KRG Bravo on Sako TRG-22

Bravo6

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Oct 12, 2018
237
58
South Texas
Has anyone tried this? The rear stock off of my Tikka KRG Bravo stock fits nicely on my TRG-22 and now I have adjustable cheek piece, has anyone else tried this and are there any downsides to using this versus the original stock?
 

Attachments

  • 20201011_192130.jpg
    20201011_192130.jpg
    187.5 KB · Views: 420
Could you please provide me with a link to their web shop where I can order an X-ray rear section for my TRG-42?

Interesting choice of action to go with. Last I talked with Krg is they are going to get caught up on the x-ray due to the new model release, and later possibly release the X-ray back half separately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bravo6
That’s like putting a $500 set of Chinese wheels on a Lamborghini.
Keep on pedaling bicycle boy...
Interesting choice of action to go with. Last I talked with Krg is they are going to get caught up on the x-ray due to the new model release, and later possibly release the X-ray back half separately.
Well I've got a complete rifle. It was a comment to your "all their rear sections". Leaving out 1/3 of the production isn't all.

Ideally I would pick a W3 folder with enclosed forend for my 42, but that isn't an option. Yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bravo6
That’s like putting a $500 set of Chinese wheels on a Lamborghini.

as long as the chinese wheel is round.....then there isn't an issue. buying name brand wheels is pointless once you hit a certain age...and ive had multiple sets of volks, SSR's, CCW, etc.. (in a previous live i was known as GSRswapandslow on HT....)


its a great idea to add adjustability to a classic rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bravo6
as long as the chinese wheel is round.....then there isn't an issue. buying name brand wheels is pointless once you hit a certain age...and ive had multiple sets of volks, SSR's, CCW, etc.. (in a previous live i was known as GSRswapandslow on HT....)


its a great idea to add adjustability to a classic rifle.

The issue is rarely the roundness, the biggest issue is the runout with cheap wheels that makes the car feel like it’s going to explode at high speed from the vibrations. Or the shit material that will eventually crack around the hub area from the high heat transfer from braking. Or stress fractures from acceleration or cornering.

My point is that you don’t put cheap shitty wheels on a performance car, just like you shouldn’t put Tupperware stocks on high end rifles. I wouldn’t expect someone who considers Honda’s a performance vehicle to understand this though.
 
Has anyone tried this? The rear stock off of my Tikka KRG Bravo stock fits nicely on my TRG-22 and now I have adjustable cheek piece, has anyone else tried this and are there any downsides to using this versus the original stock?
The only disadvantage would be durability possibly. If you aren’t dropping behind enemy lines then I don’t see the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bravo6
The issue is rarely the roundness, the biggest issue is the runout with cheap wheels that makes the car feel like it’s going to explode at high speed from the vibrations. Or the shit material that will eventually crack around the hub area from the high heat transfer from braking. Or stress fractures from acceleration or cornering.

My point is that you don’t put cheap shitty wheels on a performance car, just like you shouldn’t put Tupperware stocks on high end rifles. I wouldn’t expect someone who considers Honda’s a performance vehicle to understand this though.

Considering i was running deep 10's, all motor in the mid 2000's.....id say thats performance oriented? Also...ive owned my fair share of v8's....last car was a CTSV.

My point is.....a rota has the same runout as a volk 99 times out of 100