Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I ordered a couple this morning. I will report back with results.I use Sinclair carbide turning mandrels, but also have 21st Century TiN mandrels.
The new black nitride mandrel from 21st Century looks very promising, they claim "Hard as carbide, slick as graphite". At $28.50 for a mandrel I'd give it some serious consideration.
I have become a big fan of the new expander mandrel in Black nitride. Smooth as butter. Now the big question is for how long.I ordered a couple this morning. I will report back with results.
I had used a Wilson expander mandrel for 6.5 CM and recently acquired a 21st Century expander in black nitride. The difference in force was an eye opener. I dip the necks in Redding dry neck lube and then run them through the expander. Amazing how smooth the 21st Century black nitride mandrel was. Like a hot knife through butter.I have become a big fan of the new expander mandrel in Black nitride. Smooth as butter. Now the big question is for how long.
Refer to Post #8 in this thread.So I can use a 21st century mandrel in a sinclair body? I have been meaning to order some carbide sinclair but if I can save a buck and get the black nitride 21st I will
Any specifics? Seems pretty vagueInteresting about the new 21st TiN/Black nitride mandrel......I called directly last week and he talked me out of using it for expanding for neck tension like people are using the Sinclair. So I ordered the SS version in a specific size.
What was the reasoning? And were you talking about the expander mandrel or the turning arbor? Expander gives 0.001” of tension and turning arbor gives 0.002” tension, I believe, so if you were talking about getting the expander mandrel, he might’ve warned you that most find that to be insufficient neck tension?Interesting about the new 21st TiN/Black nitride mandrel......I called directly last week and he talked me out of using it for expanding for neck tension like people are using the Sinclair. So I ordered the SS version in a specific size.
Do you mean the die that holds the mandrel? If so, yes, it will take 21C mandrels. They're 1/2" stock mandrels. (Assuming you have a relatively recent version. The really old ones came in 3/8" as well as 1/2", back when the 17 caliber mandrels were smaller. I think they're all the same now.)Can I use a le wilson expander mandrel body with 21st century mandrels? Would be nice if so as I would just need to buy another size mandrel as le wilson doesn’t have as many sizes….
I tried out the 21st century. However there was zero improvement over the standard forester sizing die w. Button.
Yes, the die that holds the expander mandrel is what I meant. Thank you for your info tooDo you mean the die that holds the mandrel? If so, yes, it will take 21C mandrels. They're 1/2" stock mandrels. (Assuming you have a relatively recent version. The really old ones came in 3/8" as well as 1/2", back when the 17 caliber mandrels were smaller. I think they're all the same now.)
My forester die is was honed by forester. Years ago. I sent them brass from a rifle i no longer have. For my little test, I set the neck dimensions the same using a mandrel as well as just the button. Just as explained above. The outcome was the same the mandrels didn’t improve group size or Concentricity. Concentricity was measured on a Sinclair slant bed Concentricity gauge. Like anything, if your process works don’t change it. For me the mandrel was adding a unnecessary step . Your mileage may vary.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that why expanding mandrels are now offered in such a variety of diameters? So as not to overwork the brass? Maybe I'm missing something(?).Forster FL sizing dies make great ammo with excellent runout.... The problem with Forster and other commercial FL sizing dies is they excessively work the brass. And I mean, A LOT. Following the steps and measurements I outlined above, you can see exactly how much they overwork brass.... They are made to size all types of brass with varying neck wall thicknesses, so they squeeze the neck down A LOT, then the expander ball rips that neck back open... You get what you get with that system...
I had Forster hone many FL sizing dies over the years that I sent back to them with specific measurements I wanted the dies honed to.. I would measure a loaded round and have Forster hone the die to squeeze that neck down .004" under loaded neck diameter... That way in step 2, my 21st Century Turning mandrel would only be opening the neck back up 0.002.....leaving me with exactly .002 neck tension..
The problem with this is if you load different brass for different rifles of the same caliber, you needed multiple honed dies in the same caliber for each rifle.. I have honed .223rem Forster FL dies for LC 5.56 and another for Lapua... Same for 6.5cm Lapua and 6.5cm Hornady for my gasser, etc.
I got away from all this and just use FL Bushing dies with the expander button/rod removed that way I can choose the neck bushing I want to properly size that cases neck down .004 under loaded diameter then open it up the final .002 with my mandrel, always leaving my brass with .002 neck tension and virtually no runout.
This works the brass the least and is the least hassle to get the die I want and time it takes to get it.
Big shout out to L.E. Wilson FL bushing dies! They are beautifully made, take Wilson, Redding and Whidden neck bushes, have a super smooth internal finish and size like butter. My new go to!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that why expanding mandrels are now offered in such a variety of diameters? So as not to overwork the brass? Maybe I'm missing something(?).
I have a custom honed Forster die that sizes down the web of brand new brass .002". I sent it back to Forster and they said it is perfect. I tossed it in my junk drawer.