Treasonous Supreme Court refuses to hear latest AZ. case showing voter fraud
- Thread starter TexPatriot
- Start date
I don't know why they think they need to pack the courts. Nine compromised, corrupt fuckers is plenty.
I find the idea of dismissing a case without comment, just fucking annoying. I know there are reasons, but makes me wish in my job I could opt-in to the idea of:
Boss (the people) : "I have something you need to look at and investigate and comment on.."
Me (SCOTUS) : "I am not doing that"
Boss (the people) : "FML"
Boss (the people) : "I have something you need to look at and investigate and comment on.."
Me (SCOTUS) : "I am not doing that"
Boss (the people) : "FML"
Same old shit. Old, out of touch people telling us what to do. Sounds like......my whole life.
Whaaaat?! The gov run courts are refusing to put the gov on trial and rule against itself? Nooo?! This is my shocked face
Man i wish i could just refuse to do all the actually important aspects of my job and just get away with it.
If you have a taxpayer paid job then you can. If not then you can’t. The sorriest people on earth, govt workers and inmates, feed off the taxpayer.
The SC is now as trustworthy as the FBI
that was sort of a worthless effort, sorry.
eyes on the target and maricopa will tell us enough, or not.
eyes on the target and maricopa will tell us enough, or not.
Why does anybody have any faith in a single government institution ?
The only faith any of us should have is in the total Corruption of all government !
Every level from local to state to Federal is corrupt , As is all the media and big corporations .
Roberts is compromised or a coward . probably both .
Never trust the dirty black robed bastards !
The only faith any of us should have is in the total Corruption of all government !
Every level from local to state to Federal is corrupt , As is all the media and big corporations .
Roberts is compromised or a coward . probably both .
Never trust the dirty black robed bastards !
Is this the same FBI that participated in the coup of a sitting President?
So now the Supreme Court has also participated in the coup of a sitting President.
This is the message that Americans need to hear and understand. The right wing talk radio bullshit has to stop.
And this is the government that is pushing hard to inject you with their mystery chemicals, spearheaded by the same weasel doctor and software pirate that were involved in the manufacturing of the virus.
Last edited:
I can promise you, the SC doesn't want to make any waves that might piss off the left until after the 2022 election to see which way the wind blows. If the left retains power, the SC knows without a doubt that they will pack the court. If the right retakes the house/senate, they aren't as worried about that coming down on them. Even the leftist justices dont want the court packed. Im not saying this is right, but i will bet a dollar to a donut that this is true. I wish they just wouldn't take any cases until after the next election, then when the right sweeps the left, they keep a busy schedule of hearing cases.
Who the fuck cares? 2A is pretty clear and is the law of the land until they go through a constitutional amendment process, which ain’t going to happen. So they can do or say whatever. It doesn’t mean anything. They don’t write laws!
Does it really matter? Until enough people wake up and take action, no amount of evidence will change anything.
Hence is a large fucking problem of the government. Strategize to not do a bunch of shit basically while we still pay them and they justify that we somehow need them to function as a country. It’s all bullshit.
Blah, blah, blah. As much as you want to believe, the person who filed the case was too stupid and too late.
From the linked article:
Earlier this year, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a ruling that agreed with a trial court judge in Pinal County that Burk lacked the right to contest the election. The reason given was that she wasn’t a registered voter at the time she filed her lawsuit, as required in state election contests. Both courts also agreed that she made her legal challenge too late, after the five-day period for filing such an action had passed.
From the linked article:
Earlier this year, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a ruling that agreed with a trial court judge in Pinal County that Burk lacked the right to contest the election. The reason given was that she wasn’t a registered voter at the time she filed her lawsuit, as required in state election contests. Both courts also agreed that she made her legal challenge too late, after the five-day period for filing such an action had passed.
Notice laws didn’t apply to those committing election fraud. Seems like laws are to protect the criminals as always. Burn this system to the ground.
Notice that the SC was correct on their decision not to hear this case based on the facts from the lower courts.
SC is doing a great job protecting their masters. The courts allowed illegal voting orders to stand in order to overthrow an administration but use laws as written to stop any attempt to correct. Fuck that noise.
Bring s case with someone with proper standing and within the law's stated time period. that's how it's supposed to work.Wow! Was that really what this was hinging on?
Not commenting on whether there was fraud or not but just on this particular case. That's how the law works, like it or not, so get it together if you want to be heard.
What do you expect? Remember, you are dealing with lawyers . . .
That has nothing to do with the nature of this particular case.
Why wasn't the plaintiff a registered voter with standing to bring this action?
Why wasn't it filed in a timely manner?
Your ire should be directed at her and those like her who didn't get the ball rolling in proper order.
I do understand what you are saying and I would typically agree. Why does the law as written apply for any case pertaining to election fraud, yet does not apply to any illegal legislation that allowed it?
These blatant double standards proves what I already know. The US govt and all its institutions are corrupt. Same for the states. Same for the counties. Same for the cities. This whole system is shit.
Please post video............................of you in handcuffs
Last edited:
I'd definitely want you on my jury. Don't deprive your fellow citizens of the right to have a true government skeptic on the jury.
OK, but sometime remind me to tell you about my attempt at jury nullification.
Does everyone understand that refusal to consider a case, means the court has determined the case has insufficient evidence, lacks status, or has no merit? It's not a "no answer" response ... it's a "no merit" response. It's OK to disagree with that decision, but it's still a decision. It's the court's way of saying "Previous cases on this topic were decided correctly, and any reconsideration by SCOTUS would result in wasted time, and the same result."
I don't know why THIS SCOTUS is so set against reviewing any case brought to them that is associated with the 2020 election. Is there a precedence for their action or is this Roberts flexing his muscle?
That's not actually true. It may be true in this case, but often they don't hear cases because they aren't interesting law, don't appeal to anybody on the court or don't consider an important constitutional question. The idea that not granting cert is a determination is nuts.
The problem is that the SC (and lower courts) refused to hear any cases before the election or after... to early, to late, no standing(??!?) and at this point 'it doesn't matter...'.
