Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have both the Ultra 9 and 338. I actually prefer the 338 can on my 300NM
It's rated for it, and its a decent volume can.
If you have an Ultra 9, I see no reason not to use it on a .300NM. If you are looking to purchase a can for a .300NM, then the Magnus would be more optimal.
It could be done, but I wouldn't shoot too fast with one. I have one too but wouldn't trust myself with it on there with my cadence of shooting. Hence why I have a Gen 2 SR in jail waiting for approval. I have already blown up one suppressor with the NM.
Silencerco Hybrid 45. I did put a couple of hundred rounds through it before it shot off the end of my barrel. I only had 5 rounds left for the day and decided to burn through it really fast at 1100 yards. On the very last shot of the day the core let go, never to be seen again. At least I had the outer shell and Silencerco did warranty the suppressor. That's the part where I learned my lesson to not shoot a big magnum really fast on a 1.5" suppressor.Out of curiosity, which can got killed by a NM?
Magnus would get my vote.Anyone regularly use a TBAC Ultra 9 with 300 Norma or similar?
I may eventuality get a 338 Ultra but I was curious if the Ultra 9 would be sufficient for regular use.