Communist gets "other-than-honorable" discharge

I’m surprised and saddened that there is even the essence of communist sympathizers in the Hide.

Communism is not an economic idea.

It’s proof you have zero understanding in economics.




949B4031-5C72-4121-9ED6-BE740D170ECD.jpeg
549199EA-A28F-4448-8820-7030DC7AF970.jpeg
 
First, it's not that he had different political views, it was that he was promoting those views in uniform. If he had "Republicans will win", the result would be the same. He also as an officer was publicly lambasting his commanders, both military and civilian, additionally a big time no-go.

An OTH does not get automatically upgraded to General under Honorable, and a BCD and especially Dishonorable are rarely upgraded as those always come at the result of a court martial conviction. An OTH upgrade requires review by the respective service's Discharge Review Board, and said DRB needs to be convinced that the discharge was too harsh of a punishment and was a result of an exceptional mistake. An officer, especially a West Point graduate, acting in this manner with repetitive public statements against his commanders as well as foolish political promotions (regardless of what he was supporting) in uniform shows a firm pattern of misbehavior in violation of well known and often reminded articles of the UCMJ.

He got exactly what was coming to him and he was practically begging to get caught, and any appeal package he files in the future will quickly fall upon deaf ears. He still has access to the VA for any service connected medical treatment and can claim no real hardship as a result, all that really harms him with having an OTH is he is branded as what he is, a piece of shit who got kicked out of the Army and deserves no veterans preference.

Yeah, see, this is what I was thinking, I know there's certain things you can and can't do in uniform, but I just don't recall the consequences as being this high. Regardless of what he wrote or what he believes in. UCMJ is UCMJ. But it looks like they were using him as an example. I've seen that done.

I heard that OTH to Honorable was automatic, you only had to request it and that after six months, they don't deny the request. So it's a rubber stamp, at least as far as I know, I really never met anyone with anything but honorable, FWIW. Worst I got was a company grade Article 15. Roomie went to Levenworth though and got the bad discharge, can't find anything about him now and with him, nothing would surprise me.
 
Last edited:
A pessimist, and optimist, and a communist were enclosed in a pitch black room and told there was a black cat in there with them.

There was no cat...

The pessimist said there is no cat. The optimist said there is a cat and I'm going to grab onto it shortly. The communist said that there not only is a cat, but I have it right here.

All are wrong. The cat is both there and not there and can only be determined by measurement, ie, observing the cat...
 
Yeah, see, this is what I was thinking, I know there's certain things you can and can't do in uniform, but I just don't recall the consequences as being this high. Regardless of what he wrote or what he believes in. UCMJ is UCMJ. But it looks like they were using him as an example. I've seen that done.

I heard that OTH to Honorable was automatic, you only had to request it and that after six months, they don't deny the request. So it's a rubber stamp, at least as far as I know, I really never met anyone with anything but honorable, FWIW. Worst I got was a company grade Article 15. Roomie went to Levenworth though and got the bad discharge, can't find anything about him now and with him, nothing would surprise me.

You heard wrong, OTH is not automatically upgraded to honorable on request.

As for your commie joes, they’d have had accidents if I were in their platoon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redmanss
You heard wrong, OTH is not automatically upgraded to honorable on request.
Exactly, typical barracks myth.

Present day, a lot can get their discharges upgraded if they can assert their misbehavior was PTSD/TBI related, many get OTH for DUIs and other alcohol/drug/medication related incidents or mental health issues, with the Army's major commands being one of the worst offenders who discharge first versus transferring to wounded soldier care units and treating them properly. There's a few articles on this out there, I'll dig them up later, but that's not what this commie did. He has no PH to his name and one is certainly not getting a USMA appointment with a current severe PTSD diagnosis under treatment. Rapone will likely have zero grounds for winning his appeal, if he ever files one in the first place, because a major part of getting the upgrade is accepting fault and acknowledging he was wrong in what he did. Commies are never apologetic for their actions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fig and QuietShootr
I’m surprised and saddened that there is even the essence of communist sympathizers in the Hide.

The KGB and Comintern have done their job well over the last 60 years. Their ideology is planted so deep ordinary American 25-year-olds say shit like “it’s just another political philosophy, they’re just kids, pure Communism has never been tried, etc, etc, etc...”

You guys that think that shit, you need to know that YOU even entertaining those ideas is something that was planned. Read up on the “Long March Through the Institutions.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
Strange that a Communist will believe the non existant cat exists yet they deny time after time the failure of Communism as proof that Communism sucks.

Are these people retarded?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
Yes. They are retarded misanthropes. They project their own worthlessness and self loathing on the world around them and everyone in it, exactly like Carl Marx did. Essentially it is a solipsistic, legalized justification for theft and graft on a national or global scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: j-huskey
Yes. They are retarded misanthropes. They project their own worthlessness and self loathing on the world around them and everyone in it, exactly like Carl Marx did. Essentially it is a solipsistic, legalized justification for theft and graft on a national or global scale.

I think you might have spit a little when you said "solipsistic" as you were typing, wipe your keyboard off.
 
There both is a cat and there is no cat, nobody will know for sure until someone turns on the lights and looks.

In the case of the cat it "can" and "cant be" and that will still make sense.

The danger is trying to make that same argument in regards to God.

In the case of God there is something else - Reward.

It has been philosophized should one believe in God?

The answer is yes because there is no penalty for believing and being wrong while on the other hand to deny and than face consequences would put one in jeopardy.

There are only positives likely to come from a God fearing existence - living a moral life and the goodness that may bring. while not believing entails living an amoral life and the pain that may bring.

In the end if there is no God you will still be a person of honor while for the other you are either remembered as a scoundrel or damned to Hell.

Someone let the Pope know by the way there is a Hell.
 
There are only positives likely to come from a God fearing existence - living a moral life and the goodness that may bring. while not believing entails living an amoral life and the pain that may bring.

In the end if there is no God you will still be a person of honor while for the other you are either remembered as a scoundrel or damned to Hell.

Someone let the Pope know by the way there is a Hell.

Respectfully, and realizing we may bet a time out for religion:

That is so wrong.

I 100% respect your choice.

To me it is immaterial whether there is a deity or not. I choose, by my own free will, to live a life of honor. I choose to treat my fellow man, as far as possible, with respect and kindness neither because I fear punishment, nor anticipate reward, but because I know that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I know that as I plant in the field of life, I reap, just as I reap pumpkins from pumpkins, apples from apples. So since I want kindness from others, I offer that.

When I need, I give.

If there is a deity, then it should respect my actions and welcome me home. If not, I have the certain knowledge that I chose an honorable life.

Hell, is what you create fr yourself, by not living a life of honor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jperk0278
This is Greg's box, not Schrodinger's. Greg doesn't have a cat in his box; Schrodinger may or may not.
How do you know who's box it is if you don't look at it? Alas, that's enough paradoxes for one day, maybe I'll kick the idea around tomorrow while I'm fishing if it's slow.

The only thing relevant then is there's a commie in the box. All commies belong in a box. It's the best place for them. I hope Rapone rides that bike of his out this way for the Sturgis rally and tells some of the fine fellows there that communism will win, maybe then he can find his way into a box too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pmclaine
Respectfully, and realizing we may bet a time out for religion:

That is so wrong.

I 100% respect your choice.

To me it is immaterial whether there is a deity or not. I choose, by my own free will, to live a life of honor. I choose to treat my fellow man, as far as possible, with respect and kindness neither because I fear punishment, nor anticipate reward, but because I know that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I know that as I plant in the field of life, I reap, just as I reap pumpkins from pumpkins, apples from apples. So since I want kindness from others, I offer that.

When I need, I give.

If there is a deity, then it should respect my actions and welcome me home. If not, I have the certain knowledge that I chose an honorable life.

Hell, is what you create fr yourself, by not living a life of honor.

Sure.

The example I gave simplifies things.

It appeals to the purely rational that stakes their decision making on just the cost/benefit analysis.

There are all sorts of reasons to argue for and against a deity but on the most simple of levels this argument is hard to argue against.

Its like a pure gamblers decision.

The odds are better to believe than not believe based on outcomes.
 
How do you know who's box it is if you don't look at it? Alas, that's enough paradoxes for one day, maybe I'll kick the idea around tomorrow while I'm fishing if it's slow.

The only thing relevant then is there's a commie in the box. All commies belong in a box. It's the best place for them. I hope Rapone rides that bike of his out this way for the Sturgis rally and tells some of the fine fellows there that communism will win, maybe then he can find his way into a box too.

Why waste a bag. Just let the maggots have him.o_O
 
Sure.

The example I gave simplifies things.

It appeals to the purely rational that stakes their decision making on just the cost/benefit analysis.

There are all sorts of reasons to argue for and against a deity but on the most simple of levels this argument is hard to argue against.

Its like a pure gamblers decision.

The odds are better to believe than not believe based on outcomes.

But would not a just and compassionate diety respect ones actions moreso than whether or not one 'believed'? In other words "Faith, Hope, Charity, but the greatest of these is Charity". Yes, brother, Ive studied the book. My Philosophical background makes me investigate everything.
 
How do you know who's box it is if you don't look at it? Alas, that's enough paradoxes for one day, maybe I'll kick the idea around tomorrow while I'm fishing if it's slow.

The only thing relevant then is there's a commie in the box. All commies belong in a box. It's the best place for them. I hope Rapone rides that bike of his out this way for the Sturgis rally and tells some of the fine fellows there that communism will win, maybe then he can find his way into a box too.

Greg brought the box (room) to the thread. He said there is not a cat. The optimist is trying to convince the pessimist to help search for the cat. The pessimist is complaining the government isn't doing enough to free him and the communist it attempting to convince the other two the cat should be divided equally and he'll take a portion of their shares for the party.
 
But would not a just and compassionate diety respect ones actions moreso than whether or not one 'believed'? In other words "Faith, Hope, Charity, but the greatest of these is Charity". Yes, brother, Ive studied the book. My Philosophical background makes me investigate everything.

I would hope so.

We dont need an entire book though the examples and history contained certainly provide examples from which to learn whether times are good or bad.

Give me one post it note with "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" than have everyone live it we will all be in a much better place.
 
I would hope so.

We dont need an entire book though the examples and history contained certainly provide examples from which to learn whether times are good or bad.

Give me one post it note with "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" than have everyone live it we will all be in a much better place.

Amen.
 
Greg brought the box (room) to the thread. He said there is not a cat. The optimist is trying to convince the pessimist to help search for the cat. The pessimist is complaining the government isn't doing enough to free him and the communist it attempting to convince the other two the cat should be divided equally and he'll take a portion of their shares for the party.
I understood Greg's analogy perfectly when he first told it. I'm not an optimist, pessimist, and certainly not a communist. I'm the antagonist who keeps shaking the box to piss everyone off by further derailing an already derailed thread, because this hasn't been about the former 2LT Rapone in a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
I understood Greg's analogy perfectly when he first told it. I'm not an optimist, pessimist, and certainly not a communist. I'm the antagonist who keeps shaking the box to piss everyone off by further derailing an already derailed thread, because this hasn't been about the former 2LT Rapone in a long time.

Maybe he's the commie in the box. Until we open the box, he is both alive and dead. I say we open the box and stomp his ass until we know he is a "good" commie.
 
I understood Greg's analogy perfectly when he first told it. I'm not an optimist, pessimist, and certainly not a communist. I'm the antagonist who keeps shaking the box to piss everyone off by further derailing an already derailed thread, because this hasn't been about the former 2LT Rapone in a long time.
welcome to the Pit.
 
Some points:

There was a cat but the commie ate it -- he was starving like most people are under communism.

Billy Bragg is a commie because he sucks and has never enjoyed any commercial success.

Liberal socialism is communism in lambs fleece, so that it appeals to the sheep -- until it's too late and they are devoured.
 
There was a cat once.
There was a claymore.
There was some noise, smoke, and a hot smell.
And some pink wet shit spattered.
Nobody asked after that, about the cat.

Next.... ?
 
If it has consistently failed, and it has, than it is not better than anything.

It is fatally flawed.

It fails to account for human nature.

It works for short periods of time in homogeneous cultures usually under some sort of external threat.

Once that culture matures and gains security they move on to more complex productive systems i.e. Capitalism.

If you are continually on the edge of starvation or attack Communism works.

This is probably why it usually the system of choice in dystopian settings.

Yep . The only time it has any benefit , is when a large percentage of the population can’t feed and educate
themselves IE : state of Kerala and West Bengal in India . The kids get some food everyday and maybe
an opportunity for basic education . System begins to fail as affluence rises and human nature kicks in .

As for the subject of the OP , would any of you want a guy like that next to you in combat ? I’m having
A Darwinian moment thinking he looks like the PM of Canada .
 
No, you’re wrong. There is no cat.

No, I got this one right. You know what I'm joking about right? Schrödinger's Cat? It's a little bit different but the gist is there.

Okay, color me wrong on OTH discharges, I don't know exactly where I heard that but I do know I heard it from more than one person so it must be one of those barracks myths like you say. Wouldn't surprise me. Like I said, never met anyone with anything but an honorable. I don't have a horse in this race or anything and it sounds like some of you are more versed with the various ETS options than I am, so I defer to your explanations.

Still I think it's harsh what they did to him, which is why I think it was them using him as an example to prevent others from doing the same thing. I could be wrong, but an OTH is about one of the worst things that could happen to a West Pointer with an eye on a military career and would indeed prevent others from writing fuckall in their hats in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot