Re: Wyatt's Outdoors Det Magazine vs Badger Ordinance
I have a Wyatt's DBM and have, for the most part, been pleased with it. There are, however, a few downsides and things to watch out for. First the mags are long, as has been mentioned. The mags, being single stack and the follower only being sprung at the back half, makes the magazine relatively hard to load, especially the ten rounder.
The thing to watch out for is that although the bottom metal is a drop in, from a two dimensional standpoint, I've noted a few issues that required shimming either the front or the back, depending on the stock, to get the proper specified clearance. If you don't not take the time to insure the proper clearance, you will then experience things like the mag sticking and less than smooth feeding. I've also noticed that on the stocks that I've tried the Wyatt's with, you have to take care to perfectly center the action in the stock or the mag will stick. I found this to be much less of a problem after I skim bedded the HSP stocks that I've tried the Wyatt's in.
My Wyatt's now has a permanent home in an HSP stock that has been skim bedding, and shimmed to me the specified clearances. The mag drops free when you hit the release and it feeds slicker than snot.
Still, I dread having to load the magazines. My next DBM is going to be based on the AI mags.