Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it Colt or "Colt Competition" as the article states?
Colt already bought a huge site in Kissimmee FL.
With magpul, colt and beretta leaving maybe the politicians will think twice about the economic impact their idiotic legislation will have.
With magpul, colt and beretta leaving maybe the politicians will think twice about the economic impact their idiotic legislation will have and if they dont I'll enjoy a large number of firearms manufacturers moving to my state.
Took me a long time to figure this out but I did and it may help some of you. Liberalism is not a political philosophy. It is a mental illness and thought disorder of reasoning. And just as you can not impart empathy with a sociopath or persuade a schizophrenic person their delusions are not real, there is no amount of evidence, logic, or facts that will dissuade a liberal from their false belief system. They truly are zombies. Now, Dannal P. Malloy, Governor of CT and others like him who control them they are as sane as you are I, just evil. These elites have nothing but disdain for the Bill of Rights. These laws are not about disarming criminals. It's about disarming you. Now, are things making better sense?
Agreed and I add that since Colt doesn't have sole responsibility for the M4 now they are scrambling to recoup sales by supplying 6920's and such to Wally world. I predict once they get another huge govt contract they will shit on us civvies once moreI hope Colt stays consistent with civilian gun-ownership values. I remember a brief time when Colt was barely concerned with civilian sales or quality of their guns and they were mainly concerned with m4/m16 sales to military and LEO. This was pre-2001 so there wasn't a war-time need or anything, it just seemed like Colt was purposely distancing themselves away from civilian sales.
I hope Colt stays consistent with civilian gun-ownership values. I remember a brief time when Colt was barely concerned with civilian sales or quality of their guns and they were mainly concerned with m4/m16 sales to military and LEO. This was pre-2001 so there wasn't a war-time need or anything, it just seemed like Colt was purposely distancing themselves away from civilian sales.
Colt got their ass handed to them because of their lack of civilian sales once their government contracts ran out. They doom themselves if they do not do the right thing...that is, keep the PEOPLE happy.
I appreciate and respect Colt's reasons.
But I also believe that a company's, any company's, most key resource is the folks who crank out the product. If they aren't making the move, then no matter what the sign outside the new plant says, it will be a different company. Maybe it'll be a better one, maybe it won't, but the one thing for sure is that it will be a different one. My biggest concern is for the people who were Colt, and whether or not they will continue to be Colt.
The politicians will generally have a "Good Riddance" attitude, and will gleefully cut off their (and our) noses to spite their faces. The primary attribute of a politician is that to be successful, one needs to forget about that crap that involves learning anything from one's mistakes. They will not get any kind of useful message from Colt's departure, and will probably be disinclined to be of any aid to Colt employees who can't make the move. Their prime motivation is spite, and nothing good can come from something with such a vile foundation.
Greg
I don't think the Northeast cares. On one hand I am glad Colt is doing so much better and has the ability to move, on the other, traditions are changing. In all probability it will be better quality as a new site and new machinery will surely improve the Colt experience. In the 1850's the North controlled the manufacturing and the south had agriculture. Now the south has both.