Yup and the women voters made sure they’re all disarmed so even when they realize they need to do the needful. They can’t
And I’m sure the police and military and getting filled with muzzies
The Greatest Archaeological and Technological Discovery of Mankind
- Thread starter LRRPF52
- Start date
And I’m sure the police and military and getting filled with muzzies
There’s a non Arab country that needs a couple nukes for that one and a long string of other abuses
The British? I mean they are responsible for backing countries like Kuwait, which the US invasion of Iraq was one of the pivotal factors back and forth attacks that led to 9/11.
BTW you know Arabs live in Israel. About 22% of the country is Arab.
This started as a Pyramid thing, wonder how Egyptians feel about the brits plundering their antiquity
Payback for the Egyptians plundering, murdering, genociding, enslaving and pillaging everyone else some thousands of years ago.
Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
I thought about this too.
They will fuck up everything they get their hands on either out of total ignorance or their religious zealotry.
Once they own Egypt (and they will ), I 100% guarantee they will use the pyramids and Great Sphinx for target practice with Tanks we left them in Afghanistan.
Still wondering if we’ll see the historical lies fall apart in our lifetime?
Looks like it’s happening now…
What’s next?
Looks like it’s happening now…
What’s next?
Well last time some one removed stones from the summit, was for more room for tea parties and other tourists. Which occured in 1798.
If you like Pyramid history this is a good one.
Theories of why the tip is missing?
Bullshit.
Hornady finally proved that the original tips of these things would burn away in the first 100yds or so. . . . prolly less cause pyramids already had a shitty BC.
Phhssssshhhh the "tip" was the space ship that was launched when the nuclear reactor under the pyramid developed enough power to launch it and achieve escape velocity.
Kind of like in the original Stargate movie.
Latest archaeolgical evidence is that it was likely not slaves that built the pyramides... but people who worked, were paid and in some cases treated their 'time on the project' as sort of community service.
Not that the Pharoah's were nice guys. And they did pillage, enslave, etc. But as living Gods, their people would have built them to gain favor with the gods in the afterlife.
As for aliens... Nope. Just lots of people with lots and lots of time. No books, radio, TV, commutes, colleges, board meetings, summer vacations... The man hours add up.... Just like the great Cathedrals, Ankgor Wat and Stonehenge... When thousands of people do nothing else for a hundred plus years... you get some shit done! Even with shovels and copper tools.
Sirhr
H
Straight from Wikipedia, so you know its 100% accurate.
Straight from Wikipedia, so you know its 100% accurate.
They couldn’t survive the supersonic blast wave from the Bradatvida wars with India.
Remember the Drona wars?
Either that or the Muslim hordes stripped the pyramids of all their high-value metals and stone work for their heathen mosques and Sultans’ palaces.
The proof that alien beings exist is in the fact that they’re smart enough to have put out a galactic memorandum to all fellow travelers to avoid this place like the plague.
Nordic rayship occupant monitoring his reconnaissance drones’ feed, reporting back through the subspace freq:
“Uh, they’re still lopping off each other’s heads, blowing each other up with chemical-based fire weapons, and using combustion engines for transport. They somehow managed to discover the powers latent in the atom. Wait, I see something more. Yeah.....they’re also eating their own feces. Maintain distance of 2 astronomical units, feel free to send ISR probes to confirm. Do not visit. Looks contagious."
Aliens 100 percent exist. We would be incredibly arrogant to think that we are the only life form that evolved in several billion galaxies.
Run the Drake equation.
But there is no point getting in touch with us. We have only been radiating for about 150 years. Not enough time for our emanations to make it anywhere that matters. And even if someone 'did' spot us, the energy budgets involved in visiting don't make 'drive by anal probing' likely or realistic.
I know... your post is satire. And you are right... we are probably not evolved enough to bother to visit.
But I'll quote Stephen Hawking... "Any contact would come from a highly-advanced alien civilization and would probably be very messy." (maybe more of a paraphrase....) The net of it is that advanced civilizations rarely do well by primitive civilizations. Will Smith and Tom Cruise aside... we'd be fucked!
Sirhr
Read The Three Body Problem trilogy by Ken Liu. Book two, The Dark Forest particularly addresses this.
there is a book-"rare earth" by Ward and Brownlee that takes the position that we are indeed alone,that complex life is rare in the universe. haven't read it in a few years so i don't recall their exact reasoning. has a lot of reasoning geology,astrobiology and astronomy. they say that primitive life is likely common. they don't deny the possibility of complex live. they just emphasize it's likely rarity.
fits what i think and what others here and everywhere have said. measuring distance in light years is mind blowing if you do the math. makes me think we aren't gonna get too far away. if the fact that we are alone and stuck here for all practical purposes we might start acting a little more rationally. LOL.
There are also folks who really think the Earth is flat.
Ok...
I've read Ward/Hash-Brownie. And think that they should stick to bong hits and worshippinig Crystals and amulets and claiming that we were created in 7 days by an un-explainable dude who noone can explain how he was created... I get it.
Again, math and common sense says we are not alone. As for religion... I am all for it! Mankind needs it as an organizing principle. If we did not have a god, we would need to invent one. Ok... I am fine if there is one. Or not. But if we all behave better thinking there is one.... because the existance of God makes us better at organizing a peaceful and productive society... then I am 100 percent for it.
Pro-Religion Athiests... I bet there are a lot of us.
Personally, I worship Physics. But folks who want to attribute things to a Diety... have my 100 percent respect. Because they are responsible for the precepts of civilization. So are physicists... But sadly no churches were built to physicists and cosmologists. No worries. We don't need them.
Now religious fundamentalists.... those crackpots are more dangerous than a monkey with an AK-47... Fuck them.
Sirhr
Nope. Never happen.
We are an aggressive invader species, just like all species that survive for any period of time. I cannot imagine that, if there are other galactic civilizations, they would be any different. Survival requires it.
At our current population level, ultimate survival of the species may well depend upon expanding outward. Turning inward can only have a bitter end.
agree but our record doesn't look too good for the likelihood of surviving long enough to develop and master the tech needed.
interesting. don't get your reference to the book and authors,but no matter. pro religion atheist? interesting might be a valid take. being an atheist with a very mixed opinion of religion,i put in my top 5 worst things humans have ever invented. other 4-government,direct genetic manipulation,WMDs in general,machines that mimic the human brain,AKA computers.
hate to admit it but i realize that some form of social control is needed,humans being the way they are. religion can and has,at times,been a positive force in society. it's historical record is poor at best. ie the Muslim conquest,the crusades,partition of India,European wars of religion in mid ages,extermination of most pre Columbian civs by Spanish,extermination of Scandinavian pagans by Rome,Gaza today there are others. yes,religion is often used as an excuse for a lot of bad things and minor things. stuff is often carried out by true believers or manipulated by various elites. religion should be a positive force in society but neutral as far as a tool to use as an abuse of power.
i will admit that the argument often made here that our inalienable rights come from God,not society,is a strong one. hard to come up with a more reasonable origin of said rights,which should be self evident.
One does not have to be religious to accept that Judeo-Christian Principles are the legitimate basis of a sustainable and succesful society...
And also recognize that some of the BS that Islam projects are against societal organizing principles... and are, at their basis. the seeds of descruction of progress.. being rooted in the 9th century, which was pretty much a disgusting era of genocide and buggery.
Religion is good for civilization. One does not have to be a 'Believer' to admit that it is an important element of societal organization.
Religion should be supported... even by folks (like me, I'll admit) that think the roots of religion are not supportable by physics. That does NOT mean that I don't think religion is vital to our civilization.
Ok, roast me... fight me... call me Satan. Whatever.
Sirhr
About 60 years ago I read a sci-fi short-story. A spaceship lands, a single being emerges and its intelligence is so far beyond human that within days he(?) is ruling the world. Short-story synopsis: Sometime later another spaceship lands, two beings come and take the first alien away apologizing to the people of earth. Seems the first had escaped a mental ward and stole the spaceship.
certainly nothing to roast there,a reasonable take. i just want to be left alone. sanctioned if i do wrong in BEHAVIOR,not what's in my head. Islam is a big problem as the only major religion that advocates killing and enslaving non believers. there is some similar in the old testament. stuff in Gaza now seems to have a religious component for the Jews. 10/7 sure did going the other way.
will admit that atheist societies have been problematic Lenin,Stalin,Mao,Hitler,communism in general. i willsay that those 4 had a religious zealotry form. Hoffer explains the process pretty well.
will admit that atheist societies have been problematic Lenin,Stalin,Mao,Hitler,communism in general. i willsay that those 4 had a religious zealotry form. Hoffer explains the process pretty well.
I'll respectfully disagree. The "radical Atheist" community is one that says "I won't live in a world with religion and will spend all my time destroying it... because I am opposed to it." That is a religious dogma. And the radical atheist is advocating BS religious Dogma... while pretending to be.. not religious.
There is also an atheist community that says "I don't subscribe to a diety, but I understand and appreciate the value of belief, even if it it is not how I want to view the world. . AND I recogize that belief and theism is actually a positive force on the human race and is part of one of the critical organizing principles of civilization."
Atheism is NOT opposed to religion. It simply asserts that there not need be a single divine being behind creation. It does not have to oppose the value of religious (especially Judeo-Christian) principles in the formation of advanced Western Civilizations.
The Ten Commandments are not religious dogma. They are the fundamental organizing ideas that have created a civilization that have put men on the Moon, cured many diseases, liberated continents, raised the standard of living, increased the median lifespan, harnessed the atom, created the Internet and, by extension, Snipers Hide ... and thousands of other things from the Mona Lisa to the Lamborghine Countach....
One does not have to be a believer to recognize that it was mostly belivers did this. And it was good. Even if we think it was Physics that got us there... not Banging on gongs and waving Incense. Not that there is anything wrong with that. But not don't have to subscribe to it to support its existence
Sirhr
Going to disagree with you here.
Atheism IS a religion. Very few of them are intellectually honest enough to admit this. The curious aspect there is they only seem to be opposed to ONE particular religion. The second paragraph touches more upon agnosticism, which is the intellectually honest "non-believer" position.
Similar threads
- Deleted member 10043
- Bolt Action Rifles
