Re: using a plumb line to align the scope
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cmacclel</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: abersfelderami</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How accurate is a 1" long bubble level? </div></div>
Working with those style of bubble levels for the past 15 year I can say that they are anything but accurate. I use to level our robot test stands with a calibrated machinist level and then check these cheap plastic bubble levels from time to time and tossed many of them out. If you have 2 and they both read the same you should be good to go.
Also if you only have one you can place it on a surface then rotate it 180 degrees and if it read the same it should be fine.
Mac
</div></div>
Also have a machinist background, though I'm an office bitch these days. Anyhoo, I agree, bubble levels are worthless. Somewhat worthy if two match. I had two I stole from a decent brand carpenter level and on an even and level surface I placed the two side-by-side and on the 2" vials, they were off by approximately 3/16".
Then I borrowed a Mitutoyo digital protractor/level and use that instead. Then I followed up with the plumb line and on my SWFA 5-20x50 the crosshairs were plumb and the tracking was spot on as well. That's the far extents of travel from topping out to bottoming and back to center.
I liked the digital protractor so much that I went in search for one online and found them for $200. Being as frugal (cheap) as I can be, I opted for the "cheap" one they have at Sears. A Craftsman. I tested it against the Mitutoyo and the farthest off it came was within 0.10 degree. I dubbed that good enough for me.
Here's the cheap azz product I speak of...
http://www.sears.com/craftsman-digital-torpedo-level/p-00948295000P