Light it UP...
Oh, and if you want to screw with em, your a Democrat, non-white, liberal nut job...
Harvard Gun Control Survey
- Thread starter GBMaryland
- Start date
Light it UP...
Oh, and if you want to screw with em, your a Democrat, non-white, liberal nut job...
Done, it wont accept my email address, has the word gun in it. 
When they asked for my opinion I stated that my views are my rights granted to me by the Constitution Of The United States Of America and was not an opinion!
I used a real email of somebody who's company went out of business, they took it!
Constitution grants you no rights.
It only limits government from infringing on your person and your rights.
The Bill of Rights only lists those rights spelled out for clarity the govt should fuck off and die if they mean to screw with them.
I just used a BS email of "[email protected]" and it let me go through everything.
Of course, I was a "home owning, other, strong democrat, agnostic, hispanic, with liberal beliefs and a masters degree."
Of course, I was a "home owning, other, strong democrat, agnostic, hispanic, with liberal beliefs and a masters degree."
Gun Control Stances - When asking how important is a candidates "gun control stance" shouldn't both sides answer.....Extremely Important?
My closing statement
I don't have opinions on self defense.
I have facts.
The fact is govt has no right to infringe on my right to self defense.
The 20th Century is a testament to what happens when a government disarms its citizens.
Take one of your history classes please.
My closing statement
I don't have opinions on self defense.
I have facts.
The fact is govt has no right to infringe on my right to self defense.
The 20th Century is a testament to what happens when a government disarms its citizens.
Take one of your history classes please.
I just love when someone on here finds us these!!
My answer in the free response section:
----------
When seconds matter, help is just minutes away. Disarming the law abiding means putting them at the mercy of criminals who do not obey the law in the first place. My safety and the safety of those who I love is far more important than any law passed by any government. If I am being threatened with death or bodily injury, I am not going to go down like a punk. End of story.
----------
And I answered "0" on any gun control initiative.
----------
When seconds matter, help is just minutes away. Disarming the law abiding means putting them at the mercy of criminals who do not obey the law in the first place. My safety and the safety of those who I love is far more important than any law passed by any government. If I am being threatened with death or bodily injury, I am not going to go down like a punk. End of story.
----------
And I answered "0" on any gun control initiative.
You know what Harvard ties are good for , you use them as reins when in the doggie position.
Those slide votes 0-100 don’t light up unless you move them. Make sure you activate them. Probably set up that way so it doesn’t register your vote on it intentionally for those that don’t agree and just pass by them. Maybe not but I’d hate for my vote not to require deletion when the corrupted results come out
Attachments
Oh and by the way, these guys are "Harvard University" research associates but they don't seem like they have a proofreader for their text. On one of their sign-up pages:
----------
...when yo sign up with us, your personal information...
----------
Word up yo. Dis yo boy BSC from da block. What's poppin' homie? Ask me anything, I am straight up, ain't no two face shit with me...
----------
...when yo sign up with us, your personal information...
----------
Word up yo. Dis yo boy BSC from da block. What's poppin' homie? Ask me anything, I am straight up, ain't no two face shit with me...
Yep, I caught that. I moved the slider to 10, then back to 0, and the solid red dot appeared. GTG.
Get an alternate email address and do the survey again. This thread should have a FIREMISSION tag on it. The people behind this project needs to learn WHY the RKBA is so important to us and we should be straight up in our answers. Professional, serious, and not yielding one single inch. We are not going to be disarmed because we will not be victims.
In the response section I reminded them we don't really get to vote to repeal amendments especially through "public opinion" polls. For very good reason.
Well, that was easy. Only had to move the sliders a few times and click a few boxes. Everything else - default at 0!
I selected Republican... I'm sure none of them counted or even got written to the database...
My closing "opinion" read as follows:
Gun control is akin to speech control. I'm categorically opposed to it. Just as Prior Restraint is unconstitutional as it applies to Free Speech, so is "gun control" to my Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Gun control is akin to speech control. I'm categorically opposed to it. Just as Prior Restraint is unconstitutional as it applies to Free Speech, so is "gun control" to my Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
I lied on a bunch of those questions (including giving them my zip as Hollywood, CA), but i broke down what the 2A meant, who it was written to, what it covers, and how it applies to 2019. Also told them i was non gendered and had a PHD.
THIS
I put em all at 1 just in case.
lol freakin libtards
Regards,
DT
Yeah that was fun, in the free text area I put
SHALL NOT INFRINGE you don't need to go to Harvard to understand what that means
but yeah will fire up the VPN and have some fun with this one
Consider this survey tainted
SHALL NOT INFRINGE you don't need to go to Harvard to understand what that means
but yeah will fire up the VPN and have some fun with this one
Consider this survey tainted
Yeah that was fun, in the free text area I put
SHALL NOT INFRINGE you don't need to go to Harvard to understand what that means
but yeah will fire up the VPN and have some fun with this one
Consider this survey tainted
When I was done, I felt like I shit in somebody's punch bowl!!
I suppose that referring to them in the comments as "Commie Eggheads" was not productive. But, hey, might as well. At least I was grammatically correct.
Cheers,
Sirhr
Cheers,
Sirhr
Next time call them "cyka blyat kommie kaviar-heads". They might decide that's hate speech and throw a fit.
Hell, I didn't reset anything............I guess I can do it again........used a made up email address, I was a conservative 93 year old Muslim, who was a second amendment fan...............fuck yea........it could happen........
I decided I identify as a Democrat for the purpose of this survey...a stong pro 2nd amendment Democrat.
Similar threads
