I looked at Jura as well when I was buying my Oracle Touch, and was nearly sold on them. I went to try out their machines and was not impressed with the milk based drinks, like lattes or cappuccinos. It was like something you'd get in the waiting room at a car dealer.
The Oracle does substantially better milk foam. With a bit of practice it's within spitting distance, IMO, of what a coffee shop would produce.
You also have more control over the espresso brew in terms of pre-infusion time, brew time, grind size, grind dosing with the Oracle; or you can set it for the beans you're using and just press "Go".
IMO, I'd keep the machine you have, or upgrade to an Oracle Touch for greater convenience, rather than going to Jura. If you have a Williams-Sonoma store near you, you can basically go in and demo them and try the end results.
They are two different things. Breville doesn't make a "super-automatic". With the one-touch you are still barista-ing. That said, there's no question you have more control doing it with a steam wand, and you can make "better" foam with a wand by doing it longer, which is sort of not an option with a true super-automatic, as it's feeding the milk into a stream of steam rather than bringing the steam into a volume of milk. The espresso, on the other hand, isn't any better, because from grinding the beans into chunks or into dust you get exactly what you program and the machine to do, and it does it as well as any human can do it manually. The cakes that it spits out go from crumbly to solid. It will make it however you want it.
Jura is completely programable (both for a single serving, and changing the product parameters) from the grind, to the length of infusion, to the temperature of both the coffee and the milk, to the level of foam in different drinks (based on how it feeds and how many seconds it fills). That said, if you like foam you don't get to tailor it to your level of frothiness. I tend not to like foam at all, and just prefer the milk to be as hot as the coffee.
I agree that with the manual machines you have the control of a chef, and can make it exactly how you like it. You can have the highest end professional manual machine for what the super-automatics cost, and that is the way to go if you don't mind preparing it yourself (which I don't). The wife on the other hand demanded she be able to press a button, and you pay through the nose for that. If it weren't for that I'd definitely go with the Breville or a Rocket. Thank God they don't drink cold-brew for another grand.
If you want it exactly like Starbucks you can't buy one, because Manstrena doesn't sell them to anyone but Starbucks, but you can get several Italian ones for the home (the Oracle among them) that get too close for any mortal to tell. The call them "automatic" machines, but they're not one touch because they still manually froth the milk. Obviously this has not been completely figured out in the Super-Automatics. It probably will be.
There is a review site that I've used to choose this time and in the past:
https://www.coffeeness.de/en/best-super-automatic-espresso-machine/
I'd only caution that every review is more of a commercial, and he really doesn't have anything bad to say about any of them. So take any of his tepid comments that aren't positive as real criticisms.
These things wear out like cars. They only run for so many miles. The Pico Barista that I had shit the bed at about six years, and that was running it for at least six, and probably more like ten cycles every day. It made thousands and thousands of cups, and I think I paid $1,700 for it before Covid. It was a great deal at the end of the day. Then again, I've got a tin pot, perker (with the glass bulb on the lid) from my grandfather that makes great campfire coffee that he probably gave $.50 in the 1940s. $30-$40 today. Hopefully this Jura lasts longer...
