Tips for Benchrest accuracy from PRS style rifle

[tsonda]

OK, Let me tell you what I'm doing, Then I would like to hear some tips to improve our accuracy. My 11yo and 9yo are shooting a match that is scored more like a benchrest or Fclass match. 500 yard and 750 yards. In that points are awarded for more center hits on a steel plate. I'm trying to find out what I can do to build better ammo to do the job to the best of our abilities.

Currently shooting a 23" barreled 6mm Dasher 1:7.5 twist on Impact action suppressed. Have to shoot prone off a bipod, we have a Harris. Currently running 105 Hybrids over Varget at 2915. Accuracy node is more important to me than speed. Top distance at the moment is 750yards.

Lapua brass- I don't anneal, overall what is my benefit here?
105 Hybrids- Will custom bullets like Vapor trails or Barts Bullets help much? I don't measure and sort my bullets (I've already ordered some and got on list to try)
I hand weigh every charge on a tuned OHAUS. Not sure what else I can do here.
Match rounds I try to sort by feel of resistance when seating bullet.
I don't have a very good chrono. I chrono and then tweak in my Ballistic APP. (I'm assuming this could really help by finding lower SD's)

Things I've thought of-
Cleaning inside of necks (I've heard steel wool, graphite)?
Moly coating bullets?
Custom bullets?
Different style bullet, flat base. Not sure what I'll lose in the wind here with BC. I know I've read of some Benchrest guys not shooting Boattails
Neck turning, I really don't want to do this if possible.
Sorting brass, I currently don't
Trying different primers? I currently use CCI 450's

Thanks for any advice.

 

[Precision Underground]

Annealing will make the cases accurate for more loads and extend the life of the brass. Once it gets hardened it will become inconsistent. So you don't HAVE to anneal but you will have to throw out the brass a lot sooner if you don't.

What kind of accuracy are you getting now? I don't do anything special other than be consistent while doing the basics and my ammo shoots .3 - .5 from a bipod in the dirt when I shoot groups (rarely). I'd say using the right bullet/powder combo for the barrel and just being consistent in what you do is much more important than trying to find something "else" do do to make accurate ammo.

 

[LawnMM]

Buy a chronograph. IMO you should develop your load first by chronograph, then by accuracy of the load.

Why you may ask? But OCW...but ladder test...but...but...

You could have a quarter minute group at 100yds, if your SD is 30 and ES is 60 your consistency downrange at 600-1k is going to start being a problem. Particularly on a benchrest type target rather than a big steel target that can eat up some of the velocity error.

Start with a load that looks good on the Chrono, then see if you like the group size. If you subscribe to the whole barrel timing theory with ladders and OCW where we want the bullet to exit the muzzle while the vibration wave in the barrel is farthest away this should resonate.

If the bullet exits as the shockwave is present at the muzzle, so the theory goes, you get poor accuracy as the muzzle is vibrating on bullet exit.

I don't believe, absent a mechanical issue with the chambering job, barrel material, etc. that it's possible to achieve a consistent, low SD/ES load that doesn't shoot well. Consistency begets a tight shooting rifle.

Now if the chamber isn't concentric and bullets are jumping into the bore at angles or your crown is fucked up sure, but soley on the basis of the load, consistency matters.

Think about OCW tests. You're looking for bullet impacts on target with low vertical dispersion. What's the primary cause of vertical dispersion? At distance, it's variance in muzzle velocity.

I'm not saying don't check for accuracy, I've worked up a consistent load on Chrono that wouldn't group well. It was a factory Remington barrel. Shit chamber job. Rebarreled and had the action worked on, now it's a hammer.

The point is, don't waste time on group size at 100yds only to realize later your SD/ES suck and you're starting over.

Edited to add annealing is a waste of time and money unless you're well over ten reloads on the brass.

 

[tsonda]

When we shoot groups at a 100 we are in the same range as you. .3 to .5 for 5 shots. I also realize just improving my windcalling could help a lot as well!

 

[lash]

The benefit to annealing is consistent neck tension. It matters.

 

[Sheldon N]

How small is the center score ring of the steel plate? Or to phrase the question in a different way, how tight does the vertical dispersion need to be at 750 yards? Second question, when you shoot... where are you most often missing? Is it left/right or vertical?

A well developed Dasher load on a PRS gun should be able to hold vertical of 3-4 inches or so at 750 yards without any fancy benchrest processes.

How does your gun shoot when you put it on paper at 750 yards on a calm day?

 

[tsonda]

vertically at distance we are usually holding around .5 MOA. But I hear ya, I've spent thousands on rifles and optics and I've cheaped out on a Chrono. I figured that would be one of the suggestions. Thanks

 

[tsonda]

Its rarely calm at my house. But on the better wind of days will hold .5 MOA at 750 of vertical dispersion. Center ring of target is 1.5"

 

[tsonda]

sorry center ring is 3" in diameter. 1.5" per side.

 

[EchoDeltaSierra]

Reloading Like A Pro – Tips From Top Precision Rifle Shooters

I’ve surveyed the top 100 shooters in the Precision Rifle Series (PRS) for the past 4 years, and pub...

precisionrifleblog.com

Well worth reading. From this article and my personal experience, annealing every firing is probably the single item with the most significant impact you can perform.

I use an Annealeez and torch my 300 pieces of Lapua match brass every firing. That with accurate charging is about all I do to maintain sub-1/2 minute ammo.

 

[Sheldon N]

My 0.02 on what you could do to place better.

Wind, wind wind is number one. Doesn't matter if your gun shoots 0.5 MOA or 0.2 MOA if you can't call the wind. This dwarfs everything else.

For bullets, Bart's or Vapor trails will shoot smaller than Hybrids. There's a reason the benchrest guys shoot custom bullets almost exclusively and you don't hear much about world records being set with Hybrids these days. I would say you can probably get away with shooting hybrids for this application though. Sorting the bullets will help, even a simple length sort is pretty easy and will tighten up your vertical at distance. My understanding is that US AMU uses length sorting, that's what I've settled on too as a good balance between attention to detail vs overboard OCD.

As far as loading to a chronograph data, that is not what benchrest guys do. Benchrest loading by the vast majority of top BR shooters is done through meticulous testing, on paper, at distance, in favorable conditions to see what produces the best repeatable results. Lots of work goes into it. The process is usually pretty simple... start with a powder charge weight traditional ladder test, look for the area where vertical remains as flat as possible across sequential charges. Repeat test to confirm and use that as the powder charge node. Then test things like seating depth, primers, neck tension, to see if you can tighten the groups up further. All the OCW and chronograph and 100 yard test methods are just trying to guess at the truth - which is defined by downrange impacts on paper which doesn't lie. And the biggest judge is lack of vertical dispersion.

I wouldn't nerd out too deep though. Get a good load that will hold vertical the size of your bullseye, then spend the rest of your efforts on getting better at wind.

 

[Precision Underground]

Buy a chronograph. IMO you should develop your load first by chronograph, then by accuracy of the load.

Why you may ask? But OCW...but ladder test...but...but...

You could have a quarter minute group at 100yds, if your SD is 30 and ES is 60 your consistency downrange at 600-1k is going to start being a problem. Particularly on a benchrest type target rather than a big steel target that can eat up some of the velocity error.

Start with a load that looks good on the Chrono, then see if you like the group size. If you subscribe to the whole barrel timing theory with ladders and OCW where we want the bullet to exit the muzzle while the vibration wave in the barrel is farthest away this should resonate.

If the bullet exits as the shockwave is present at the muzzle, so the theory goes, you get poor accuracy as the muzzle is vibrating on bullet exit.

I don't believe, absent a mechanical issue with the chambering job, barrel material, etc. that it's possible to achieve a consistent, low SD/ES load that doesn't shoot well. Consistency begets a tight shooting rifle.

Now if the chamber isn't concentric and bullets are jumping into the bore at angles or your crown is fucked up sure, but soley on the basis of the load, consistency matters.

Think about OCW tests. You're looking for bullet impacts on target with low vertical dispersion. What's the primary cause of vertical dispersion? At distance, it's variance in muzzle velocity.

I'm not saying don't check for accuracy, I've worked up a consistent load on Chrono that wouldn't group well. It was a factory Remington barrel. Shit chamber job. Rebarreled and had the action worked on, now it's a hammer.

The point is, don't waste time on group size at 100yds only to realize later your SD/ES suck and you're starting over.

Edited to add annealing is a waste of time and money unless you're well over ten reloads on the brass.

Annealing frequency is absolutely dependent on how much the brass is worked with each firing and subsequent sizing. There is no way to put a number on how often any brass will need annealing without knowing how much the brass is being worked and how it is being resized.

 

[tsonda]

Thanks for all the info. I'm always learning and trying to learn more.

Sheldon if length sorting bullets what is a good deviation to stay within?? And like you said I don't want to nerd out too much, I just don't have the time for it.

 

[Sheldon N]

Sheldon if length sorting bullets what is a good deviation to stay within?? And like you said I don't want to nerd out too much, I just don't have the time for it.

I just put out like 5-6 bins and sorted through a big lot of 2k bullets in an evening or two watching TV. I was sorting 105 Hybrids, all same lot, and used windows that were roughly 2.5 thou wide. The middle two lots will have the most bullets by far, then less bullets in the next highest/lowest, then an even smaller pile in the "outlier" bins for long and short. I still use them all, just group them and shoot the same lengths together.

You could certainly go "finer" increments, but then you'd just have more piles to manage.

 

[LawnMM]

Annealing frequency is absolutely dependent on how much the brass is worked with each firing and subsequent sizing. There is no way to put a number on how often any brass will need annealing without knowing how much the brass is being worked and how it is being resized.

Pretty sure most folks are bumping 0.002 but if you're tripling that, sure, go ahead and anneal away. The machines are expensive and at least when the Applied Ballistics folks tested it, zero difference in annealing every other, every firing, or not at all in excess of ten firings in terms of accuracy.

I do agree with Lash in that neck tension is important. My brass goes through a bushing neck die every time as the last step prior to loading.

I've yet to see any concrete evidence that annealing on a regular basis does anything other than hit your wallet and free time. There is supporting evidence of the opposite, that it's irrelevant in low cycle cases under ten firings.

 

[ken4570tc in WY]

I scanned the advice and didn't see any suggestions on bullet coating or dry neck lube. So here's my two cents worth. Most shooters are running naked bullets and those that don't have largely abandoned moly in favor of WS2 or HBN. Moly was found to build up and shorten barrel life. Under an electron microscope, sub micron moly looks a lot like broken glass. The sharp edges lock up and keep building up. Both the WS2 and HBN don't have that issue since they more resemble small round balls. When impact coating with 0.6 micron WS2, the material wouldn't build up beyond one layer deep, you could still make out the bullet jacket color. HBN is a much cleaner dry lube to work with. It's a white powder that leaves a clear finish and is considered to have lower toxicity than the sulfides. Because of the lower toxicity it is approved for use in the cosmetics industry. That being said, always wear a dust mask when handling the loose material. The human body/lungs don't do well with repeated exposure to fine particulates.

 

[camotoe]

Buy lapua brass. Custom bullets don't need sorting. Try different powders and primers. Reloader17 and h4895 are good. Neck turn and annealing are not necessary at this level . Leave inside necks dirty

 

[tsonda]

Interesting. Leave the necks dirty? Thanks for all advice so far

 

[camotoe]

The carbon on the inside of the neck will cut down on bullet weld. Think of it as free neck lube

 

[Spartan67]

Tsonda. Congrats on getting your 9, and 11 year old kids into shooting! Just remember its all about keeping the Kids happy, and interested in it. If they are, dont sweat the small stuff! Enjoy the range time while you can!

 

[supercorndogs]

What type of rest are you allowed to use?

 

[_Raining]

What type of rest are you allowed to use?

Have to shoot prone off a bipod

 

[Lynn Jr]

Don't anneal leave the necks dirty and custom bullets do work. A 107 Sierra is good to around 0.230 inch aggregates while the customs CAN cut that in half.
Some barrels have bullets they prefer.
You won't find many 600 1000 yard Benchrest Shooter using a flatbased 6mm bullet.
I shoot the 187 BIB flatbased bullets in my 300 WSM but no flatbased in my Dashers or BR's.
With a 23 inch barrel your velocity sounds correct as most Benchrest Shooters will be using 28-32 inch barrels at 3025-3050 FPS.
If your SD is 30 and your ES is 60 something is very very wrong with your gun if it's a Dasher. Your ES is what determines the vertical in your groups and it should be under 15 FPS and your SD should be single digit.
Tell us what reamer specs you have for freebore if you know?
Powder charge to the kernel is #1
Seating depth with a comparator to 0.001 is #2
Bullets is #3
when it comes to accuracy.
And never mention Benchrest as it upsets alot of posters here.

 

[brianf]

Don't anneal leave the necks dirty and custom bullets do work. A 107 Sierra is good to around 0.230 inch aggregates while the customs CAN cut that in half.
Some barrels have bullets they prefer.
You won't find many 600 1000 yard Benchrest Shooter using a flatbased 6mm bullet.
I shoot the 187 BIB flatbased bullets in my 300 WSM but no flatbased in my Dashers or BR's.
With a 23 inch barrel your velocity sounds correct as most Benchrest Shooters will be using 28-32 inch barrels at 3025-3050 FPS.
If your SD is 30 and your ES is 60 something is very very wrong with your gun if it's a Dasher. Your ES is what determines the vertical in your groups and it should be under 15 FPS and your SD should be single digit.
Tell us what reamer specs you have for freebore if you know?
Powder charge to the kernel is #1
Seating depth with a comparator to 0.001 is #2
Bullets is #3
when it comes to accuracy.
And never mention Benchrest as it upsets alot of posters here.

He asked for it...welcome to the rabbit hole for benchrest accuracy

 

[supercorndogs]

Pretty sure most folks are bumping 0.002 but if you're tripling that, sure, go ahead and anneal away. The machines are expensive and at least when the Applied Ballistics folks tested it, zero difference in annealing every other, every firing, or not at all in excess of ten firings in terms of accuracy.

I do agree with Lash in that neck tension is important. My brass goes through a bushing neck die every time as the last step prior to loading.

I've yet to see any concrete evidence that annealing on a regular basis does anything other than hit your wallet and free time. There is supporting evidence of the opposite, that it's irrelevant in low cycle cases. {under ten firings.}

Is that what that means? I.E. Low cycle cases means cases with less than ten firings?

 

[tsonda]

Ok Thanks for all the responses.

We have to shoot off a non F-class style bipod. I just happen to have Harris's
.104 freebore I believe.
I've done all my load development with the ladder test at 500yds, ( I think I really do need to invest in a good chrono)
I'm using Redding Micro seater die for bullet seating on a Coax
Bumping .002

 

[ceruleanblue]

...As far as loading to a chronograph data...

Hi Sheldon, can you explain what "load to a chronograph data" means please? How do you do it?

Thanks for your help!

CB

 

[lash]

Hi Sheldon, can you explain what "load to a chronograph data" means please? How do you do it?

Thanks for your help!

CB

Read the whole paragraph that starts with that phrase to see what he is talking about. He is referring to the load development method wherein one shoots a ‘ladder’ of increasing loads over a chronograph to plot the results and find the flat spots or nodes. Additionally, you use your chronograph to determine loads with low ES (extreme spread) and SD (standard deviation).

In his discussion, he is contrasting those methods and others, like OCW, to a more tedious and exacting method used by many successful benchrest competitors to further define a proper load for their purposes.

 

[Sheldon N]

Yes, what @lash said.

 

[ceruleanblue]

Read the whole paragraph that starts with that phrase to see what he is talking about. He is referring to the load development method wherein one shoots a ‘ladder’ of increasing loads over a chronograph to plot the results and find the flat spots or nodes. Additionally, you use your chronograph to determine loads with low ES (extreme spread) and SD (standard deviation).

In his discussion, he is contrasting those methods and others, like OCW, to a more tedious and exacting method used by many successful benchrest competitors to further define a proper load for their purposes.

I was wondering how the chronograph would be related to the ladder test. I guess it implies that if you find a load where ES or SD [of the measured velocity ] is minimum you automatically get a good grouping?
For some reason I had been thinking that ES and SD are connected to grouping size by themselves rather than velocity measurements.

Most grateful for your advice.

CB

 

[Sheldon N]

I guess it implies that if you find a load where ES or SD [of the measured velocity ] is minimum you automatically get a good grouping?

That is very often NOT the case. You can very easily have a load with stellar ES/SD but it groups like crap.

 

[ceruleanblue]

I'll reload with this part in mind:

"start with a powder charge weight traditional ladder test, look for the area where vertical remains as flat as possible across sequential charges. Repeat test to confirm and use that as the powder charge node. Then test things like seating depth, primers, neck tension, to see if you can tighten the groups up further. All the OCW and chronograph and 100 yard test methods are just trying to guess at the truth - which is defined by downrange impacts on paper which doesn't lie. And the biggest judge is lack of vertical dispersion."

Again, many thanks!

 

[Sheldon N]

"start with a powder charge weight traditional ladder test, look for the area where vertical remains as flat as possible across sequential charges. Repeat test to confirm and use that as the powder charge node. Then test things like seating depth, primers, neck tension, to see if you can tighten the groups up further. All the OCW and chronograph and 100 yard test methods are just trying to guess at the truth - which is defined by downrange impacts on paper which doesn't lie. And the biggest judge is lack of vertical dispersion."

The more I've been mulling this over one thing I think I would add is that I would want to know how well each charge weight or seating depth grouped in addition to whether it held consistent vertical. That's an area where doing additional tests at 100 yards or OCW style has benefits.

I think the end result goal is a load that not only shot as small as possible, but one that you knew would both hold consistent for both speed/vertical POI as well as remaining an accurate group even if you got the powder charge or seating depth a little wrong.

 

[Lynn Jr]

Which is why you do a ladder test. It puts you in the rising muzzle region rather than the declining region which is detrimental to accuracy.

 

[ceruleanblue]

Hi Sheldon: In an ideal ladder test would you first hone down on the charge, then on the seating depth? My concepts are on their head. I thought once you backed a couple mils off the bore grooves you were done with OAL. Do you have a workflow for making up a cartridge? Or perhaps a link to where I might learn more about this?

Hi Lynn Jr.: Where might I learn more about rising muzzle and declining muzzle? Sounds like another complication. I think the more I venture into learning about accuracy the more complex it all gets.

To both of you - very interesting, and thanks for taking the time!

 

[Sheldon N]

Hi Sheldon: In an ideal ladder test would you first hone down on the charge, then on the seating depth? My concepts are on their head. I thought once you backed a couple mils off the bore grooves you were done with OAL. Do you have a workflow for making up a cartridge? Or perhaps a link to where I might learn more about this?

Here's a helpful link for the more traditional OCW load development which can be very effective. OCW is a lot easier to start with if you are new to load development.

OCW reloading instructions

OCW reloading overview and instructions

www.ocwreloading.com

Regardless of which method you use, adjusting seating depth with precision and testing can make a BIG difference in how well a rifle shoots. Just need to keep in mind that getting the bullet into the lands can increase pressure. So either start in the lands and back away from them, or only shoot loads that are jumping to the lands.

 

[Lynn Jr]

Hi Sheldon: In an ideal ladder test would you first hone down on the charge, then on the seating depth? My concepts are on their head. I thought once you backed a couple mils off the bore grooves you were done with OAL. Do you have a workflow for making up a cartridge? Or perhaps a link to where I might learn more about this?

Hi Lynn Jr.: Where might I learn more about rising muzzle and declining muzzle? Sounds like another complication. I think the more I venture into learning about accuracy the more complex it all gets.

To both of you - very interesting, and thanks for taking the time!

I actually don't agree that Dan Newberrys OCW is easier or better for a new shooter than a Ladder Test as it takes 3 times as much ammunition to reach the same conclusion.
You can read about Dr Geoffrey Kolbe and Positive Compensation by doing a quick Google search.

A ladder test is to find the node in the fewest number of rounds possible and gas nothing to do with bullet seating.

A ladder test helps those working with non standard reamer designs various freebore specs and wildcat cartridges get to an optimum powder charge quickly so as not to burn up your barrel doing load workups.
For 95% of the members here who use off the shelf rifles they would be better off listing the make and model of there gun along with the chamberings and 50 posters could tell them what load works best.
I am doing a load work up on a 375/50 BMG as I type and there is no load data available for that chamberings unless I posted it.
A ladder test will start at 185 grains of RE50 and go past 200 grains looking for a node.

 

[Sheldon N]

I actually don't agree that Dan Newberrys OCW is easier or better for a new shooter than a Ladder Test as it takes 3 times as much ammunition to reach the same conclusion.

Send a new shooter with questionable fundamentals and a gun of unknown performance out to do a 600 yard ladder test and you can get all sorts of messed up conclusions.

Send the same shooter out to do an OCW test and they come back with a bunch of 1.5-2 MOA groups then you know you've got other things to work on beyond which powder charge to choose. Gotta know your audience here, most definitely not a benchrest crowd.

(No offense meant to you cerulenablue)

 

[Lynn Jr]

Yeah a 600 yard test of any kind and a new shooter makes no sense at all

 

[ceruleanblue]

Friends:
I feel confident regarding reloading but certainly not at the level you all have achieved. (First time I hear of Dr Geoffrey Kolbe and Positive Compensation and Dan Newberrys OCW.) Since I do some benchrest (6PPC), I use Wilson Dies, Harrels measures, Sinclair equipment for most all else. (Trimming and measuring) I'll certainly read up on the two experts because I enjoy this subject and the reference sounds intriguing. Regarding backing off the lands, I understand that a sizeable pressure spike may result if the bullet touches the rifling on chambering. As for the rifle and load, it's a 308 Win on a new Shilen 1:13 twist bull barrel. The cartridge OAL required is longer than fits the box mag. (I don't have the actual lengths right now because I'm not home). Bullet is a 168gr Sierra MK HPBT. Using Varget and Lapua Brass with a 0.335" neck bushing. I'm curious of any recommendations because you guys have a lot to teach and I have a lot to learn.
Enormously grateful,
CB

 

[Lynn Jr]

If your doing a proper ladder test you always start with the bullet seated to the longest length it will ever see in order to nullify any pressure issues.
The famous pressure spike you read about on the various forums is in the 3000-5000 psi Range so the entire guns blowing up stories are myths.
If your shooting a 6ppc with a 62-70 grain bullet using Lapua brass and fed205m primers and N133 start at 52 clicks on your measure and the node depending on the freebore of your reamer will be around 54-57 clicks.

 

[tsonda]

Thanks for all the info

 

[NamibHunter]

The benefit to annealing is consistent neck tension. It matters.

Agree that neck tension (and bullet concentricity) has to matter, at least to some degree. This is almost an item of faith in the reloading community.

So i did an experiment to test how much neck tension matters by using three different bushings in a Redding Type S full length die that have always given good results. Each bushing was 0.002” smaller than the prior bushing. A range of 6 thou in total, which is a LOT! Used a LabRadar to measure speed (should be accurate to within 3 to 5 fps). Always worked well before and always compared very well with Magneto Speed.

Could not see a statistically significant speed difference with 15 loaded rounds in each group between low, medium and very high neck tension. [Barrel temp seems to have a bigger impact than bushing size.]

Yes bushing size affected neck tension as measured by the K&M Arbor press with the force measurement tip, as expected. It measures the bullet seating force in pounds. But i could not detect a clear difference in speed or group size between the three groups. A plot of seating force (presumably the same force is needed to push the bullet out of the neck), versus speed was a scatter plot with no clear relationship, just totally random. Not at all what i expected!

Then ‘varied’ concentricity by using all my old dies, from the cheap $30 RCBS hunting die (terrible quality), the much better Lee die, and the superb $200 plus Redding Type S. Some of these dies totally suck and give bullet runout between 5 and 10 thou. [Of course, neck tension would also be different. So not a clean experiment.] Others like the Lee are in the 2-3 thou range, Wilson was best at <1.5 thou. Plotted a graph of concentricity vs distance from center of target, shooting one shot per target, and it was a totally random scatterplot - no obvious relationship, just a jumble of dots on an Excel graph. Same for speed. Once again, this was very surprising.

After some further detailed analysis, considered as a group of 30, a group of loaded rounds with concentricity better than 3 thou gave an average (computed) group size around 1/3 smaller than a group of 30 rounds with concentricity between 3 and 6 thou. Same/similar for a group that had concentricity between 6 and 10 thou. So yes there is a moderate but useful improvement from maintaining good / adequate concentricity, but it is not as significant as most people think! Some rounds with very bad concentricity shot very well. Yes: All the bad fliers were caused by the worst offenders in terms of concentricity.

So, on a bulk basis, if you can load ammo with concentricity of less than 3 thou, you are good enough in the guns we shoot. [The BR game will have different requirements, but who cares.]

Also tested out my shiny new AMP annealing machine: annealed one group after every shot, another group was annealed every 3 shots, and another was not annealed for 5 shots. I saw no real difference. Very disappointing after paying $1,100 for the AMP machine! The brass was worked very little, typically three reloads via neck sizing only, then a full length resize bumping the shoulder only 2 thou. SD remained in the 5 to 9 fps range amd did not correlate with ‘reloads since last annealing step’. I also concluded that annealing is overrated. Big big surprise!

From prior to experience, a good scale does make a difference, but 0.05 grain accuracy is adequate, which is the weight of two granules of powder, and you do not really need 0.02 grain accuracy (one granule). Yes i tested this: As long as you stay in the ‘node’ this remains true. Other factors like primer consistency, bullet shape and seating depth errors are more significant. Work on that first.

I did this experimental work with great care and attention, measuring and writing down everything. Result were very far from what i expected, and a real surprise.

In the latest Bryan Litz book, he also found no correlation between annealing or not annealing and speed (barrel fouling was the dominant influence). [Not a clean experiment either. Bad pun intended.]

There are too many 100 year old myths in our sport! And these myths cost us reloaders a lot of money. We buy far more equipment than we truly need.

Respectfully.

 

[1J04]

Is this still available?

 

[supercorndogs]

Buy a chronograph. IMO you should develop your load first by chronograph, then by accuracy of the load.

Why you may ask? But OCW...but ladder test...but...but...

You could have a quarter minute group at 100yds, if your SD is 30 and ES is 60 your consistency downrange at 600-1k is going to start being a problem. Particularly on a benchrest type target rather than a big steel target that can eat up some of the velocity error.

Start with a load that looks good on the Chrono, then see if you like the group size. If you subscribe to the whole barrel timing theory with ladders and OCW where we want the bullet to exit the muzzle while the vibration wave in the barrel is farthest away this should resonate.

If the bullet exits as the shockwave is present at the muzzle, so the theory goes, you get poor accuracy as the muzzle is vibrating on bullet exit.

I don't believe, absent a mechanical issue with the chambering job, barrel material, etc. that it's possible to achieve a consistent, low SD/ES load that doesn't shoot well. Consistency begets a tight shooting rifle.

Now if the chamber isn't concentric and bullets are jumping into the bore at angles or your crown is fucked up sure, but soley on the basis of the load, consistency matters.

Think about OCW tests. You're looking for bullet impacts on target with low vertical dispersion. What's the primary cause of vertical dispersion? At distance, it's variance in muzzle velocity.

I'm not saying don't check for accuracy, I've worked up a consistent load on Chrono that wouldn't group well. It was a factory Remington barrel. Shit chamber job. Rebarreled and had the action worked on, now it's a hammer.

The point is, don't waste time on group size at 100yds only to realize later your SD/ES suck and you're starting over.

Edited to add annealing is a waste of time and money unless you're well over ten reloads on the brass.

In an OCW test, you are looking for a common POI across several charge weights, not low vertical dispersion in groups.

OCW instructions - Dan Newberry's OCW Load Development System

Dan Newberry OCW or Optimal Charge Weight Load Development method or system for handloading, reloading, bullets, brass, powder, primers, accurate handloads.

optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com

Instructions 14 and 15

 

[LawnMM]

In an OCW test, you are looking for a common POI across several charge weights, not low vertical dispersion in groups.

I never said low vertical dispersion in groups, I said low vertical dispersion of impacts (from different charge weights is a given).

You're arguing the same thing.

 

[308pirate]

Buy a chronograph. IMO you should develop your load first by chronograph, then by accuracy of the load.

Why you may ask? But OCW...but ladder test...but...but...

You could have a quarter minute group at 100yds, if your SD is 30 and ES is 60 your consistency downrange at 600-1k is going to start being a problem. Particularly on a benchrest type target rather than a big steel target that can eat up some of the velocity error.

Start with a load that looks good on the Chrono, then see if you like the group size. If you subscribe to the whole barrel timing theory with ladders and OCW where we want the bullet to exit the muzzle while the vibration wave in the barrel is farthest away this should resonate.

If the bullet exits as the shockwave is present at the muzzle, so the theory goes, you get poor accuracy as the muzzle is vibrating on bullet exit.

I don't believe, absent a mechanical issue with the chambering job, barrel material, etc. that it's possible to achieve a consistent, low SD/ES load that doesn't shoot well. Consistency begets a tight shooting rifle.

Now if the chamber isn't concentric and bullets are jumping into the bore at angles or your crown is fucked up sure, but soley on the basis of the load, consistency matters.

Think about OCW tests. You're looking for bullet impacts on target with low vertical dispersion. What's the primary cause of vertical dispersion? At distance, it's variance in muzzle velocity.

I'm not saying don't check for accuracy, I've worked up a consistent load on Chrono that wouldn't group well. It was a factory Remington barrel. Shit chamber job. Rebarreled and had the action worked on, now it's a hammer.

The point is, don't waste time on group size at 100yds only to realize later your SD/ES suck and you're starting over.

Edited to add annealing is a waste of time and money unless you're well over ten reloads on the brass.

[/thread]

 

[jafo96]

I have a hard time understanding the benefit of a traditional ladder test where nodes are defined by velocity and barrel whip vs a Satterlee Velocity test. Is the ladder test more for fixed distances? Wouldn’t a consistent velocity node be most consistent at various distances?

 

[Fig]

Honestly, this is where you should start.

The Book of Rifle Accuracy: Tony Boyer: 9780982678800: Amazon.com: Books

The Book of Rifle Accuracy [Tony Boyer] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Book of Rifle Accuracy

www.amazon.com

Then read this one...

Handloading for Competition Making the Target Bigger.: Glen D. Zediker: 9780962692598: Amazon.com: Books

Handloading for Competition Making the Target Bigger. [Glen D. Zediker] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Handloading for Competition Making the Target Bigger.

www.amazon.com

I have to say that I think most hand loaders in our world use 80% of the stuff that was pioneered in the BR world. We like very small groups too, but for us that's not the end it's just the beginning.

 

[NamibHunter]

I wonder how much of the BR techniques are truly applicable to our world (SAAMI spec chambers, standard dies, so not using custom dies cut with the same reamer, no tight necks)...

Reading Mr. Glenn Z’s book. Will see if i emerge any wiser on the other side!