• HideTV Updates Coming Monday

    HideTV will be down on Monday for updates. We'll let you all know as soon as it's back up and message @alexj-12 with any questions!

  • Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Trumpster ordered to pay E. Jean Parasite 83 million.

Isn't there a statute of limitations on things like this? It is shocking how all of a sudden these whores start showing up. Lets not forget that this is the same slime ball that said "rape is fun" and now we are to believe that she is all upset and distraught?!

This is nothing but for show, and the judge that is overseeing these "cases" should be removed for agreeing to hear such an obviously frivolous case.
 
Isn't there a statute of limitations on things like this? It is shocking how all of a sudden these whores start showing up. Lets not forget that this is the same slime ball that said "rape is fun" and now we are to believe that she is all upset and distraught?!

This is nothing but for show, and the judge that is overseeing these "cases" should be removed for agreeing to hear such an obviously frivolous case.
Yeah, she was being interviewed on a show and talked about having rape fantasies. But this judgement is technically not about that. This is defamation, saying that Trump stating that she is lying, in so many words, has negatively affected her ability to make money or have a career.
 
Why they just kill anyone that opposes them or has any dirt on them.....
Exactly.
IMG_4458.gif
 
Isn't there a statute of limitations on things like this? It is shocking how all of a sudden these whores start showing up. Lets not forget that this is the same slime ball that said "rape is fun" and now we are to believe that she is all upset and distraught?!

This is nothing but for show, and the judge that is overseeing these "cases" should be removed for agreeing to hear such an obviously frivolous case.

Yes, but they wanted to "get Trump" so much that they changed the law, just for him.

The NY "Adult Survivors Act", was written and passed just for the Trump/E. Jean Carrol case.

From the linked article:


The law opened a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors in New York to file a civil case against an abuser or institution that protected the abuser — no matter when the assault took place
 
Yeah, she was being interviewed on a show and talked about having rape fantasies. But this judgement is technically not about that. This is defamation, saying that Trump stating that she is lying, in so many words, has negatively affected her ability to make money or have a career.
And here career was giving advice. :whistle:
 
Raped in a Bergdoff-Goodman dressing room....and nobody heard a sound. BS

Raped over 30 years ago, said nothing in the interim, but just popped up with this shit when Trump started a political career. BS

And I wouldn't fuck that ugly bitch with your dick.
 
Raped in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room....and nobody heard a sound. BS

Raped over 30 years ago, said nothing in the interim, but just popped up with this shit when Trump started a political career. BS

And I wouldn't fuck that ugly bitch with your dick.
And even if I hated you, which I don't, I would not make you do that. What can I say? I have standards, sue me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baron23
Yeah, she was being interviewed on a show and talked about having rape fantasies. But this judgement is technically not about that. This is defamation, saying that Trump stating that she is lying, in so many words, has negatively affected her ability to make money or have a career.
So they think she could have made 83 mil being a whore?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 101st
I think trump with his little hands could have convincingly argued he’s barely capable of raping a Big Mac.

I’m sure one of his gullible trailer trash funded PACs will pay the bill. No harm no foul.

Hey, did Mexico ever pay for that wall?
 
Yeah, she was being interviewed on a show and talked about having rape fantasies. But this judgement is technically not about that. This is defamation, saying that Trump stating that she is lying, in so many words, has negatively affected her ability to make money or have a career.
Like that woke bitch was worth a leg hump. I wouldn't let my dog near her.
 
so let's get this straight....someone accuses you of a crime. you didnt do the crime, and state the person accusing you is lying. TO NOT SAY THEY ARE LYING, is basically allowing the accusation to stand and not defend yourself.

and they award 83 million? and that person is nuttier than squirrel shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 101st
We laughed at the inbred system in England and recreated it here in the USA. These judges, lawyers, politicians and justice department are all intermingled through marriage, ivy league school, the pravda media and business.
All five five branches are corrupt.
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Alphabet
Media
The perfect banana republic has been created because society is ignorant, fat and happy.
 
We laughed at the inbred system in England and recreated it here in the USA. These judges, lawyers, politicians and justice department are all intermingled through marriage, ivy league school, the pravda media and business.
All five five branches are corrupt.
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Alphabet
Media
The perfect banana republic has been created because society is ignorant, fat and happy.


Yaup, this case is one of the worst I've ever heard of. As I understand it, just from musings on the internet, the plaintiff attorney has history with the Biden family and worked with the judge at a previous law firm.

The judge keeps saying Trump 'raped' Carroll despite the fact the jury declined such a verdict - which is moot since this is a civil trial and guilt isn't on the table.

These will go down in history as show trials, if there's even a country left to have history of.
 
Yaup, this case is one of the worst I've ever heard of. As I understand it, just from musings on the internet, the plaintiff attorney has history with the Biden family and worked with the judge at a previous law firm.

The judge keeps saying Trump 'raped' Carroll despite the fact the jury declined such a verdict - which is moot since this is a civil trial and guilt isn't on the table.

These will go down in history as show trials, if there's even a country left to have history of.


I think I mixed that up, it's such fuckery it's too hard to keep track of how fucked up they are at this point - so in your face, all of it, at this point that's the problem. Normal people who don't track the news and court cases have no chance of keeping up with the amount of wrong going on.