Well the 4th Circuit probably just gave us another Supreme Court Gun Case

[Franko]

The supremely anti-gun 4th Circuit just ruled on the Bianchi case involving Maryland's "assault weapon" laws and found that strangely enough the 2nd Amendment does not protect American's rights to own guns that scare Democrats. The ruling is pure gobbledygook but the interesting highlight is that it finds that military style weapons are too dangerous to be protected by the 2nd Amendment yet the historical Miller case provides that only weapons suitable for military use are protected by the 2nd Amendment. Hopefully the Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas uses this issue to end the entire NFA.

Now those of us that live in commie hellholes can get back to waiting and hoping to someday live like real free Americans do.


The link is for anyone who wants to take a look at the ruling:

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5854/attachments/original/1722968222/2024.08.06_114_OPINION.pdf?1722968222

 

[Blue Sky Country]

ALL personal small arms that are in CURRENT and PAST use by the military are defined and protected by the 2nd Amendment. And as a matter of fact, almost ALL rifles and pistols used by every military around the world has first been introduced in the civilian shooting sphere or adopts elements and innovations that had been first made in the civilian world. The civilian gun sphere has almost always been the ones to introduce new technology and designs that are only adopted by the military later. Perfect examples for this would be the revolver and the original Colt AR-15 Sporter. The Paterson and big Walker .44 saddle revolvers were first designated as the "Colt's Patent 1836 Belt Revolving Pistol" and the "Patent 1847 Saddle Revolving Pistol" before "M" designations for them would also be used to denote the Army and Cavalry adopting them as service weapons. The AR-15 was first introduced in 1959 as the modern ranch rifle and outdoorsman's compact survival rifle featuring lightweight construction that would allow it to be carried for extended periods of time in the brush or around the farm without it being cumbersome.

 

[Doc68]

Just stop following unjust laws.....I'm pretty sure there was a case back in the day that said all unjust laws shouldnt be followed....

Doc

 

[wvfarrier]

Notice how they waited until this session was over?

 

[Franko]

Notice how they waited until this session was over?

Yep. A whole lot of dirty tricks and gamesmanship going on in the 4th. They also took the case away from the 3 judge appeals court panel prior to a decision and moved it en banc to likely prevent an unfavorable pro 2nd Amendment ruling. We have seen this same extremely unusual tactic in the 9th Circuit as well.