6mm Dasher
- By Sheldon N
- Reloading Depot
- 1155 Replies
I run 265 neck diameter full length die (honed Forster) and a .241 carbide expander mandrel from Sinclair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gotcha. Well, the way I think of it is as camping trip + rifle match. If you cover both those bases then you're golden.Anything not in the comfort zone, which would be home range where all shooting up to that point has occurred.
I’ll bet that there’s no small amount of gerbil hair mixed in.
Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions, and your patience. I’ll search around more before I get into it.Yeah mag length 2.830 for the 175s and a bit longer for the 177s.
I don't do 185s there is no advantage low BC for the weight. I jump to 200 SMK .715 BC, 208s okay, 225s better, then rhe 230 and .8 plus g1 bcs is where its at with 8 and 9 twist barrels.
The best powders are not always readily available.
22" 9 twist Bartlein 230 Atips 2600 fps single load, or put a long action on your 308.
The shorter the barrel the larger the handicap.
And 18" would be around 2800 to 2850 with 177 gr SMK...powder availability hurts this project...but there is always an improvement on any powder, but some not as much.
anything over 30-32mm tube is a no-go. ACOG doesn't work well.So what is wrong with just using the Burris mount. Doesn't it align and work fine with traditional 1-6 lpvos, which I thought was the preferred magnificent range anyways? Is it solely the larger 56mm optics that's the issue?
I'm still waiting to see a version for sale, that has a bubble-level mounted on the side of the slide.
You really need to get behind the 5-42 Gen 2 with my reticle in it!! The 4.5-28 does have a tighter eyebox but the new 5-42x is a fantastic optic some should be coming to the wild here shortly. As for parallax I basically don’t touch it all day during a match. The glass in the 5-42 Gen 2 is also really really damn good. We’ve compared it side by side with the theta and zcos and many guys have said the march is actually better glass. I’ve had actual users of zcos and Thetas come look and actually go that’s actually better than my scope is.That guy's a major fucking tool, I'd take anything he says or "Tests" with a huge grain of salt.
He claims to be an expert but I'd bet my bottom dollar he'd get his ass kicked in a PRS match by any random selection of dudes on this forum!
I bought a 4.5-28 when they first came out and I've put it through the ringer over the past 4 years.
It tracks true, verified to 1940 yards on my 300NMI, holds zero, and has really solid glass. Optically I'd put it between my 7-35 ATACR and ZCO 527, with a massive win in FOV.
The only disadvantage it has as a competition optic is the eye box isn't very forgiving, same with the parallax.
Not terrible, but definitely not as good as the 7-35 ATACR.
Words...mean things. Keeping it real, Brother!Sorry, but if the option of making the beast with two backs with a hot ATF Chick is not part of the deal.... then it's not a honeypot.
It's a sting.
Just want to make sure you know that a honey trap involves the possibility banging hot sketchy chicks with major career aspirations and no morals.
Sirhr
PS. You don't want to know what a mudpot is... But Barney Frank would be able to explain.