Found a neat curiosity on my Tikka M65A while shopping for a proper scope & rings for it -
The scope rail/ action rail on the 65A (yes the 65A) measures 15.7mm 'across', while the action rail on the M55/ M65 series are 16.3mm and finally the T3 is advertised as 17mm
Does anyone out there have the background on the rail dimensional change or on the M65A design particularly with regard to the rail dimension?
(ie maybe an external driver present was present in the year of our lord 1990, when Parker Hale made the Spuhr equivalent rings of the day, and they were 15.7mm?)
The overall design is a very impressive evolution which tells the story of the transition from the M65 to the 558/ 658 as the 80's turned to the 90's. It's also very neat to understand the design ideas (and complexity) which went into the 65A from the Tak-85 really, but quickly evolved to the TRG-21/41 to improve robustness. The engineering fundamentals used are pretty cool.
The scope rail/ action rail on the 65A (yes the 65A) measures 15.7mm 'across', while the action rail on the M55/ M65 series are 16.3mm and finally the T3 is advertised as 17mm
Does anyone out there have the background on the rail dimensional change or on the M65A design particularly with regard to the rail dimension?
(ie maybe an external driver present was present in the year of our lord 1990, when Parker Hale made the Spuhr equivalent rings of the day, and they were 15.7mm?)
The overall design is a very impressive evolution which tells the story of the transition from the M65 to the 558/ 658 as the 80's turned to the 90's. It's also very neat to understand the design ideas (and complexity) which went into the 65A from the Tak-85 really, but quickly evolved to the TRG-21/41 to improve robustness. The engineering fundamentals used are pretty cool.