Greetings everyone, new member here. I'm not very internet savy, however I came across this website and see a wealth of knowledge exists here. I have a simple question: how is it determined that 3.5 moa exist between every mil in an M3A Leupold Scope? Every training environment and FM I have read always refers to 3.5 moa = 1 mil in regard to holdovers. However, i cannot seem to find this number in my own calculations. Please read my reasoning, and correct me where I may be wrong.
1 inch = 2.54 cm
100cm/2.54 = 39.3 inches
Therefore 1 meter is approx 39 inches.
Now that it has been determined that 1 M = approx 39 inches, the mil value for that range is determined by the following utilizing range estimation:
size target (inches) x 25.4/mils = range target Meters
(X inches)(25.4)/1 mils = 1000M;
24.5X inches = 1000M;
X inches = 1000M/25.4;
X = 39.3 inches
THIS HOLDS that 1 mil = 39.3 inches @ 1000M, and 3.9 inches at 100M
I know that 1 moa is 3 cm @ 100M, and 1.18 inches at 100M. However, i cannot visualize cm like I can inches so I still assume 1 moa = 1 inch at 100 M because it helps me visualize proper corrections quicker. The error in utilizing 1 inch instead of 1.18 inches only results in an error of less than 12 inches at 1000 meters, which will still hit the enemy that distance(and gets you much closer than using 3.5moa=1mil). I will give another mathematical example to illustrate why I use 3.9 moa=1mil:
(X inches)(25.4)/1 mil = 254M
X inches = 254/25.4
X = 10 inches
So at 254M, one mil covers 10 inches.
1 moa @ 254M = approx 2.54 inches
10 inches/2.54 inches = X moa for 1 mil
10/2.54 = 3.93 moa for 1 mil
Hopefully the math illustrates my reasoning. And yes, I have tried this formula for holdoffs on the range for both myself and others and it works much more accurately than 3.5 (for us, at least!). One reason I like 3.9 is because I can calculate holdoffs for wind and elevation quickly in my head without using a calculator by rounding 3.9 to 4. Keep in mind, rounding to 4 is for QUICK mental calculations, and has worked very well for me. When rounding, 1 mil = 4 moa, and 1/2 mil = 2 moa. I know this isn't for punching paper in a competition, but in that arena I don't think holdoffs would be used anyways. But it is certainly accurate within a moa.
Could someone please explain to me...how is 3.5moa=mil is derived for an M3A scope? Thank you for your time, I know it's a long read...Keep your powder dry.
1 inch = 2.54 cm
100cm/2.54 = 39.3 inches
Therefore 1 meter is approx 39 inches.
Now that it has been determined that 1 M = approx 39 inches, the mil value for that range is determined by the following utilizing range estimation:
size target (inches) x 25.4/mils = range target Meters
(X inches)(25.4)/1 mils = 1000M;
24.5X inches = 1000M;
X inches = 1000M/25.4;
X = 39.3 inches
THIS HOLDS that 1 mil = 39.3 inches @ 1000M, and 3.9 inches at 100M
I know that 1 moa is 3 cm @ 100M, and 1.18 inches at 100M. However, i cannot visualize cm like I can inches so I still assume 1 moa = 1 inch at 100 M because it helps me visualize proper corrections quicker. The error in utilizing 1 inch instead of 1.18 inches only results in an error of less than 12 inches at 1000 meters, which will still hit the enemy that distance(and gets you much closer than using 3.5moa=1mil). I will give another mathematical example to illustrate why I use 3.9 moa=1mil:
(X inches)(25.4)/1 mil = 254M
X inches = 254/25.4
X = 10 inches
So at 254M, one mil covers 10 inches.
1 moa @ 254M = approx 2.54 inches
10 inches/2.54 inches = X moa for 1 mil
10/2.54 = 3.93 moa for 1 mil
Hopefully the math illustrates my reasoning. And yes, I have tried this formula for holdoffs on the range for both myself and others and it works much more accurately than 3.5 (for us, at least!). One reason I like 3.9 is because I can calculate holdoffs for wind and elevation quickly in my head without using a calculator by rounding 3.9 to 4. Keep in mind, rounding to 4 is for QUICK mental calculations, and has worked very well for me. When rounding, 1 mil = 4 moa, and 1/2 mil = 2 moa. I know this isn't for punching paper in a competition, but in that arena I don't think holdoffs would be used anyways. But it is certainly accurate within a moa.
Could someone please explain to me...how is 3.5moa=mil is derived for an M3A scope? Thank you for your time, I know it's a long read...Keep your powder dry.