I hunt on public land. I do not have a lease or any I am close to enough to borrow their land. My old high school mate keeps telling me we need to schedule to go west to his family's ranch in west Texas and from there, we could go after mule deer. What we are lacking is logistics and time away from work.
Anyway, on public land, it doesn't matter what section you like. Everyone has a crack at it.
One time, I found a spot that I liked. A bunch of downed branches and brush to my left looked like a good bedding area and the creek was to my right.
So, I set my gear down, set up the tripod and rifle and got really still.
And then looked up and noticed hunting sticks and harness on a tree. No one else was around and also, I did not move. If he came along, I might talk with him. Certainly, he was off checking other spots.
There is one difference of assigned places on public land.
Out west near Itaque and Turkey, Texas (south and east of Amarillo,) is a state park called the Caprock Canyon SP. Throughout most of the year, it is rugged camping only, no hunting.
But for about a week, it is closed down to the general public and set up just for rifle (general) season hunting for mule deer. And, for that, if you win, you show up the day you are supposed to be there for orientation and also, you will be assigned a compartment. A section of the park you can use and also, safe directions of fire. In fact, the description of the hunt usually points out these things. Be ready for icy winter conditions (high plains desert.) Rugged camping.
And be able to adequately shoot at least 200 yards in the wind. It really is a canyon and there is just rock and scrub brush. No trees to hide in or behind. The best you can do is hide behind a boulder or some bush and you cannot catch a mule deer by putting salt on his tail.
In all of the time I have hunted public land and encountered others, there was never once a squabble over a roosting spot.
In the case of the OP
@GrayRyder , I get the drift. And it is a valid point. Even though it is private land, there are no assigned compartments. The other hunter's son is asking a lot.
As for others talking about what is or is not real hunting, I think hunting from a stand 70 yards from an auto-feeder is just fine. Anyone who has done that knows the amount of work, time, and money that went into taking care of all that. I saw it through the experiences of someone I know.
So, one could stalk and that is also work. Minus the work of building and setting up a stand or blind and planting feed crops and browse and clearing lines of sight, etcetera.
Then there are outfitters. People who's job it is to care for land and herds and run off the predators. For about half the price or less of a lease, you get a whole weekend where you can get a buck, a doe, and a hog. And it is all taken care of. The harvest is taken to a place to process and they can send off your trophy to a taxidermist.
Guess what, it is still exiting and effective.
Yeah, they take you to stands and hides and blinds. They know where the deer a going. How is that bad?
What if I tell you exactly where I saw a deer, down to the GPS coordinates. All you have to do is go there and wait a while. Is that wrong? Is that not "real" hunting?