Does the higher mag range Zeiss V8 in the 4.5-35 suffer anything optically compared to say the 2.5-20? Obviously there are many differences. Size, weight, etc. But I’m not interested in any of that. I’m only referring to their optical differences. If both are set at say 20x or 15x, will one suffer light transmission compared to the other?
I have a friend that runs the Swarovski here in the US. He says the 2.8-18 swaro is much better than say the 3.5-28 optically. Especially in low light.
I’m wondering if the same applies to the Zeiss?
Maybe others have compared the S5 models and can chime in on the optical differences
I have a friend that runs the Swarovski here in the US. He says the 2.8-18 swaro is much better than say the 3.5-28 optically. Especially in low light.
I’m wondering if the same applies to the Zeiss?
Maybe others have compared the S5 models and can chime in on the optical differences
