Is 2025 Year of the MPVO? Two New 2-12s!

beetroot · Jan 11, 2025

Barely two weeks into the year we already have to new MPVOs:
-Primary Arms SLX 2-12x40
-Element Helix Compact 2-12x42: https://element-optics.com/product/helix-hd-compact-2-12x42/

Just a shame both are SFP with capped turrets, the Element even being MOA only....
Maybe 2026 will be the year MPVOs return to glory.

VandelayIndustries · Jan 11, 2025

You had me excited, then I read the SFP bit. It’s mind boggling how all these companies just keep fucking this up.

stanley_white · Jan 11, 2025

While I do not own it yet, I submit the Maven RS1.2 - 2.5-15X44 FFP with the SHR-MIL reticle has a ton of potential.

I have become more confident of this lately as when I asked, Maven advised me that with this reticle the center dot is .1 mil thick; every hash mark is .04mil thickness; the inner reticle (thinner) is .1mil; and the outer (thicker reticle) is .4mil.

This is essentially the 2.0 version of Leupold's .1 MRAD thick Illuminated TMR.

As such, I suspect this scope is VERY usable as a duplex at 2.5x; the hash marks are usable prone / static unlimited time / low stress at 7x; and the hash marks are usable positionally / timed / high stress at 9x.

-Stan

cc: @C_Does

white_rushin · Jan 11, 2025

H6xi still owns the market, those two options might work for hunters but not for the gas gunner demographic

beetroot · Jan 11, 2025

white_rushin said:
H6xi still owns the market, those two options might work for hunters but not for the gas gunner demographic

Maybe, seems like the Athlon Helos is just as popular, if not more.

st1650 · Jan 11, 2025

Swing and a miss again.

I’ll stick with the Helos 2-12 although I’d like a compact 3-18 for a 22ARC Dasher eventually.

Mj1995 · Jan 11, 2025

I wish vortex was still making the 3-18 razor. I didn't own one but always though it would be great for a small 6mm or a 22 cal.

Mcgivro · Jan 12, 2025

MPVO…You mean scope?

waveslayer · Jan 12, 2025

Mcgivro said:
MPVO…You mean scope?

Medium powered variable optic, verses a LPVO...

Mike Casselton · Jan 12, 2025

HPVO = High Powered Variable Optic (could also be Human Papaloma Virus Optic)

RHPVO = Ridiculously High Powered Variable Optic.

USAROHPO = Unbelievably Stupid And Ridiculous, Overly High Powered Optic

Soon to appear, the Hubble

Glassaholic · Jan 12, 2025

beetroot said:
Barely two weeks into the year we already have to new MPVOs:
-Primary Arms SLX 2-12x40
-Element Helix Compact 2-12x42: https://element-optics.com/product/helix-hd-compact-2-12x42/

Just a shame both are SFP with capped turrets, the Element even being MOA only....
Maybe 2026 will be the year MPVOs return to glory.

You lost me at SFP...

These are not the droids we were looking for

Glassaholic · Jan 12, 2025

stanley_white said:
While I do not own it yet, I submit the Maven RS1.2 - 2.5-15X44 FFP with the SHR-MIL reticle has a ton of potential.

I have become more confident of this lately as when I asked, Maven advised me that with this reticle the center dot is .1 mil thick; every hash mark is .04mil thickness; the inner reticle (thinner) is .1mil; and the outer (thicker reticle) is .4mil.

This is essentially the 2.0 version of Leupold's .1 MRAD thick Illuminated TMR.

As such, I suspect this scope is VERY usable as a duplex at 2.5x; the hash marks are usable prone / static unlimited time / low stress at 7x; and the hash marks are usable positionally / timed / high stress at 9x.

-Stan

cc: @C_Does

I think the Maven has more potential as a crossover scope than an MPVO. One of the criteria for an MPVO is that it be shorter in length and the RS 1.2 2.5-15 is quite long at 14". Also, the FOV is pretty narrow and some have said the Maven tunnels, compare these numbers to the Vortex PST II 3-15x44. I do like the SHR-MIL reticle, but did they really leave numbers off the left side of the horizontal... strange decision.

Kickin45 · Jan 12, 2025

I still think the USO T12 is the tits. I just wish they’d add illuminated center dot.

Glassaholic · Jan 12, 2025

Kickin45 said:
I still think the USO T12 is the tits. I just wish they’d add illuminated center dot.

Very short and light, but very narrow FOV has me concerned... GPO just came out with some super short designs as well, I wonder if they come off the same line?

Kickin45 · Jan 12, 2025

@Glassaholic Thats a distinct possibility. Lots of similarities.
The ts12 definitely has its limitations, as any ultra short scope does. But none of that has altered a single shot from my 18” AR 308 out to 600yrds.
It’s not ideal as you mention, but for the moment, without being able to do side by side testing, it tics my boxes. What’s interesting about the TS-12 is, at this time it’s an old design and no one to this point in my opinion, has been able to just completely wipe the floor with it.

Glassaholic · Jan 12, 2025

Kickin45 said:
@Glassaholic Thats a distinct possibility. Lots of similarities.
The ts12 definitely has its limitations, as any ultra short scope does. But none of that has altered a single shot from my 18” AR 308 out to 600yrds.
It’s not ideal as you mention, but for the moment, without being able to do side by side testing, it tics my boxes. What’s interesting about the TS-12 is, at this time it’s an old design and no one to this point in my opinion, has been able to just completely wipe the floor with it.

That's what matters most, that you're able to accomplish how you intend to use the rifle!

mattc51 · Jan 13, 2025

Really no reason for FFP in the Element. Only 2 drop down hashes doesn't give you a lot to choose from when zooming at different powers on FFP.

gr8fuldoug · Jan 13, 2025

st1650 said:
Swing and a miss again.

I’ll stick with the Helos 2-12 although I’d like a compact 3-18 for a 22ARC Dasher eventually.

GPO CENTURI 3-12x44i Super Compact G4i #RC420

Super Compact Technology at 9.9" long
SFP Capped ¼ MOA reset turrets
G4i illuminated I-Control reticle
GPObright lens coating technology
PASSIONdrop hydrophobic lens coatings
DOUBLE HD objective lens technology
Magnification throw lever

C_Does · Jan 13, 2025

stanley_white said:
While I do not own it yet, I submit the Maven RS1.2 - 2.5-15X44 FFP with the SHR-MIL reticle has a ton of potential.

I have become more confident of this lately as when I asked, Maven advised me that with this reticle the center dot is .1 mil thick; every hash mark is .04mil thickness; the inner reticle (thinner) is .1mil; and the outer (thicker reticle) is .4mil.

This is essentially the 2.0 version of Leupold's .1 MRAD thick Illuminated TMR.

As such, I suspect this scope is VERY usable as a duplex at 2.5x; the hash marks are usable prone / static unlimited time / low stress at 7x; and the hash marks are usable positionally / timed / high stress at 9x.

-Stan

cc: @C_Does

Howwwdyyyy. There is a gentleman here with one who has offered it to me to review. But Maven finally got back to me last week about sending me one to test out. Of course I went for the MIL's, and I also opted for the add on package so I can play with the rings and caps.

It is on the longer and heavier side, but I am not a stickler for length as long as it clears everything else on the rifle. I much more care about optical performance and tracking performance over some of the physical properties. But everyone is different, and some people like things that others dont. Simple as that.

The RS1.2 as a whole looks extremely promising. All it could really use is a locking elevation turret. If thats a deal breaker then check out the Tract Toric 2.5-15. On paper that and the RS look very similar. I would even hazard a guess that they share some DNA.

BJames · Jan 13, 2025

st1650 said:
Swing and a miss again.

I’ll stick with the Helos 2-12 although I’d like a compact 3-18 for a 22ARC Dasher eventually.

How does the helos track? It’s on my short list for a shorty 6.5 Grendel build in the works.

st1650 · Jan 14, 2025

BJames said:
How does the helos track? It’s on my short list for a shorty 6.5 Grendel build in the works.

They track really well in my case. I’ve tested it to 20mils multiple times on my subsonic 300blk. Tracks true and return to zero fine. That said, apparently on rokslide the dude who does the drop test says the zero shifts on impacts. You’d have to ask him is his last one still does it, he hasn’t updated his post. I haven’t seen any one complain about those but I doubt most people run their gear as hard as he does. He did say the triji Tenmile 3-18 had no issues with the drop test so I’m tempted to try one if I find one at the right price, I’m usually not a Trijicon fan except for the Acog and the Sro.

Athlon Helos BTR Gen2, 2-12x42mm Field Eval

This is a field evaluation of the Athlon Helos BTR Gen 2, 2-12x42mm scope. This scope was handed to me from from Ryan Avery for evaluation. It was sent to him from a forum member. The ammunition used was Hornady Black 168gr AMAX that was purchased by Ryan. The 20 round proof group was just over...

rokslide.com

stanley_white · Jan 14, 2025

C_Does said:
Howwwdyyyy. There is a gentleman here with one who has offered it to me to review. But Maven finally got back to me last week about sending me one to test out. Of course I went for the MIL's, and I also opted for the add on package so I can play with the rings and caps.

It is on the longer and heavier side, but I am not a stickler for length as long as it clears everything else on the rifle. I much more care about optical performance and tracking performance over some of the physical properties. But everyone is different, and some people like things that others dont. Simple as that.

The RS1.2 as a whole looks extremely promising. All it could really use is a locking elevation turret. If thats a deal breaker then check out the Tract Toric 2.5-15. On paper that and the RS look very similar. I would even hazard a guess that they share some DNA.

Great news!

I am very interested to see the reticle at 2.5x against a woodland background if are able to do so.

-Stan

Tikkaguy · Jan 15, 2025

C_Does said:
Howwwdyyyy. There is a gentleman here with one who has offered it to me to review. But Maven finally got back to me last week about sending me one to test out. Of course I went for the MIL's, and I also opted for the add on package so I can play with the rings and caps.

It is on the longer and heavier side, but I am not a stickler for length as long as it clears everything else on the rifle. I much more care about optical performance and tracking performance over some of the physical properties. But everyone is different, and some people like things that others dont. Simple as that.

The RS1.2 as a whole looks extremely promising. All it could really use is a locking elevation turret. If thats a deal breaker then check out the Tract Toric 2.5-15. On paper that and the RS look very similar. I would even hazard a guess that they share some DNA.

I have the tract 2.5-15, I belive they are basically the same scope. It’s a nice little scope, it was on a spr type 556 but it ended up being a little long so I put it on a 22 build instead. Great glass, build quality and eye box. Just a little small in the image department for what I needed on a spr. Doesn’t weigh too much either. Reticle is nice and clean and at 2.5 there is no problem finding the ret. 20 mils on a 40 moa base for my 22 lr. Could use a little more travel but it’s a 30mm tube after all.

Tikkaguy · Jan 15, 2025

Mj1995 said:
I wish vortex was still making the 3-18 razor. I didn't own one but always though it would be great for a small 6mm or a 22 cal.

The weight makes it near useless on any rig that’s mobile. Same as any non lvpo razor

Glassaholic · Jan 15, 2025

Tikkaguy said:
The weight makes it near useless on any rig that’s mobile. Same as any non lvpo razor

I agree, the biggest issue with the RG2 3-18 was not the glass (as even today it is pretty amazing), but the weight was more than anyone wanted for either a gas gun or crossover platform. This is most likely why Vortex has not yet introduced an RG3 version of this scope which is unfortunate. Would love to see an RG3 3-18x50 that is around the 30oz mark, I know a lot would want less weight but that's not really the RG3 line so something competitive with the ATACR 4-16 is within reason. What would be even better is a new AMG somewhere around 3-18 that was under 30oz... been waiting for that scope for about a decade (when the AMG 6-24 was announced I really hoped a mid-power optic would follow as I felt 6x at the bottom was a wee bit too much for crossover use even for western hunters, but that didn't stop me from putting it on my 7mm SAUM rig for elk and long range steel).

Tikkaguy · Jan 15, 2025

Glassaholic said:
I agree, the biggest issue with the RG2 3-18 was not the glass (as even today it is pretty amazing), but the weight was more than anyone wanted for either a gas gun or crossover platform. This is most likely why Vortex has not yet introduced an RG3 version of this scope which is unfortunate. Would love to see an RG3 3-18x50 that is around the 30oz mark, I know a lot would want less weight but that's not really the RG3 line so something competitive with the ATACR 4-16 is within reason. What would be even better is a new AMG somewhere around 3-18 that was under 30oz... been waiting for that scope for about a decade (when the AMG 6-24 was announced I really hoped a mid-power optic would follow as I felt 6x at the bottom was a wee bit too much for crossover use even for western hunters, but that didn't stop me from putting it on my 7mm SAUM rig for elk and long range steel).

Yeah I agree 100% the razors are good scopes but the weight is a no go for all of them for me personally . And the lht version isn’t very attractive to me either. I feel like they made the razor line heavy on purpose for prs type comps. The Germans manage to build scope in that quality bracket in a sensible weight most of the time! Come on vortex!

C_Does · Thursday at 8:44 PM

Tikkaguy said:
I have the tract 2.5-15, I belive they are basically the same scope. It’s a nice little scope, it was on a spr type 556 but it ended up being a little long so I put it on a 22 build instead. Great glass, build quality and eye box. Just a little small in the image department for what I needed on a spr. Doesn’t weigh too much either. Reticle is nice and clean and at 2.5 there is no problem finding the ret. 20 mils on a 40 moa base for my 22 lr. Could use a little more travel but it’s a 30mm tube after all.

That sounds just like the maven rs1.2 I just got. My limited experience with is is mostly positive. The fov and view through it seem to be on the tighter side but boy does the glass look stellar.

Tikkaguy · Thursday at 8:52 PM

C_Does said:
That sounds just like the maven rs1.2 I just got. My limited experience with is is mostly positive. The fov and view through it seem to be on the tighter side but boy does the glass look stellar.

Yeah it’s an impressive scope, would make a great crossover scope for a lighter bolt action. They seemed to really do about everything right. For the price it’s really doesn’t get enough attention

wvfarrier · Friday at 5:53 AM

I believe trijicon is releasing a compact 3-9 optic this year. IIRC is about the size of an lvpo

Macht · Friday at 6:10 AM

wvfarrier said:
I believe trijicon is releasing a compact 3-9 optic this year. IIRC is about the size of an lvpo

Pretty sure you mean Eotech. Or maybe they're both launching one.

Tikkaguy · Friday at 12:33 PM

I’m more interested in the primary arms plx 2.5-20x48, no new yet but supposed to be comming out soonish. See if it would be a better fit than the nx8

wvfarrier · Friday at 12:57 PM

Macht said:
Pretty sure you mean Eotech. Or maybe they're both launching one.

Yer right it was eotech, my bad

AleksanderSuave · Saturday at 4:00 PM

Glassaholic said:
I think the Maven has more potential as a crossover scope than an MPVO. One of the criteria for an MPVO is that it be shorter in length and the RS 1.2 2.5-15 is quite long at 14". Also, the FOV is pretty narrow and some have said the Maven tunnels, compare these numbers to the Vortex PST II 3-15x44. I do like the SHR-MIL reticle, but did they really leave numbers off the left side of the horizontal... strange decision.
View attachment 8589981

View attachment 8589982

I have both of these. The maven in some ways feels cheaper. Maybe its the zero stop or the turrets. Cant quite put my finger on it. I actually have all 3 vipers, one in the LPVO, and the other in the higher zoom option. I have a feeling the reason vortex introduced the newer Viper HD is to compete more in the "hunting" category as it has always been an for that use, but never quite the perfect fit.

I have the mil reticle on the maven. On low power it sucks. hard to read. Outside of that its a pretty decent scope. Oddly feels heavy despite the published weight. Might have to weigh mine to see if their 26 oz is accurate. I could have sworn mine was closer to 28 when I checked it.

The vortex Razor HD LHT, while being only SFP, I think has a better mil reticle, beats it reasonably on weight, and has better daylight and low-light image quality than any of the of the others compared here, which combined with the weight and reticle, makes it subjectively a better hunting scope..sucks they only make a FFP version of it in 4.5-22x. It would be a knockout in the lower power.

C_Does · Saturday at 6:50 PM

The lht 3-15 is a Superb hunting optic.i bought one to review and leant it to a friend to throw on his 308 hunting rifle. He absolutely loves it. Very simple controls,very good glass.

I just got a maven rs1.2 in. On the outside it's very nice.and on my scale @AleksanderSuave it is 26oz almost exactly. But it does feel a bit heavier. I think it'll fit the bill as a crossover scope moreso than anything else. I haven't done anything more than play around with it however.

AleksanderSuave · Saturday at 7:10 PM

C_Does said:
The lht 3-15 is a Superb hunting optic.i bought one to review and leant it to a friend to throw on his 308 hunting rifle. He absolutely loves it. Very simple controls,very good glass.

I just got a maven rs1.2 in. On the outside it's very nice.and on my scale @AleksanderSuave it is 26oz almost exactly. But it does feel a bit heavier. I think it'll fit the bill as a crossover scope moreso than anything else. I haven't done anything more than play around with it however.

What do you think of the reticle in the lowest magnification setting?

Tikkaguy · Saturday at 8:15 PM

Glassaholic · Saturday at 9:16 PM

Tikkaguy said:

If price is close to NX8 not sure how well it will compete, most would prefer NF on the side vs PA even if the PA is "better". PA could have done themselves a favor and designed a reticle that works at 2.5x, unless this is selling for significantly less than the NX8 not sure how excited the community will be. At least they dropped the chevron for a dot but those tree reticles are way too busy IMO, might as well get a Horus at that point. Buy I do like the DECA reticle so that could be decent. Cartridge turret sounds interesting but wish they would have gone with lower profile for piggyback RDS. Was going to do a sample variance test with several NX8's later this year so might be good to include this in the mix.

I do wish PA would have stayed with 6x erector and refined optical performance, these scopes are short and I'm betting they're finicky, why push 8x and short these days???

but I get it, they want something that sells so why not mimic NF... Most of the world has no clue what makes a good optic and like DSLR'S simply think more megapixels is better so bigger erector must be better... Ugh! :step off soapbox:

Tikkaguy · Saturday at 9:21 PM

Glassaholic said:
If price is close to NX8 not sure how well it will compete, most would prefer NF on the side vs PA even if the PA is "better". PA could have done themselves a favor and designed a reticle that works at 2.5x, unless this is selling for significantly less than the NX8 not sure how excited the community will be. At least they dropped the chevron for a dot but those tree reticles are way too busy IMO, might as well get a Horus at that point. Buy I do like the DECA reticle so that could be decent. Cartridge turret sounds interesting but wish they would have gone with lower profile for piggyback RDS. Was going to do a sample variance test with several NX8's later this year so might be good to include this in the mix.

I do wish PA would have stayed with 6x erector and refined optical performance, these scopes are short and I'm betting they're finicky, why push 8x and short these days??? but I get it, they want something that sells so why not mimic NF... Most of the world has no clue what makes a good optic and like DSLR'S simply think more megapixels is better so bigger erector must be better... Ugh! :step off soapbox:

I agree, curious how it all works out. If I were to buy one I would get the simple mil ret and I dont know how useable it would be on the bottom. Time will tell how bad the exit pupil and glass gets at 20x. Hope it’s at least on par with the nx8

C_Does · Saturday at 10:23 PM

AleksanderSuave said:
Glassaholic said:

If price is close to NX8 not sure how well it will compete, most would prefer NF on the side vs PA even if the PA is "better". PA could have done themselves a favor and designed a reticle that works at 2.5x, unless this is selling for significantly less than the NX8 not sure how excited the community will be. At least they dropped the chevron for a dot but those tree reticles are way too busy IMO, might as well get a Horus at that point. Buy I do like the DECA reticle so that could be decent. Cartridge turret sounds interesting but wish they would have gone with lower profile for piggyback RDS. Was going to do a sample variance test with several NX8's later this year so might be good to include this in the mix.

I do wish PA would have stayed with 6x erector and refined optical performance, these scopes are short and I'm betting they're finicky, why push 8x and short these days??? but I get it, they want something that sells so why not mimic NF... Most of the world has no clue what makes a good optic and like DSLR'S simply think more megapixels is better so bigger erector must be better... Ugh! :step off soapbox:

Click to expand...

Man those are words after my own heart. PA Should of stuck with a 6x multiplier. But unfortunately, horsepower sells cars like WIDE magnification ranges in far too small of a scope sells for scope companies...

AleksanderSuave said:
What do you think of the reticle in the lowest magnification setting?

So far Im really liking it. The scaling is really good. I can see why someone earlier was upset about the left hand side windage holds not having numbers over the stadia lines. It isnt the end of the world. For a simple yet usable reticle, its far better than much of the competition.

white_rushin · Sunday at 1:00 AM

Crazy, I had the same thoughts as you all after watching their overview video. I don’t really see how PA is differentiating themselves in any meaningful way from the NF NX8 with this PLXC 2.5-20. I would guess they’re likely going to price it around $1500-$1600, but people can still find used NX8s for around that cost.

The type of person that will buy this PA model also likely knows the NX8 2.5-20 also exists. It seems to be just as compact and the same weight. Really their marketing will need to be that you get a 34mm tube for no extra weight penalty and locking turrets.

Will that be enough for people to not pick NF’s proven reputation and perceived durability? I’m not sure.

I really think PA had a chance to do something special with a killer PLXc 2-12x or 2-16x if they really wanted to differentiate themselves and stick with an 8x erector. Or they could’ve done a more budget friendly GLX 2.5-20x for sub $1K to get an entire new buying demographic.

C_Does · Sunday at 1:15 AM

white_rushin said:
Crazy, I had the same thoughts as you all after watching their overview video. I don’t really see how PA is differentiating themselves in any meaningful way from the NF NX8 with this PLXC 2.5-20. I would guess they’re likely going to price it around $1500-$1600, but people can still find used NX8s for around that cost.

The type of person that will buy this PA model also likely knows the NX8 2.5-20 also exists. It seems to be just as compact and the same weight. Really their marketing will need to be that you get a 34mm tube for no extra weight penalty and locking turrets.

Will that be enough for people to not pick NF’s proven reputation and perceived durability? I’m not sure.

I really think PA had a chance to do something special with a killer PLXc 2-12x or 2-16x if they really wanted to differentiate themselves and stick with an 8x erector. Or they could’ve done a more budget friendly GLX 2.5-20x for sub $1K to get an entire new buying demographic.

I could not agree more. I talked to the CEO of PA when I first reviewed the plxc. I asked "do you have any plans to make a 1m5-12 or a 2-18 using this architecture?" The response, "we don't see the market."

I think it's yet another big swing and a miss. At least companies like Vector are listening. Their Continental 2-12 is what this plxc should be.

db2000 · Sunday at 9:21 AM

st1650 said:
Swing and a miss again.

I’ll stick with the Helos 2-12 although I’d like a compact 3-18 for a 22ARC Dasher eventually.

I just ordered a Helos 2-12 for my 8.6 Blk. $399 out the door from Doug. I have the 4-20 and 6-24. Both are very impressive at their price point. Besides being Chinesium, I haven’t found other fault with them.

Bart · Sunday at 9:34 AM

I am just waiting for the 2-12 to be released!
Has anyone seen the new Contentintal 3-18 in the wild? If so, how does it stack up against the Mark 5?

Glassaholic · Sunday at 9:44 AM

C_Does said:
I could not agree more. I talked to the CEO of PA when I first reviewed the plxc. I asked "do you have any plans to make a 1m5-12 or a 2-18 using this architecture?" The response, "we don't see the market."

Unfortunately I think that's how most manufacturers see it, too much risk, they want the low hanging fruit so they copy what's already popular.

C_Does · Sunday at 6:00 PM

Bart said:
I am just waiting for the 2-12 to be released!
Has anyone seen the new Contentintal 3-18 in the wild? If so, how does it stack up against the Mark 5?

Vector SAYS itll become available tomorrow. If so Ill be dropping my review on it. There will be a code in the description and top comment for 10% off.

C_Does · Sunday at 6:01 PM

Glassaholic said:
Unfortunately I think that's how most manufacturers see it, too much risk, they want the low hanging fruit so they copy what's already popular.

Yup. I get it, its a business thats all about making money first. It just sucks that there isnt anywhere near as much innovation as there should be,.

PappyM3 · Sunday at 6:09 PM

white_rushin said:
…The type of person that will buy this PA model also likely knows the NX8 2.5-20 also exists. It seems to be just as compact and the same weight. Really their marketing will need to be that you get a 34mm tube for no extra weight penalty and locking turrets.
…

It’s a quarter pound heavier than the NX8. 32.4oz vs 28.3oz

Bart · Sunday at 6:10 PM

C_Does said:
Vector SAYS itll become available tomorrow. If so Ill be dropping my review on it. There will be a code in the description and top comment for 10% off.

Damn, C- thanks!

bobke · Sunday at 6:16 PM

Is Amazon the only place to buy Vector Optics?

C_Does · Sunday at 6:21 PM

bobke said:
Is Amazon the only place to buy Vector Optics?

Nope. https://vector2007.com/?ref=CDoes Use code C_DOES for 10% off your entire order.

Having trouble using the site?

Site updates coming Wednesday, 1/29 at 8am CT!

Is 2025 Year of the MPVO? Two New 2-12s!

Old Salt

Gunny Sergeant

If it ain’t broke, you can’t resist.

Sergeant of the Hide

Old Salt

Private

Professional shithead

Private

212

No, I just wear the T-shirt

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Jack of all

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Jack of all

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Private

Supporting Vendor

Supporter

Supporter

Private

If it ain’t broke, you can’t resist.

Supporter

Supporter

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Supporter

Supporter

Supporter

Ignorant wretch

Sergeant of the Hide

Supporter

Ignorant wretch

Gunny Sergeant

Supporter

Gunny Sergeant

Supporter

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Supporter

Supporter

Sergeant of the Hide

Supporter

Supporter

Private

Optical theorist and conjecturer

Supporter

Supporter

Sergeant of the Hide

Private

Sergeant

Supporter

Similar threads