Trigger choice

I like single stage because I like it when I press the trigger I know it's going to go off. I don't want take up.

Either will work though and it comes down to personal preference more than anything.
 
Personally I feel you have much more control (especially in less than stable positions, or extreme environments like cold or wet conditions) with a true two stage. You will be able to “locate“ the trigger shoe, take up the first stage, hit a solid wall in which at anytime you may need to back off the trigger and not take the shot you have a much more forgiving window to do so, or continue to break the shot. Also with a true two stage trigger you have SO much more sear engagement than on a crisp single stage, but beware not all “2 stage triggers” are actual two stage triggers some just feel like one.

If I ever have the option I will always choose a two stage trigger.
 
I love my single stage TT diamonds, but the two stage timney i had on my tikka was pretty nice. I plan on changing them out when TT finally releases their two stage. It’s just personal preference
 
I went through a phase where I liked 2-stage, then I outgrew it when I started shooting matches and found myself pulling through the first stage and having near-NDs because I wanted a light second stage. But it is really about what you like, and you may - probably will - find that your preferences change.

I see you are new (at least in terms of posting messages); welcome to SH. If you've been lurking a lot since joining, you know there's an incredible amount of excellent information here. With that in mind - I don't know what sort of 10/22 you have, but if it isn't capable of MOA accuracy as it is now, you might want to reconsider spending $250 or so on it. Get a beverage or three and a comfortable chair and take some time to peruse the Rimfire forum here. You might decide it makes more sense to sell or trade the 10/22 for an upgrade to CZ-457 or Tikka T1X or similar at the low end, Vudoo at the high end. Of course, these are all bolt guns. I can't speak to autoloaders; I know that there are some really accurate 10/22 or 10/22-based rifles out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charnicus
learn on an AI and you get used to the 2 stage.

that said. multiple years with a 2 stage and i run a TT Diamond on one rifle now. works just fine.

still prefer the 2 stage most of the time
 
It's up to personal preference. I have single stage on some rifles and two stage on others. I'm neutral to the point that if one or the other is on sale, that's the one I go with.

The one situation where I really prefer a two stage is when wearing gloves. The two stage trigger gives you the ability to get a feel for the trigger through the gloves on the first stage.
 
Personally I feel you have much more control (especially in less than stable positions, or extreme environments like cold or wet conditions) with a true two stage. You will be able to “locate“ the trigger shoe, take up the first stage, hit a solid wall in which at anytime you may need to back off the trigger and not take the shot you have a much more forgiving window to do so, or continue to break the shot. Also with a true two stage trigger you have SO much more sear engagement than on a crisp single stage, but beware not all “2 stage triggers” are actual two stage triggers some just feel like one.

If I ever have the option I will always choose a two stage trigger.

You can just put your finger on a single stage too. No real difference.

As for not firing, you do the same thing on a single stage by just taking your finger off the trigger. ;)
 
i feel like the only people who prefer 2 stage are military or otherwise forced to learn on it to begin with. its what they are used to. there is a huge learning curve to properly using a 2 stage. liability monsters created that crap. same people who think triggerlocks are good ideas.
i cut my teeth on armory issued 1911s. anything that doesnt cleanly break like glass rod is garbage to me. all ar15s need dropin singlestage 3lbs. or theyre trash.
 
You can just put your finger on a single stage too. No real difference.

As for not firing, you do the same thing on a single stage by just taking your finger off the trigger. ;)

Agreed. I suppose I am just indoctrinated completely to shooting two stage triggers from many many years of air, and small bore while I was young and now 20 years of shooting TRGs or AIs. I am not saying that complete trigger control is not possible with a single stage, that is all on the shooter. All I am getting at is a two stage brings a few more things to the table, whether they are a benefit or not is up for the end user to decide.

If you really want to see the benefits of a two stage trigger suit up and sling up and shoot some small bore for a while, or even high power / Palma, but IMO it is more noticeable in small bore. Those techniques will carry over to all but the very most dynamic shooting disciplines.
 
Last edited:
depends on what im shooting.

i really only prefer 2 stage triggers on precision guns....i feel i can stack the trigger and break the shot cleaner.

everything else its single stage for me..the triggers feel faster and i can generally shoot controlled pairs easier.
 
Definitely a personal preference thing, but as @jbell stated there is extra seer overlap on a "true" 2-stage. This gives me peace of mind, especially on a hunting rifle. To be fair it's not like you hear about regular misfires and match DQs due to trigger malfunctions on high end single stage triggers (like a TT). I also like that if I've got a 2.5 lb trigger I can tell exactly when I have applied 1.5lb (or whatever the numbers are) and just a tad more and it will go. That said 2-stage options are much slimmer and you'll pay more usually. So all of my non-precision varmint rifles and such are still single stage triggers. FWIW.
 
maybe it's the beer, but reading Big JimFish review made me think of something

the 2 stage is like shooting a compound bow. 'heavy' pull weight then you sit there forever on the second stage