AT&T hooking you up again

Gunfighter14e2

Gunfighter14e2

Hunter/trapper of Remora's
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 9, 2002
9,940
15,109
Lick skillet Alabama
eham.net
#1
  • Sad
  • Angry
Reactions: Howland, Milf Dots and CSTactical
#3
Well officially California has a data protection law that "could" put some hurt on AT&T. I guess we will see if the CA AG's office does something or if some lucrative consulting contracts and political donations make sure that this incident just fades away...
 
#4
AT&T fuckup? 2 years to admit it and try to fix it? shocker! i feel for AT&T customers since i am one. the techs that have had to come to the house to fix frequent fuckups have all been competent,good guys. if something horrible happens to the corp itself,great. all i have is land line and dsl so i guess my exposure is limited and i have seen nothing that makes me think i have been hit. i do check everything important daily and try and keep up the protection stuff i have. my bill is huge for not much,a marginal product/service.
don't and never will have a cell,social media,text or any digital shit that life in US doesn't force one to have. of course being on here makes one a target of other actors besides the nigerian prince.
 
Last edited:
#6
why CC not debit? have tried to min both but shop on line makes that imposs. fact is that on line,and yes includes amazon,has things fast that can't be found local in less than a month sometimes or at all. driving $s also plays into that. have to use debit for cash or FTF at bank. eg ammo. not what you want local and prices often 50% higher than on line.
at one time my daughter used an am express gold for literally everything. i do know my shit is out there everywhere. not too worried about passwords etc. a talented hacker or nsa can break anything so WTF?
if i can do something reasonable to be a smaller target,cool. still pay CC on line or FTF bank? seems that that goes to the same digital toilet as using web.
LMK.
 
#7
Frustrating when you get that letter in the mail from a business admitting we did not do enough to protect
your personal information. Then showing what a terrific company they are we have enrolled you in a credit
monitoring company, my question is, now that you have pimped me out to a third party company who are
they sharing my information with? Stop and think about it this is actually a back door to further erode privacy
sold to you as being for additional protection after you are victimized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46 and lash
#9
Gunfighter14e2 said:
Their warm & fuzzes never get old, does it? Or are the pocketing money, to sell your data? Not like it hasn't happened before,..

100percentfedup.com

Major U.S. Cellphone Provider Hit With Massive Data Breach, "Nearly All" Customers Impacted * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Danielle

AT&T disclosed a security breach of call and text data that impacts nearly all of its 100 million+ customers. “In […]
100percentfedup.com 100percentfedup.com
Click to expand...
I have a great idea! Let's put all the company's and our customer's sensitive data on "the cloud," which isn't a damned cloud at all! It's somebody else's freaking server to which they have full access and control! What could possibly go wrong?

SMFH! :oops:

What is the definition of insanity again? I forgot.

Oh yeah. It's doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

You would think that a communications company would budget in a few servers instead of outsourcing. On the scale which they generate and store data, it would certainly be more cost efficient. Especially if you challenge the accepted notion that the company has any need to store sensitive customer data, or even the need to aquire sensitive customer data.
 
#10
Howland said:
I have a great idea! Let's put all the company's and our customer's sensitive data on "the cloud," which isn't a damned cloud at all! It's somebody else's freaking server to which they have full access and control! What could possibly go wrong?

SMFH! :oops:

What is the definition of insanity again? I forgot.

Oh yeah. It's doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

You would think that a communications company would budget in a few servers instead of outsourcing. On the scale which they generate and store data, it would certainly be more cost efficient. Especially if you challenge the accepted notion that the company has any need to store sensitive customer data, or even the need to aquire sensitive customer data.
Click to expand...
All large corporations are mostly driven by accounting. Owning your own servers is both an asset and liability. Leasing or paying for a service is an expense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oneshot86
#11
Howland said:
........

You would think that a communications company would budget in a few servers instead of outsourcing. On the scale which they generate and store data, it would certainly be more cost efficient. Especially if you challenge the accepted notion that the company has any need to store sensitive customer data, or even the need to aquire sensitive customer data.
Click to expand...

I question that need. Once upon a time, in order for LEO to tap a landline, they needed a warrant. Now landlines calls are digitized and stored just like cell phone calls & texts. Now, all an officer has to do is ask the local AT&T branch nicely and whatever stored communications AT&T has gets handed right over. Whether that is legal or not, apparently doesn't matter, I see police cars parked behind the local AT&T store for hours at a time on a regular basis. The laws most definitely need updated, stop the mass storage, get better security for storage of data, and only use storage for saving communications AFTER a warrant has been issued. Fuck the Patriot Act.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howland, DannoXYZ, mosin46 and 1 other person
#12
Hacked? Sure. Third party “hacks” it and then hands the info to the .gov because they can’t legally do it themselves. It’s a contractor doing the spying for the government because that way it’s legal.

Just like NGOs and the illegal scums from around the world being let in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howland, DannoXYZ and mosin46
#13
papershredder said:
I question that need. Once upon a time, in order for LEO to tap a landline, they needed a warrant. Now landlines calls are digitized and stored just like cell phone calls & texts. Now, all an officer has to do is ask the local AT&T branch nicely and whatever stored communications AT&T has gets handed right over. Whether that is legal or not, apparently doesn't matter, I see police cars parked behind the local AT&T store for hours at a time on a regular basis. The laws most definitely need updated, stop the mass storage, get better security for storage of data, and only use storage for saving communications AFTER a warrant has been issued. Fuck the Patriot Act.
Click to expand...
but then what would we do with the wonders and workers of NSA?
 
#15
mosin46 said:
why CC not debit?
Click to expand...

If you dont know the answer, I cant help you...

Something about your money vs. the banks money... fuck the banks money because they dont give 2 fucks about fraud so they deserve to lose their money.

My Visa debit card has the Visa daily limit set at 0(zero for those that think a 0 is an O)... but I can get $1000 daily from an ATM machine(I personally have never had ATM fraud, its ALWAYS Visa fraud)...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DannoXYZ
#16
We tend to be more forgiving of incompetence & idiocy than of maliciousness. So lots of things are presented as “mistakes” when they really weren’t.

I’ve dealt with all major telco carriers as employee, contractor and had them as business customers and partners for over 20-yrs. Having touched their systems from inside and gone through process of making external connections for supporting them, I can tell you their security are at highest levels. Better than government and military. In fact, many of modern cybersecurity algorithms, protocols and procedures grew out of stuff Ma Bell had implemented over 40-yrs ago.

Nah, they had been selling off your data for profit for years. It’s coming back around because enough people had traced back source of leak to them and it would be extremely costly in class-action lawsuits and regulatory penalties. This “admission” is just CYA move to limit liability and expenses as much as possible.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Howland
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Accessories Arcteryx and Kuiu lot
Replies
1
Views
254
Sminja19
Sminja19
PatMiles
‘Data-driven’ social distancing lie implodes—what next?
Replies
10
Views
428
Atomic_Lobster
Atomic_Lobster
Enough Said
Range Report WHY GRAVITY BALLISTICS?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Baron23
Baron23
PatMiles
Police Perplexed: D.C. Carjackings Spike 111% After Lack of Prosecutions
Replies
38
Views
1K
Ronws
Ronws
gr8fuldoug
Optics Zeiss Binocular Sale
Replies
1
Views
102
db2000
db2000
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts