Martha Stewart up much?

Gunfighter14e2

Hunter/trapper of Remora's
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 9, 2002
9,870
14,970
Lick skillet Alabama
eham.net


 
  • Like
Reactions: diverdon
This was illegal for about two months.

I think it was a bill Scott Brown sponsored.

Pretty sure when they took themselves off Ocare they again made it legal to trade based on their insider knowledge.
 
Congress ,Senate and the political cabal has always been exempted to do insider trading , you know trading on info not made public , that is/has always been legal for them .

Insider trading has always been name of the game for the elite .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tomcatmv
Congress ,Senate and the political cabal has always been exempted to do insider trading , you know trading on info not made public , that is has always been legal for them .
Actually, I believe it's now illegal. Not that I think any would be prosecuted.
 
Actually, I believe it's now illegal. Not that I think any would be prosecuted.


Nah, It was illegal for a short period of time around 2010 but they made it legal again by sneaking it in with another bill.

I dont think the language is specifically "Thou can insider trade".

probably something doublespeak like.

"No member shall be held accountable shall it appear through fortuitous chance that they made personal financial decisions based on knowledge gained during the performance of their arduous and sacrificial service to the people of the United States"
 
  • Love
Reactions: Mr.BR
Nah, It was illegal for a short period of time around 2010 but they made it legal again by sneaking it in with another bill.

I dont think the language is specifically "Thou can insider trade".

probably something doublespeak like.

"No member shall be held accountable shall it appear through fortuitous chance that they made personal financial decisions based on knowledge gained during the performance of their arduous and sacrificial service to the people of the United States"
So make the law, leave it in place, but amend it in an unrelated law. Sounds about right.
 
So make the law, leave it in place, but amend it in an unrelated law. Sounds about right.


Scott Brown had something to do with ending the insider trading.

It was a moment in time when the People had a say.

TEA Party had just rebuked Obama big time.

Than came Lois Lerner and Congress killed its accountability so they ended their enrollment in Ocare and the insider trading restrictions.
 
Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act into law in spring 2012 ,made it illegal but not for long

exactly a year later Senate and then the House passed the bill in largely empty chambers using a fast-track procedure known as unanimous consent. Making insider trading legal again

"Nobody gets results like [those of US Senators] in the financial world consistently and over the long term, any manager of a mutual fund...who regularly beats the market by as little as two percent annually is considered an investment genius."
Jan. 1, 2006 -
Thomas Ferguson, PhD


"[W]e find that members of the U.S. Senate outperformed the market by almost 100 basis points [One basis point is equivalent to 1/100th of a one percent. 100 basis points are equivalent to one percent.] per month...

When we equally weight the returns of each Senator, the buy portfolio earns a compound annual rate of 28.6% on an equal-weighted basis and 31.1% on a trade-weighted basis compared to 21.3% for the market...

Cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks bought by Senators are near zero for the calendar year prior to the date of purchase. After acquisition, the cumulative abnormal return rises over 25% within one calendar year after the purchase date. The cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks sold by the Senators are near zero for the calendar year after the date of sale. However, these same stocks saw a cumulative abnormal positive return of 25% during the year immediately preceding the event date. These results suggest that Senators knew the appropriate times to both buy and sell their common stocks...

After being sold by Senators, stocks underperform the market by 12 basis points per month on a trade-weighted basis....Combining the buy transactions with the sell transactions in a hedged portfolio we find that Senators outperform the market by 97 basis points (nearly 1%) per month on a trade-weighted basis...

We find no reliable differences between the returns earned by Democrats and Republicans but seniority appears to be important. Senators with the least seniority (in their first Senatorial term) earn statistically higher returns than those Senators with the longest seniority (over 16 years in the Senate)."

Dec. 2004 - Alan J. Ziobrowski, PhD



Chart shows, congressmen have historically done a lot better in the stock market than the average American household has. This suspicious outperformance is made possible by the widespread and technically legal practice of congressional insider trading.

congressional-insider-trading-1-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act into law in spring 2012 ,made it illegal but not for long

exactly a year later Senate and then the House passed the bill in largely empty chambers using a fast-track procedure known as unanimous consent. Making insider trading legal again

"Nobody gets results like [those of US Senators] in the financial world consistently and over the long term, any manager of a mutual fund...who regularly beats the market by as little as two percent annually is considered an investment genius."
Jan. 1, 2006 -
Thomas Ferguson, PhD


"[W]e find that members of the U.S. Senate outperformed the market by almost 100 basis points [One basis point is equivalent to 1/100th of a one percent. 100 basis points are equivalent to one percent.] per month...

When we equally weight the returns of each Senator, the buy portfolio earns a compound annual rate of 28.6% on an equal-weighted basis and 31.1% on a trade-weighted basis compared to 21.3% for the market...

Cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks bought by Senators are near zero for the calendar year prior to the date of purchase. After acquisition, the cumulative abnormal return rises over 25% within one calendar year after the purchase date. The cumulative abnormal returns for the portfolio of stocks sold by the Senators are near zero for the calendar year after the date of sale. However, these same stocks saw a cumulative abnormal positive return of 25% during the year immediately preceding the event date. These results suggest that Senators knew the appropriate times to both buy and sell their common stocks...

After being sold by Senators, stocks underperform the market by 12 basis points per month on a trade-weighted basis....Combining the buy transactions with the sell transactions in a hedged portfolio we find that Senators outperform the market by 97 basis points (nearly 1%) per month on a trade-weighted basis...

We find no reliable differences between the returns earned by Democrats and Republicans but seniority appears to be important. Senators with the least seniority (in their first Senatorial term) earn statistically higher returns than those Senators with the longest seniority (over 16 years in the Senate)."

Dec. 2004 - Alan J. Ziobrowski, PhD



Chart shows, congressmen have historically done a lot better in the stock market than the average American household has. This suspicious outperformance is made possible by the widespread and technically legal practice of congressional insider trading.

congressional-insider-trading-1-1.jpg


Its because the are so smart......I mean Hank Johnson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ravenworks