Sooo are we going to talk about the 700 PCR?

I think its a step in the right direction. If someone is on a tight budget, its certainly a good choice. Ive upgraded the crap out of my Remington 700, including having it accurized. If I was just getting into this game though, I would save for the Tikka.
 
If someone is on a tight budget, its certainly a good choice. Ive upgraded the crap out of my Remington 700, including having it accurized. .

Why would anyone on a budget waste their money on a rifle that needs a crapton of upgrades when for the same money they can buy a Howa 1500 Bravo or Howa 1500 HCR and get a rifle that has competitive accuracy and is just plain better made right out of the box?
 
I've had my share and several other of their products. I currently have a CDL SF LE in .260 and just picked up a 5R, also in .260. The CDL was part of the x-mark recall, but is an awesome lightweight hunting rifle. I slapped a Timney in it and problem solved. I haven't even shot the 5R yet. Waiting on optics.

I'm not doubting your experience and you sound like a picky bastard, as am I. I think the world, these days, is run by HR and bean-counters. As far as current production QC, I'll reserve judgement and give them the benefit of the doubt until I see how the 5R shoots. If it doesn't, back it goes.

I buy them because I like to tinker and prove I can get them to shoot as well as rifles that cost a lot more. You can't really compare them to high dollar GA Precision like rifles, where they have much smaller production runs and a closer eye on QC. I have seen people griping about almost all manufacturers at some point or another. It's built into the system. The more popular a gun becomes = more sales = larger production runs = more tools that wear out = more chances of out of spec guns leaving the factory. They are like cars. Each one of them have their design flaws and it's just a matter of time before you see them. That's what fuels the aftermarket. I always buy my cars without the crap I know I will replace, like the audio system.

Meanwhile all the Remington products that I have either owned or handled were complete POS's.

With that said, my favorite feeling action out of the bolt action rifles I own is a rem 700. However it is a TacOps, so MUCH different than a typical Rem 700...

Like anything, you definitely get what you pay for. And with Remington, you are not paying for much...
 
Good point, I wasn't aware the Howa's were the same price.

The MSRP of both the 700 PCR and the Howa HCR are within 50 bucks of each other which means you'll likely find them for the same price at retail.

I will bet you that the Howa Bravo will be less than the 700 PCR and will be an incredible value
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tikkablk
Not a huge amount more money puts you into a completely different playing field with this:

http://patriotvalleyarms.com/deposit-john-hancock-bolt-action/

I know, shameless plug, but if we're talking about rifles that are "competition ready" then the John Hancock is truly competition ready instead of just having bolt on accessories and more tacticool names instead of upgrading the components that actually matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ledzep
The MSRP of both the 700 PCR and the Howa HCR are within 50 bucks of each other which means you'll likely find them for the same price at retail.

I will bet you that the Howa Bravo will be less than the 700 PCR and will be an incredible value
Got my howa for 1050. And I’ve seen them at 850 for the hcr from buds gunshop. Just an FYI
 
They proclaim all the "bells and whistles" of this rig, except one of the most important parts. What is it Remington, going with that shitbox Xmark Pro pile of ass? Funny how after only 21 years they start supporting their own cartridge (.260).

Honestly, whoever is running Remington needs to pull their head out of their ass. They are so behind the market in the precision rifle realm that it is just ridiculous. Not only are they behind in terms of product development, but they are getting their ass kicked more so, with the addition of Bergara coming on the scene and jumping into the PR market head first. Not much love for Remington these days.

That rifle better have a decent trigger on it.
 
Anyone that would buy anything from Remington at this point in the game is beyond help.

With their track record of horrible QC over the last 10 years, the result of products they've put out in recent history and the options available from other manufactures, all I can say is LOL Remington.
 
I bought a new Remington 700 police 308 with the non xmark trigger and steel bottom metal hs precision stock heavy 5r barrel already threaded about $1200. Before I shot it I ran a wet patch down the bore and a noticeable amount of metal filings came out the muzzle. Boy was I happy.
 
Old thread but everyone that has handled my 5r thinks I got it blueprinted and its a sub .5 out of the box. I did swap to a timney but for what i paid ( sold a 5.7 pistol and made 560 of that) I have less than 500$ into it minus optics (NF-ATACR). I sold the stock and bought a chassis. I am including the cost/gain of the 5.7 on it. I do readily admit that I might have gotten the one 700 5r that the dude making cared about but its a sweet gun. Maybe something could be said about the higher priced 700s, mine was listed for 989$ and my friend bought a 700 that was significantly less quality for 500$. I am sorry but that 489 in price was the stock.

Just a thought- comparing a 400$ 700 against a 1500$ rpr just isnt a fair comparison, given the fact that my buddies 700 5r is just as slick and accurate as mine. To get the 400-500 price point the cost cutting wasnt just on the garbage stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thecelt
Old thread but everyone that has handled my 5r thinks I got it blueprinted and its a sub .5 out of the box. I did swap to a timney but for what i paid ( sold a 5.7 pistol and made 560 of that) I have less than 500$ into it minus optics (NF-ATACR). I sold the stock and bought a chassis. I am including the cost/gain of the 5.7 on it. I do readily admit that I might have gotten the one 700 5r that the dude making cared about but its a sweet gun. Maybe something could be said about the higher priced 700s, mine was listed for 989$ and my friend bought a 700 that was significantly less quality for 500$. I am sorry but that 489 in price was the stock.

Just a thought- comparing a 400$ 700 against a 1500$ rpr just isnt a fair comparison, given the fact that my buddies 700 5r is just as slick and accurate as mine. To get the 400-500 price point the cost cutting wasnt just on the garbage stock.
I have a 5R in .308. I bought it last year and it is a great rifle. Smooth and accurate. I shoot it more than my custom. The trigger on mine was actually pretty good but just a little heavier than I like. Other than that it is completely stock and I intend to keep it that way. Sure wish it had a 24” barrel instead of the 20”. I would not be scared to purchase a higher end Remington 700. All mine have been really nice rifles. Sometimes its best not to listen to the internet. It is made up of mostly stupid people (not you guys of course). Lol
 
I bought a new Remington 700 police 308 with the non xmark trigger and steel bottom metal hs precision stock heavy 5r barrel already threaded about $1200. Before I shot it I ran a wet patch down the bore and a noticeable amount of metal filings came out the muzzle. Boy was I happy.
So did it shoot well? That’s what matters.
 
I have a box stock 700 Tactical in .223. The trigger was surprisingly good. I haven’t touched a thing. Floppy hogue stock and all, I put on a SWFA fixed 10x and it shoots like this with factory 55g fmj. 3 shot group

Pure luck I guess! I love this silly gun!

6643B999-3F48-4738-ABA6-0F399A079227.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lunchbox27
Aren't these rifles using the Yankee hill chassis?

I thought it was an in house chassis. Im also considering a pcr, Id like to hear from other owners.
Looks different to me

1587566232252.png


1587566248215.png


vs

1587566299830.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thecelt