Loading a CAL vs BT10 bipod

Back Spin

Reformed Cheapskate
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 6, 2017
114
37
West Coast
Surprisingly, I’m finding shooting with a BT10 Atlas produces more consistent groups compared to the CAL gen2 I just got. This is with shooting a few different AR uppers in 224V and .223 over a few range sessions.

For me, it seems the slack in the BT10 allows me to get a more consistent load, whereas the CAL is rigid and I’m having a hard time discerning if my uppers with the CAL like a light or heavier load.

For those who have experience with both, was there an adjustment to be made when going from a BT10 to a CAL? If so what was the trick?
 
Apples to oranges comparison, but on my 17# 6.5 creedmoor tikka I don’t load the bipod with my cal. If I do it’s the slightest pressure. Seems to usually produce good groups that way. I treat the bipod the same way on my hunting rifle as well. The slightest amount of load and that’s it.
 
I sold my CAL and went back to the BT10 or BT46 for the same reasons as the OP stated. About the only way I could produce consistency was to leave the CAL unlocked, allowing some play. Anytime you have a tight interface between your bipod and stock/chassis, and load it, your are liable to put stress into the system which can definitely impede your consistency.
 
I’ll have to try unlocking / loosening the CAL next range session.

Shooting from a bench, I can tell my heartbeat imparts slightly more movement with a CAL than BT10 V8. The groups show it too. One upper will shoot 1.5” inch with a CAL and 1.25” with a BT10, so not a great difference, but it’s there.
 
I’ll have to try unlocking / loosening the CAL next range session.

Shooting from a bench, I can tell my heartbeat imparts slightly more movement with a CAL than BT10 V8. The groups show it too. One upper will shoot 1.5” inch with a CAL and 1.25” with a BT10, so not a great difference, but it’s there.

If you’re noticing heartbeat, that’s you, not the bipod.
 
Also want to add that I’ve seen the disparity in accuracy when I’m in prone and I do not see any movement of the reticle. And I’m not trying to load the CAL hard. Just trying to control the forward movement and no more (As @Kasey wrote in another thread). I do pull back into my shoulder a bit firmer with the CAL, but that’s because I saw better results doing that during my first outing with the CAL

It’s likely I need to practice with the new piece of equipment more, but I wanted to know if others have gone through the same thing and what adjustments were made between the BT10 and CAL.