Tract toric 4.5-30 vs razor gen 3

The Tract dies have German Schott glass. I have the tract 4-20 and the tracking is dead nuts so far. I’ve started doing club level F-TR matches and the 4-20 suits me perfectly. I’ve not looked thru a Gen 3 yet. But I like the glass in my Tract better, than my buddy’s Gen 2 Razor.
 
Last edited:
I had a Gen 2 razor and have 2 tract torric 4-20. I liked my razor but it was heavy and i thought the eye relief could be better. I think the glass quality is better on the tracts and i really like the feel of the turrets. The razors turrets were very nice too but for me, i like the tracts better than the razor. I know you were wanting a comparison to the gen 3 but hopefully this is helpful
 
Anyone have experience with the 4-20 tract vs the mk5 5-25? Or the 4.5-30 tract? I have the 5-25 mk5 right now, but am debating making the switch and saving some money. I don’t really shoot past 18x very often. Shot a 600 yard f open match today mostly on 10x lol.
 
Here’s some non-fake input. I have a Toric 4.5-30, Bushy XRS3, Bushy XRS2, Delta Stryker 4.5-30, and a Razor Gen 2, plus a pile of other LOW scopes. Flip a coin, but I personally feel the Razor Gen2 is overrated, especially at their price point as of late. I don’t regret my purchase because I bought from Liberty Optics before the price hike, but I wouldn’t chose it over the Toric or Stryker if one needed illumination. Otherwise Bushy XRS3 all day for 500+ for me. I have 20/10 vision and I am not sensitive to chromatic aberrations and other “issues” people talk about, so as with all things, these statements are relative to me. I have had folks look through my optics and they each have their own preference. You really need to put your eye up to each piece and let YOUR eyes and brain decide, not some jokers or salesmen on a forum.