So much for the US being regulatorily constrained on new powder production.

Slides

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 17, 2020
363
226
Hunter Valley Australia
Just like an Aussie...day late, dollar short. Or..in this case...even later.

Do better, man. Try to keep up (with US).

Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 09.41.42.png

Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 09.44.07.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: Eddystone

Seems you lot just like to play the victim and make up stories about everything being too hard over there. wE cANt BuILd NEw PowDER facTOriEs BeCaUSe WOKE 😆

At only 70 million dollars I don't know why everyone doesn't do it.
 

Seems you lot just like to play the victim and make up stories about everything being too hard over there. wE cANt BuILd NEw PowDER facTOriEs BeCaUSe WOKE 😆
You have a gross misunderstanding of the issue. In the US and I am sure to some extent Australia the Environmental regulations are more stringent than in other parts of the world. In our case the emission limits for power plants, chemical plants, and refineries are more stringent than those in many EU countries. Those rules put those countries at a competitive disadvantage versus others. In addition it adds time to the permitting process which in many cases ranges into years. Unfortunately here the judicial process then begins with legal challenges that again ties the process up for additional time. Ultimately anyone putting money at risk is faced with the fact that in the best case the money is put at risk for a longer time with the prospect of recovery and the high cost of permitting and possible litigation drives any investor, public, private, venture to view the project as riskier. It also means that markets are more likely to change before any return can be realized.
 
You have a gross misunderstanding of the issue. In the US and I am sure to some extent Australia the Environmental regulations are more stringent than in other parts of the world. In our case the emission limits for power plants, chemical plants, and refineries are more stringent than those in many EU countries. Those rules put those countries at a competitive disadvantage versus others. In addition it adds time to the permitting process which in many cases ranges into years. Unfortunately here the judicial process then begins with legal challenges that again ties the process up for additional time. Ultimately anyone putting money at risk is faced with the fact that in the best case the money is put at risk for a longer time with the prospect of recovery and the high cost of permitting and possible litigation drives any investor, public, private, venture to view the project as riskier. It also means that markets are more likely to change before any return can be realized.
Excellent explanation, but I'm afraid it's wasted on a troll that's probably 15 years old and is just trying to get a reaction out of someone.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Slides and tinker

Seems you lot just like to play the victim and make up stories about everything being too hard over there. wE cANt BuILd NEw PowDER facTOriEs BeCaUSe WOKE 😆
You're a thickheaded dipshit aren't you?

WRE didn't start up last month. How many permits, environmental impact studies, licenses, and regulations were in play before this announcement?

(Not that I lend much credence to the opinions/speculations of sheep who willingly gave up just about all of their firearms anyway.)

Mike
 
I have pistols, shotguns and numerous rifles. I can literally shoot from my garage or verandah to set up rifles or load test.

I have worked in statutory roles on mine sites, in a National metrology laboratory and in mining regulation. I almost certainly know more about various environmental, operational licencing and explosives manufacture/magazine licensing/hazardous facility licensing and approvals than 99.9% of forum members here.
 
I have pistols, shotguns and numerous rifles. I can literally shoot from my garage or verandah to set up rifles or load test.

I have worked in statutory roles on mine sites, in a National metrology laboratory and in mining regulation. I almost certainly know more about various environmental, operational licencing and explosives manufacture/magazine licensing/hazardous facility licensing and approvals than 99.9% of forum members here.
Wow, you are quite the bore.
 
I have pistols, shotguns and numerous rifles. I can literally shoot from my garage or verandah to set up rifles or load test.

I have worked in statutory roles on mine sites, in a National metrology laboratory and in mining regulation. I almost certainly know more about various environmental, operational licencing and explosives manufacture/magazine licensing/hazardous facility licensing and approvals than 99.9% of forum members here.


But can you own an AR-15 without a license?

If no, then fuck off, subject.
 
I have pistols, shotguns and numerous rifles. I can literally shoot from my garage or verandah to set up rifles or load test.

I have worked in statutory roles on mine sites, in a National metrology laboratory and in mining regulation. I almost certainly know more about various environmental, operational licencing and explosives manufacture/magazine licensing/hazardous facility licensing and approvals than 99.9% of forum members here.
How many of those pistols are actually in your residence? I don't know all the ins and outs of Australian firearms regulations... But last I knew handguns were lawful to own if you were a member of a shooting club and the pistol stayed on club premises. (Perhaps that only applies to semi auto pistols and revolvers are exempt.)

How many of your rifles, shotguns, and pistols are registered with the state? You know, just in case the state decides to restrict ownership further they can come to your house and demand you surrender whatever they've outlawed lately.

You folks took a major buttfucking after the Port Arthur shooting... And you were foolish enough to believe the government would stop there. But your bureaucrats got nervous after the rumblings of the citizenry during COVID. So I suspect more restrictions will be handed down.

Perhaps you should worry about your own country before you come in here popping your beak about ours.

Mike
 
How many of those pistols are actually in your residence? I don't know all the ins and outs of Australian firearms regulations... But last I knew handguns were lawful to own if you were a member of a shooting club and the pistol stayed on club premises. (Perhaps that only applies to semi auto pistols and revolvers are exempt.)

How many of your rifles, shotguns, and pistols are registered with the state? You know, just in case the state decides to restrict ownership further they can come to your house and demand you surrender whatever they've outlawed lately.

You folks took a major buttfucking after the Port Arthur shooting... And you were foolish enough to believe the government would stop there. But your bureaucrats got nervous after the rumblings of the citizenry during COVID. So I suspect more restrictions will be handed down.

Perhaps you should worry about your own country before you come in here popping your beak about ours.

Mike

Don't worry, they'll make sure 'ole Slides is happy to kneel, lick their boot, and give into whatever the state demands:

MensChange1.jpg
 
Last edited: