Re: WTB: Cheap single stage press
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EddieNFL</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have. And AFAIK, there really is nothing cheaper than a Lee. I haven't put my hands on one, but I understand the Classic Cast is miles ahead of Lee's other offerings. </div></div>
I have. I had a Lee Classic Cast given to me when MidWay had them for $60. I put another $40 with it and paid another $20 in shipping cost to exchange it for my Redding Boss. I've never looked back. Would you like to hear how the Boss is so tightly fitted that it makes a faint <span style="font-style: italic">whirring</span> sound as the primer cut on the ram passes through the bore?
I doubt that most people really understand the function of Lee products in the marketplace. The following dissertation is from a posting of mine on another forum, which I'll, again, repeat here.
<span style="font-style: italic">In the marketing world, it has been recognized that there are a finite number of strategies. One is that of the low-cost producer. Every aspect of the business must be guided toward minimal cost to the consumer. Production, materials, labor, design and service must all be compromised to varying extents to satisfy that customer. The occasional saving grace comes with innovation in design and production efficiency/economy. Characteristic of the low-cost strategy is that there is only one producer that succeeds; the low margin makes it too unprofitable for all but the most cost efficient to survive. Richard Lee dominates in the reloading market, and no others can gain entry to the price conscious segment's wallets as long as he maintains minimal profit.
Lee has succeeded through design with three products. His Collet Die and Perfect Powder Measure are duplicated by no others. His AutoPrime's basic design is copied by K&M and Sinclair, both producers of upscale products that don't compete in Lee's market. If Lee were to upgrade his AutoPrime, Collet Die and PPM, accompanied by a commensurate price increase, he would lose his own segment.
The compromises in Lee's products are acceptable only to those who find his price attractive, with the exception of the three designs discussed. Those looking for service and robust products keep the other manufacturers in business. </span>
There are two other Lee products of which I typically speak kindly, the powder dippers and the primer-pocket cleaner. Both of these are essentially generic products that Lee markets successfully through price competition. Competing primer-pocket cleaners offer enhancements like handles or sharpened surfaces to differentiate them, justifying higher prices. The dippers, as far as I know, have no competition, completely dominating the market for that product. No one can make them cheaper than Lee, or, at least, finds it beneficial to their business to do so.
The man asked for cheap, and I offered accolades. Enter the critics.
Frankly, if I were in the market for a lightweight, inexpensive press, I'd opt for the RCBS Partner. And if I were in the market for a small but more substantial press, I'd again choose what I already have.
It's about function, not price.