So, you're ok with the dead guy having his right to due process, a trial, or suffering a cruel and unusual punishment violated by the father's actions, but you're not ok when the police do it? The article states that it is unknown why the order of protection was dropped, so in this case, it's pretty easy to criticize the system as failing. However, if it was found that such an order was violating the offender's rights, wouldn't you be at the front of the line complaining that our overlords were once again unduly oppressing citizens again? I don't think you can have it both ways. But, with your keen insights and ability to judge things, you appear to have missed out on a promising career in the judiciary...
Ok, this is the part where you try to claim that I'm pro-police/establishment and maybe that I'm against people taking the law in their own hands when the system fails, or possibly pro-pedo. I just want to assure you that's not the case. Instead, let me reiterate: I'm mostly anti-hypocrite and failed arguments based on poor logic and hyperbole. For the record.
