Democrats Vaporize over $2.1 Billion in Losing Effort Against Donald Trump!

PatMiles

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 25, 2017
1,676
4,710

The Harris campaign and allied groups burned more than $2.185 billion trying to prevent former President Donald Trump from completing the greatest comeback in American political history, according to Open Secrets.


The Democrats’ losing effort comes even though the Harris campaign outraised the Trump campaign. From January 2023 to Oct. 16, 2024, the Harris campaign raised $997.2 million, while the Trump campaign raised $388 million.
The vast sum of spending does not include millions of dollars invested in smaller amounts by Democrat-allied organizations. The top organizations that spent $2.185 billion include:


  • Harris for President: $875 million
  • Future Forward: $621 million
  • DNC: $368 million
  • Harris Victory Fund: $321 million

Forbes outlined the Democrats’ spending:


The Harris campaign raised $97.2 million in the first half of October alone, while the Trump campaign raised only $16.2 million, after Harris shook up what was previously a more evenly matched cash race (Biden and Trump had raised $284.1 million and $217.2 million in total as of the end of June, respectively).
The Harris Victory Fund—which raises money for both Harris’ campaign and Democratic groups—raised $1.2 billion this election cycle, according to a FEC filing released on Oct. 24.


In the end, the Harris campaign and allied groups spent more than $2.185 billion trying to prevent former President Donald Trump from completing the greatest comeback in American political history, Bloomberg reported using Open Secrets data.
 

The Harris campaign and allied groups burned more than $2.185 billion trying to prevent former President Donald Trump from completing the greatest comeback in American political history, according to Open Secrets.


The Democrats’ losing effort comes even though the Harris campaign outraised the Trump campaign. From January 2023 to Oct. 16, 2024, the Harris campaign raised $997.2 million, while the Trump campaign raised $388 million.
The vast sum of spending does not include millions of dollars invested in smaller amounts by Democrat-allied organizations. The top organizations that spent $2.185 billion include:


  • Harris for President: $875 million
  • Future Forward: $621 million
  • DNC: $368 million
  • Harris Victory Fund: $321 million

Forbes outlined the Democrats’ spending:





In the end, the Harris campaign and allied groups spent more than $2.185 billion trying to prevent former President Donald Trump from completing the greatest comeback in American political history, Bloomberg reported using Open Secrets data.
Lots of that money went to the main stream media - how else is MSM going to stay solvent when 50+% of Americans will not watch it
 
How much went to all the celebrities that did advertising for her? They all made it look like they were doing PSAs but they were paid advertising. They are whores for money. I'm sure Beyonce and Swift were cheap....

I'm not convinced they were paid a dime. My bet is blackmail.
 
Even 2 billion was not enough to sell her ,many in her party knew that but no one had the balls to throw her under the bus like they did with brandon . They drove themselves into a deadend street with his "..........a woman of color....." selection of his VP although it helped get him elected it imho was short sighted . As much as they tried the image / king makers could not get enough polish on her to shine add to their woes she was a terrible learner for the task . well done trump well done you learned from last election
 
Will there be an investigation and charges of campaign finance irregularities/crimes?
Her very first election for San Francisco DA violated California’s campaign finance laws, which put a cap on $250,000. She raised over $600,000 in that “election”, which was really rigged by the CA DNC machine and Willie Brown.

No matter how high her heels go, or how low her head gets to work, the unaffiliated voters don’t care about such things and will vote you out when you screw up bad enough for them to be affected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
How much went to all the celebrities that did advertising for her? They all made it look like they were doing PSAs but they were paid advertising. They are whores for money. I'm sure Beyonce and Swift were cheap....
Exactly. Those endorsements weren’t genuine, they were selling themselves to the highest bidder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarnYankeeUSMC
They have also spent equal that or more in trying to virtue signal, shame, gaslight, and guilt trip the population into taking an experimental medical experiment with lethal and debilitating side effects. A little over half of the population NEVER bought into it. If you had remained pureblood through the last 3 years, their shit did not influence you in any way.

#TrueSigma
#RealSigma
 
They didn't "vaporize" the money at all.

It's the same EVERY election cycle.
Get all the money you can beg, scare or rustle up and then spend it on "campaign expenses" which go to all your buddies and such be they "news media", "advertising agencies", "endorsements" or whatever.
Then those guys all owe you big time later on, win or lose.

BOTH parties do it to the max.

It's all about money and power, and well money.

Around these parts the RINO party was well known for pretty crooked stuff for like if you did print jobs for folks in the primaries that were not "approved" by the party bosses, you are never getting any business again type thing. I'm sure the Donkey party does the same thing.

Part of why they hate Trump is Trump proved twice that you don't need 1 or 2 or 3 billion dollars to win.
 
Whats 10% of $2.1B?

I'm sure some of that 'campaign' money is earmarked for various hit squads and pallets of bricks.

Btw, anybody keeping an eye on Chuck Schumer?
 
I saw that Biance was paid $10 mill, Lozzo was paid $4 mill. Did not hear on any others.
Beyonce was allegedly paid 10M for one Texas appearance, that's not what they paid her for her support. They were handing out 50 K checks to anyone that would pulish their narrative on YouTube, Instagram, or TikTok. No Trump supporters were paid that I heard of.
 
Last edited:
They didn't "vaporize" the money at all.

It's the same EVERY election cycle.
Get all the money you can beg, scare or rustle up and then spend it on "campaign expenses" which go to all your buddies and such be they "news media", "advertising agencies", "endorsements" or whatever.
Then those guys all owe you big time later on, win or lose.

BOTH parties do it to the max.

It's all about money and power, and well money.

Around these parts the RINO party was well known for pretty crooked stuff for like if you did print jobs for folks in the primaries that were not "approved" by the party bosses, you are never getting any business again type thing. I'm sure the Donkey party does the same thing.

Part of why they hate Trump is Trump proved twice that you don't need 1 or 2 or 3 billion dollars to win.
Yup. Older strategists know whether a Presidential candidate has a chance or not. For the ones that don’t have a chance that cycle, they still beat the drums of fear and excitement to make the donors spill out millions, so they can go into the election and party coffers.

Trump is the only candidate I’ve gotten messaging from who said, “If you can’t afford it, don’t send me your money, but make sure to get out and vote.”

Sadly, we really could have used more money for Kari Lake’s campaign though and get another Senate seat. She really ticked off the RNC because she recorded that lobbyist/party manager telling her it wasn’t her turn, to sit out, and they would run her for something else later so she didn’t steal the air from their selected puppet.

The parties are utterly corrupt though as you describe. It isn’t about principle or anything the voters actually care about. They emotionally-trigger donors to feed their machines, pure and simple.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fig and W54/XM-388
What’s even funnier is that Trump came in ahead of time and under budget on the election.

He had $345 million, only spent $316 million.

They pumped billions into Kamala’s campaign and the unaffiliated voters didn’t know and didn’t care.

They only know:

Income relative to home prices, cars, groceries, insurance, utilities, and basic expenses are unaffordable for working class compared to the Trump years, where we had the best numbers in generations.

Biden/Harris White House embarrassed the US constantly on the world stage.

The third party joined team Trump, is RFK Jr., and Biden denied his Secret Service protection detail.

The DNC did a soft coup on a sitting US President, and installed a cackling wine mom as their candidate.

Pretty easy to see for the strategists that Kamala wasn’t going to win, but the spectacle of an Indian woman pretending to be a collard greens bathtub chef allowed them to make it rain from the donor class and stupid base.
 
The parties are utterly corrupt though as you describe. It isn’t about principle or anything the voters actually care about. They emotionally-trigger donors to feed their machines, pure and simple.
The parties are only corrupt if you assume they are interested in anything other than the party.

Parties exist for the party, not the People.

Nothing they do is corrupt in their eyes if it benefits the party.
 
Most likely a huge amount came from China, so the Dems would be favorable to them during the next four years. This was done through ActBlue, the dem money laundering machine.
The biggest donor was Google, just like in 2016 to Hillary. I read the Podesta emails like it was my job to do so, and Eric Schmidt committed $2.2 Billion to the Hillademoness.

Walz is obviously on the ChiCom payroll with all his 30+ visits there. Something is way off with that “guy”. I suspect the plan was to use his family as intermediaries for money-laundering like Bushes do with Neil, Kerry does with stepson Chris Heinz, Obama does with the stupid Bidens, including both James and Hunter.

Now this cabal of traitors is navel-gazing and scheming for the next cycle with the mid-terms, starting off with how they will cover for Kamala’s $20m debt.

iu


My question is, why did Google “only” give Kamala’s campaign $1 Billion vs what they gave to Hillary?
 
Spending $2 Billion on false promises and propaganda did not sway a population of citizens that have even the most basic understanding of cause and effect. They know that the past 4 years have destroyed their earning power, and recognize what 4 more years on this trajectory would result in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LRRPF52