Vortex razor vs night force atacr glass

But if they were the same price and you told me after I sighted it in you were going to drop the gun then I had to pick it up and make a shot then I would want the Vortex.
 
But if they were the same price and you told me after I sighted it in you were going to drop the gun then I had to pick it up and make a shot then I would want the Vortex.
Uhh what? Theres multiple threads on here of a possible zero shift with the lht line. So id go NF for the complete opposite reason. I almost bought an LHT - checked all the boxes until I came across that issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schaaf
Just received my 7-35 Atacr, I've had the Gen2 razor and athlon Cronus (still have 2). The NF is really a terrific scope and for the price point, it deserves it's rank above the Vortex and like scopes (definitely better than the Kahles 624i which was my most expensive scope to date). For the $1000 price difference, I see it. Every aspect of the glass and mechanics is great. I might get another Atacr if price is right, but I think I will be content with this scope being my best scope and reticle and will be happy.
 
This comparison really doesn’t make sense? What is the use case? A more fair comparison is the NF ATACR 7-35 vs Razor G3 6-36. The LHT had a primary goal of lightest weight long range crossover FFP scope, if that is your goal then the ATACR should not even be on your list and if the goal is a large forgiving long range scope then the LHT shouldn’t be the on your list.

Look at the sticky about asking about scopes and give us a little more time to go on your intended use.

If your desire was to fire up the fan boys from both sides then you will probably achieve that.

If you genuinely want to know which scope has the better glass I’d have to say NF based on what I’ve seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M77 and Travis224