No, the 338 ARC is .445" Grendel/7.63*39 parent. The spectre is .421".Based on a 10mm Magnum &/or 6.8 spc.
You can use either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, the 338 ARC is .445" Grendel/7.63*39 parent. The spectre is .421".Based on a 10mm Magnum &/or 6.8 spc.
You can use either.
I,m wondering if 8 twist is sufficient if you want to shoot say 300 gr SMK subsonic?This 338 Spectre barrel has a 6.5 twist Hornady 338 ARC an 8 twist barrel.
I misunderstood his question- I thought he was asking about the Spectre.No, the 338 ARC is .445" Grendel/7.63*39 parent. The spectre is .421".
Spectre is based on 10mm Auto or SPC, not 10mm Mag.
No the 338 ARC is .441-442" the 338 Spectre is .421 to .422" head area diameter. Grindel vs 224 Valkyrie, 6.8 SPC, 10MM Mag pistol, or 30 Remington, cut to length. With a short case their water capacities are very close. With in a grain or two, with only .019" to .020" different in head diameter. How deep the bullet is seated will make a big difference in either case.Based on a 10mm Magnum &/or 6.8 spc.
You can use either.
No its Starline 10 mm magnum, which are perfect... no trimming just anneal for best results and run through your 338 Spectre FL die $68 per set. Use on all sub loads up to 300 gr SMK then switch to SR cases the highest velocity for supers. They are so cheap ya don't care of ya lose a few.View attachment 8548093
A 10mm Auto is too short to be the parent case of the .338 Spectre, which has a case length of 1.250.
338 Spectre | The Ballistic Assistant
www.theballisticassistant.com
The 8 twist is on the low end for subs with long 300 gr match bullets...a 7 twist should work according to Berger stability calculator.I,m wondering if 8 twist is sufficient if you want to shoot say 300 gr SMK subsonic?
Here is 300 gr SMK at 300 meters in minus 5 degrees Celsius from a 7 twist barrel:
View attachment 8547951
It’s not making a round hole, and if you look at several bullet holes in the same group, they’re entering whit different angles through the paper
View attachment 8547950
At this point they don’t group well either..
Has Hornady said publicly if they were going to release that bullet as standalone component in 2025 ?The 8 twist is on the low end for subs with long 300 gr match bullets...a 7 twist should work according to Berger stability calculator.
But that doesn’t matter if you're have trouble.
So try a shorter bullet like the 250 SMK to see if things improve.
Hornady’s 307 gr sub is likely much shorter and will stablize in a 8 twist. But none are available, yet.
Hornady will release components after they get factory ammo up and running. They always do ...just way late and huge shortages, just like all the rest of their cartridge introductions.. Their projected prices for cases is pretty high for such a tiny case.Has Hornady said publicly if they were going to release that bullet as standalone component in 2025 ?
You'd think not, but it took forever to get 6 ARC brass as a component when it came out... Supply chains and whatnot back then, but still.SURELY they aren’t dumb enough to withhold it.
The Berger stability calculator uses the miller formula which is not intended for subsonic speed. It’s useless for that application according to Litz. I have not tried the 250 gr SMK or the Scenar/Lockbase, but I have tried to cut down the 300 gr SMK in the lathe. I chopped off 6mm of the tip, ending up with a bullet that looks like Hornady subX in the front.The 8 twist is on the low end for subs with long 300 gr match bullets...a 7 twist should work according to Berger stability calculator.
But that doesn’t matter if you're have trouble.
So try a shorter bullet like the 250 SMK to see if things improve.
Hornady’s 307 gr sub is likely much shorter and will stablize in a 8 twist. But none are available, yet.
10 mm mag brass is available I just bought 500 rds, and formed it, and so is SBR SR brass.Because I'm not convinced of SBRs SR brass either. I think their brass may be soft but I haven't gotten through multiple firings on the 300 pieces I've bought to really see. And I think it remains to be seen how long SBR supplies it. They may have bought a huge batch from a brass manufacturer and it could be a one time availability. So If your option is to form it from also extinct 10mm Mag brass vs buying brass that you know is made from rifle brass a person should probably choose between the near identical cartridges based on brass quality and long term supply.
I checked the primer pockets on all these loads they appear as new after 1 firing with subs, and moderate loads, where they are giving excellent accuracy, with pistol primers, then checked the next batch from 2 days ago...all is good on the first loading, 300 gr SMK, 300 gr Maker, 272 gr FMJ plus a bunch of 200 gr Speer.I think that you may have to allow that this could be a "your mileage may vary" type of thing because my subsonic load is less than 9gr of Lil Gun with 300gr Makers and one firing of that load significantly weakened the primer pockets on the large pistol primer pockets SBR brass that I have. I don't think I could load it a third time in that brass.
Thanks for your work on this.Since I have 224 Valkyrie and 6.5 Grendel cases lying around....I decided to make 338 Spectre cases out of them.
The 224 Valkyrie is easy, trim to length, lube, & run through the 338 spectre FL die.
The 6.5 Grendel is a bit more involved for the average reloader.
Cut to length. Turn the sold head to size, blend out and recut extractor groove, lube, size in the FL 338 Spectre die.
Anneal and resize. It goes pretty quick with a lathe once set up.
So the 224 Valkyrie is really easy.
Both chamber in the rifle at the same die setting as the 338 Spectre brass.
For what it's worth, pressures jump pretty fast in this tiny case, so even tougher, harder case headed brass, might not increase velocity much but hang in there longer for a few more firings.
Not that this exists yet, but if NAS3 cases have up to 2% more powder capacity than brass, that might get another 40 fps or so on supers just thinking linearly.The 338 ARC and the 338 Spectre are almost identical, as I suspected earlier.
I jumped on the Spectre to check out these small cased 338s while waiting for 338 ARC reamer, brass etc.
Well the 338 ARC brass arrived, so let's compare it to the 338 Spectre I now have been shooting is very accurate.
Hornady brass is $104 per hundred, Spectra brass is $46 per hundres for SR primer or a bit cheeper for LP primered cases.
Here they are side by side.
The 338 Spectre holds 29.4 grs of H2O,
The 338 ARC holds 30.5 grs of H2O, probably increase a grain when fired, depending on chamber.
Maybe the ARC will have 25 to 40 fps more velocity with supers...but the difference is insignificant...but with good barrels the ARC should be accurate.
The Spectre has been around a long time over 10 yrs I believe.
The Spectre has a 6.5 twist and I have fired bullets from 160 to 350 grs in it.
Hornady has an 8 twist, that may make a difference with the long heavy 300 gr match bullets at sub velocities. Maker already makes a variety of sub and super expanding bullets for the 6.5 twist.
Their 165 gr super expanding is running 2100 fps in the Spectre 16" barrel and supposed expand around as low as 900 fps.
I've wanted to see a NAS3 case for the 6arc for some velocity gains. With the 6 arc gaining steam that could be a future possibility and converting it to 338 arc wouldn’t be too much trouble.Not that this exists yet, but if NAS3 cases have up to 2% more powder capacity than brass, that might get another 40 fps or so on supers just thinking linearly.
Slightly off topic, but if it folded, it wouldn't be compliant.Looks like CMMG is going to adopt it. Would be awesome if they did velocity testing with the factory subsonic load at the different barrel lengths.
I know I'll catch some shit for this, but I actually like the "compliant" version with the magpul SGA stock. Just wish it would fold to be more compact in a deer blind.
I figured, but a man can dreamSlightly off topic, but if it folded, it wouldn't be compliant.
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
I like the 338 Spectre for accuracy and super consistent velocities.
Just new formed 10 mm mag brass or 338 Spectre SR primed brass, loaded in a Dillion progressive, with just a powder measure.
Single digit S/D is the norm.
Outstanding for an AR 15 mag feed autoloader.
Especially when most all bullet powder combinations are like this... it's what is needed to keep from vertical stringing as range increases.
I have a 338 ARC reamer coming Friday, I could rechamber to 338 ARC.
The only problem is brass is pretty weak for supers as another has alluded to in 338 Spectre.... but for moderate supers and especially subs this barrel is a shooter.
These are loaded on a Dillon progressive press with auto powder dispenser, Lee dies and a Lee factory crimp dieNice! How are you approaching neck tension and/or crimping?
Here it is 375 / 338 Spectre! ...a 270 gr Speer seated out to give maximum powder space.You need to put your tinkering skills to the test and develop a 375 Spectre
I have shot the 350 gr Maker in the 338 Spectre, they came in at 824 fps with the powder I chose, a bit under what was predicted.I've formed a case and seated a 400gr Maker.
But validating the case capacity to push a 400gr subsonic bullet is the real test. Get a reamer made. Have dies made from a die reamer and blanks. Validate the case , size will work with powders to accurately push a 400gr Maker. That's the real deal. And not cheap.
The 375 Raptor and the 8.6 Blk are the same case one is longer but most of the volume is consumed by the bullet, making the resulting case volume close to the same "enough", that the powder charge would be very similar.Hmmm, that's interesting. My current subsonic load for 375 Raptor is 400gr Makers over 13.3gr Lil Gun. That gets me 1000fps in colder weather and 1040 in warmer weather. Maybe it's just the inherent variability of predictive models like QL and GRT but it would seem like it's saying that even with a much reduced case capacity from 375 Raptor to 375 Blackout (?) there's no reduction in powder charge.
One of my frustrations with 375 Raptor is just how loud it is. Mine is a bolt action with an integrally suppressed barrel and it sounds like a firecracker going off. I think generally the smaller the powder charge the quieter the suppressed shot, all other things being equal like suppressor and barrel length. Case in point , my 338 Spectre with a 300gr bullet and 8gr If Lil' Gun is noticably quieter than my 375 using 13gr of Lil' Gun. If you're using essentially the same powder charge to achieve the same velocity the gains to be realized from developing a nano-subsonic 375 cartridge may not be worth it.
That’s going to beat the steel hard when it hits.The Spectre case is 28.8 to 27.3 depending on the brass, LP or SR primer.
I recommend SR primer cases, they hand a bit more pressure. Or Valkyrie cases cut down.
So I loaded one slightly modified 350 Maker. Checked in the gauge.
Loaded in the chamber not the firing pin dent ....extracted from the chamber no problem.
Single load in AR 15... should be able to get 950 to 1100 fps.
Done for now, will load more and ahoot em.
I just fired some 338 Spectre "bore riders" (turned down part of the bullet nose to .3295" to seat the bullet out and add more powder capscity to this small case ) to fit the AR 15 single load, at 2.6"I think I'm going to send some 375-338 Spectre loaded dummy rounds off to a reamer manufacturer and have a reamer made. And buy a Magnus 375.
Heavier bullets carry energy further, drift less, and more mass on target at the same speed. It trumps 300blk all day every dayYeah, because we need to only gain 30 lbs. KE more over a 220 sub .300BLK after spending a few thousand dollars on new brass, dies, .338 Sub-X bullets, and a new barrel with a special twist rate & bolt... This is getting a bit on the retarded side.
Did everyone lose their boner for the 8.6 BLK already, despite it being a retarded idea to begin with? Then again, do we really expect anything more from Kevin? He always has to do something similar, but different, just to say "I did this..."
I mean, they'll probably sell a ton of these, but the sad reality is, it's nothing special, and if you want to shoot that size case, you might as well just buy some Hornady Sub-X ammo for your 7.62x39...It will cycle in an AK with a can on it just fine. At the functional distances you can shoot subsonic ammo to, there will be almost zero advantage to this or the 8.6 BLK over a .300 BLK... And the .300 BLK will actually have less drop and drift (lighter bullet, less RPM twist rate).
Trumps? No... But might have slightly better ballistics and KE. We're not talking about THAT much heavier bullets. Plus, don't forget larger diameter means more wind drag and more surface area for wind affecting flight at further ranges, despite the heavier weight, so you have to factor that in, as well.Heavier bullets carry energy further, drift less, and more mass on target at the same speed. It trumps 300blk all day every day
They’re doing a different barrel extension and bolt design like the KAC E3/Fosberry Shotgun approach.What extensions work best with 338 ARC? Standard 556 or something else?