**It's a long one...so I apologize.**
I have a Sako M995 in 338LM that I sent out to have drilled and tapped for a picatinny rail. After the work was done, the rifle was returned with the rail torqued on. After a quick trip to the range to test fire, I realized that the front screw through the rail was not making contact with the rail--it was simply run into the barrel tenon until it stopped. I took a file and some sandpaper and shortened the screw until it could be torqued to spec without making contact with the tenon threads.
I was never able to get anything resembling a decent group with this rifle (3-4" or much larger at 100 yards) shooting three or four different bullet types/weights, different primers, etc. It has a very efficient brake, is mounted in a KRG W-3 with nightforce 6 screw rings, and I've had a SWFA 3-15, Nightforce SHV 5-20, and Bushnell DMRII and LRHS on it. Put 140 or so rounds through it simply trying to shoot a target that looked like a group with no success. I was totally bewildered by my experience with this rifle.
Anyway, long story short, I decided the other day to simply remove the barrel and give it a look before replacing it. After pulling it, I immediately noticed a gouge just below the last tenon thread, that's actually pushing a bit of steel out in front of the face of the breech. It's not giant, but you could cut your finger on it. With reference to the muzzle brake, the gouge is perfectly in-line at 12 o'clock, and I can only reason that it was caused by the too-long first screw torqued against that last tenon thread.
Do I simply chalk this up as a curious discovery and move on/rebarrel? Or could something like this be responsible for the difficulty I've encountered trying to get this rifle to shoot decently? Is it worth bringing to the attention of the smith who performed the drill/tap and initially torqued the rail on? I consider myself a pretty experienced shooter and reloader, but I'm no gunsmith. I guess I'm wondering if someone who knows more than I do about the mechanics of chambering a rifle scoff at that bit of damage or is it cause for concern?
Thanks for any thoughts/advice on this.
I have a Sako M995 in 338LM that I sent out to have drilled and tapped for a picatinny rail. After the work was done, the rifle was returned with the rail torqued on. After a quick trip to the range to test fire, I realized that the front screw through the rail was not making contact with the rail--it was simply run into the barrel tenon until it stopped. I took a file and some sandpaper and shortened the screw until it could be torqued to spec without making contact with the tenon threads.
I was never able to get anything resembling a decent group with this rifle (3-4" or much larger at 100 yards) shooting three or four different bullet types/weights, different primers, etc. It has a very efficient brake, is mounted in a KRG W-3 with nightforce 6 screw rings, and I've had a SWFA 3-15, Nightforce SHV 5-20, and Bushnell DMRII and LRHS on it. Put 140 or so rounds through it simply trying to shoot a target that looked like a group with no success. I was totally bewildered by my experience with this rifle.
Anyway, long story short, I decided the other day to simply remove the barrel and give it a look before replacing it. After pulling it, I immediately noticed a gouge just below the last tenon thread, that's actually pushing a bit of steel out in front of the face of the breech. It's not giant, but you could cut your finger on it. With reference to the muzzle brake, the gouge is perfectly in-line at 12 o'clock, and I can only reason that it was caused by the too-long first screw torqued against that last tenon thread.
Do I simply chalk this up as a curious discovery and move on/rebarrel? Or could something like this be responsible for the difficulty I've encountered trying to get this rifle to shoot decently? Is it worth bringing to the attention of the smith who performed the drill/tap and initially torqued the rail on? I consider myself a pretty experienced shooter and reloader, but I'm no gunsmith. I guess I'm wondering if someone who knows more than I do about the mechanics of chambering a rifle scoff at that bit of damage or is it cause for concern?
Thanks for any thoughts/advice on this.
Last edited: