOCOM" Series.


Maybe with some modifications from someone like @LRI it could work. ??

Yeah, I’m following what you’re saying. However, if the new fast-attach muzzle device shares the same diameter and tapered shoulder dimensions as the older brakes, it would seem that finding a solution for the added length of the MB762SSAL/RE would make this possible. Essentially, I’d be using just the locking collar from the Warden and adapting it to another suppressor which would go over the old style brake. Obviously, that suppressor would need quite a deep initial chamber to accommodate the length of the MB762SSAL/RE. (Insert “knocking the bottom out” jokes here…)

I’m gonna talk to ECCO and the other place about it. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve had this conversation before.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: camocorvette
556 trainer. The inside will need to have the taper machined in to mate with the muzzle device. Not sure if it can be done with a warden. BSD did mine and said a 7.62 or 556 trainer would work. I didn't ask about a warden.

I don’t think there are any commercial HUB cans with a blast chamber big enough to fit.

You’ll also need to figure something out for alignment. It’s not necessary for lockup, but you’ll want something for consistency.
 
Form1 is approved, but haven’t gotten around to finishing it. Still doing some research on baffle stack.

I’m at the mercy of LRI on getting my xm-3 built. I don’t have anything I can put the muzzle device on until then anyway.
 
556 trainer. The inside will need to have the taper machined in to mate with the muzzle device. Not sure if it can be done with a warden. BSD did mine and said a 7.62 or 556 trainer would work. I didn't ask about a warden.

I don’t think there are any commercial HUB cans with a blast chamber big enough to fit.

You’ll also need to figure something out for alignment. It’s not necessary for lockup, but you’ll want something for consistency.

Why, considering the cost, did you use a 5.56 Trainer as the starting point instead of the Warden? Is there some characteristic of the Trainer that’s needed in order for this idea to work?
 
Look at Griffin Armament. They make OTB (Over the barrel) suppressors and muzzle devices that look very similar to the old Surefire muzzle devices used for the XM-3, M40a5 and M40a5. Could be the answer for clones and new builds.
 
This has been a conundrum for some time. We have some research going on now. Yes, we have the muzzle device, but no suppressor options. Yes, we have the Warden conversions, but that ONLY for the SOCOM series. The FA762-SS requires an over the barrel fit, in addition to the locking device. I do not see why a suppressor cannot be retroftitted to the muzzle device, but things always look easy, and when it gets to a product, there is the question of: is there a viable market.

Hey, if anyone has an FA762-SS that is in need of service or cleaning or Cerakoting, let us know. :cool:
 
This has been a conundrum for some time. We have some research going on now. Yes, we have the muzzle device, but no suppressor options. Yes, we have the Warden conversions, but that ONLY for the SOCOM series. The FA762-SS requires an over the barrel fit, in addition to the locking device. I do not see why a suppressor cannot be retroftitted to the muzzle device, but things always look easy, and when it gets to a product, there is the question of: is there a viable market.

Hey, if anyone has an FA762-SS that is in need of service or cleaning or Cerakoting, let us know. :cool:
You could count on one sale here.
 
I wonder what ppl are actually paying for them. I’d probably go $2k just for the ease of having something to use on my A5, but that would be about it. Principle alone will keep me from paying the asking prices I’m seeing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevo86
Took possession today. Very nice suppressor.

Even goes on and locks up on a 4-prong brake, for CQB work!
IMG_1988.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1987.jpeg
    IMG_1987.jpeg
    517 KB · Views: 114
  • IMG_1986.jpeg
    IMG_1986.jpeg
    260.1 KB · Views: 113
  • IMG_1985.jpeg
    IMG_1985.jpeg
    287.2 KB · Views: 109
  • IMG_1989.jpeg
    IMG_1989.jpeg
    301.9 KB · Views: 113
  • IMG_1992.jpeg
    IMG_1992.jpeg
    284.8 KB · Views: 118
  • IMG_2093.jpeg
    IMG_2093.jpeg
    733.9 KB · Views: 115
Looks great, thanks for the pictures.

Judging by the replies, I think there are quite a few people interested in the details... Are you able to share who built it?
 
Alright, Dingalings…. I know this isn’t impressive shooting, but I just wanted to check zero shift and see what the suppressor sounds like.

The wind today was a little gusty from 3 o’clock. No corrections. I was slinging them seated off a bench.

The top group is unsuppressed, 3rnds of M118LR.

The bottom diamond was fired at with three different lots of M118 and M118LR. The five rnds in/at the 4 o’clock were the same ammo as on the top diamond. The other rounds were a different lot of M118LR and some old M118 Special Ball.

Doesn’t seem to be much zero shift to worry about. I think with good ammo, prone, with some effort, it wouldn’t be worth thinking about.

Sounds pretty good to the calibrated hearing ports, too. Definitely happy with it.
IMG_1993.jpeg
 
Looks great. Mind sharing what details you can on the baffle stack? Looks like 9-10 baffles about evenly spaced? Baffle type just straight cones or some of the fancier geometries currently being used?

Was the alignment pin placed to work on the flash hider muzzle device too? Looks like it should based on the earlier pic you posted.
 
I can count eight baffles. Nine if you include the end cap… They’re not quite evenly spaced.
I would say they’re cone shaped. The blast baffle looks like a straight cone. All the baffles are clipped and inline.

I’m not sure about the pin working on the flash hider brake, but I sure hope so; I’ve got a XM-3 coming, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shlouf and kft101