So I was cleaning my bolt hunting rifle the other day, and I realized there were no markings on it other than the caliber (30-06). Out of curiosity I took off the scope mount, and discovered that it's built on a Model 1917 action. I'm guessing it's some sort of a sporter version of the 1917.
After doing some research, it turns out the 1917 action is basically bullet-proof, and people have been using it to build up much larger caliber rifles because the action can take it. Personally I've been shooting sub-MOA with it (barely - I think my best group was .982" at 100 yds with handloads), so I know it has some potential. I also know the stock is pretty sub-par and showing some significant signs of age (it's cracked in a few places). It's not at all accurized currently.
So here's my question to you all:
1) Should I keep it as-is and enjoy it as a decent hunting rifle?
2) Should I have it mildly accurized to bring out some of it's potential (bedding, synthetic stock, barrel crowning, etc.)?
3) Should I have it aggressively accurized by one of the usual top gunsmiths mentioned on these boards (action trued, new barrel, etc.)?
4) Should I change the caliber to something similar like a .308? I'm looking at getting a precision rifle in .308 sometime soon, but perhaps this could provide me with a good practice stick with not horribly different accuracy to a GAP or TacOps custom .308 that I've been thinking of getting.
5) Should I change it to .338 LM?
Personally I'm leaning on something in between option 2) and 3). I like the 30-06 cartridge because it's easily available, and shoots decently. Re-chambering it in .308 would be a similar situation. Other calibers may be less so.
Any thoughts?
After doing some research, it turns out the 1917 action is basically bullet-proof, and people have been using it to build up much larger caliber rifles because the action can take it. Personally I've been shooting sub-MOA with it (barely - I think my best group was .982" at 100 yds with handloads), so I know it has some potential. I also know the stock is pretty sub-par and showing some significant signs of age (it's cracked in a few places). It's not at all accurized currently.
So here's my question to you all:
1) Should I keep it as-is and enjoy it as a decent hunting rifle?
2) Should I have it mildly accurized to bring out some of it's potential (bedding, synthetic stock, barrel crowning, etc.)?
3) Should I have it aggressively accurized by one of the usual top gunsmiths mentioned on these boards (action trued, new barrel, etc.)?
4) Should I change the caliber to something similar like a .308? I'm looking at getting a precision rifle in .308 sometime soon, but perhaps this could provide me with a good practice stick with not horribly different accuracy to a GAP or TacOps custom .308 that I've been thinking of getting.
5) Should I change it to .338 LM?
Personally I'm leaning on something in between option 2) and 3). I like the 30-06 cartridge because it's easily available, and shoots decently. Re-chambering it in .308 would be a similar situation. Other calibers may be less so.
Any thoughts?