Perhaps. The last 41 years I worked was shift work, AF and airlines. My “day” shift, so to speak, isn’t necessarily the same as yours.
Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
Y'all are funny with your generalizations. I guess I'm a boomer. Wasn't even old enough to vote until 1979. Can't recall voting in any school board elections: didn't raise any kids either. I've always voted R, but turns out they aren't very conservative either.
Required pic
Attachments
The New Deal was a massive step in the wrong direction. But I'd say the Civil War fostered the behemoth federal government steamrolling over states' rights.
Well if you’re going to fuck it up fuck it up so badly that everyone wonders just how the fuck you fucked it up.
Border problem solved...
TBH, I would not have a problem adding Child Rape/Molestation as a crime eligible for Capital Punishment. To me, in many if not most cases, that crime is worse than murder (of an adult). That child is going to be still alive, but scarred for life (as if they had been murdered). They aren't old/mature enough yet to have developed the coping mechanisms adults have to get them through such trauma (not that it's all that easier for adult victims either). But, for me, what really makes Child Rape/Molestation "death penalty" eligible is the perp's motivation for it... whether it be "taking advantage" of a child's youth & innocence and inability to resist/fight back, or whether they actually find kids more "attractive" (the real sick ones). I'm sorry but creeps like that have forfeited their right to life, and need to be ended.
Last edited:
Not in the PRNJ it isn't! They have an "affinity" clause/standard in their Incest law. Those too closely related by "blood" or "affinity" (meaning in-laws, adopted, etc.), may not "engage." And you can't engage with anyone closer than your 4th cousins (first, second & third cousins are verbooten)!
