One Piece Scope Mounts ..What do you use?

Normally, Spuhr 4603B (NF BEAST) but recently switched one rifle over to Badger Ordnace C1 Max rings, they feel solid but light and appear to be rock solid.
 
Anyone using Eratac? I know it's a pretty niche use for ELR, and you can just get 20 MOA built in to your mount and rail, and most scopes have plenty of internal travel, but... I want my current scope (maxes at ~18 MRAD on a 20 MOA rail right now) to be able to take me out to a mile more often without having to pull my ATACR off my .22.
 
I have a recently-acquired Tier One cantilever QD and I'm impressed. You can buy it sans QD and add it later if you so desire. Diving board option as well. Beyond that, ARC M-Brace is pure awesome and I have their new lightweight version arriving hopefully soon. I pre-ordered with a January delivery but so far, no mount. I have a few Scalarworks but no dive board, 0 MOA only, ADM's, Badgers, etc...prefer the Tier One and M-Brace for versatility. Oh and the Primary Arms PLX mount. Bad ass for the money and rock solid while being one of the lightest offerings out there.

Tier One. The precision is over the top and their QD is buttery.
IMG_7130.jpg
 
The 419 one piece mount looks good, but it appears to me that you need two different torx bits, 20 and 25. OK not a major deal, but why? If not for that, I would probably get one or more. Now the Gray Ops is looking like my next mount.
Nope, the fastners are all T20. Interested to know where you saw the T25 so I can correct it.
 
When are you gonna correct the stickers on the cases? 😆 The mounts are engraved 45in-lbs.
When we cycle through the packaging. Initially when we made the mounts we set a lower number to be conservative. Over ongoing testing and abuse, the 45in-lb number gives greater security with no downside. We make rolling improvements, however small, on products constantly. It's actually typically faster (since we make our own products, and don't just farm stuff out) for us to make a change like that engraving than a packaging change (we are not a pack/print shop).
 
When we cycle through the packaging. Initially when we made the mounts we set a lower number to be conservative. Over ongoing testing and abuse, the 45in-lb number gives greater security with no downside. We make rolling improvements, however small, on products constantly. It's actually typically faster (since we make our own products, and don't just farm stuff out) for us to make a change like that engraving than a packaging change (we are not a pack/print shop).


Craig,

Glad we are bringing Area 419 on board :) - Richard
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyer1a
When we cycle through the packaging. Initially when we made the mounts we set a lower number to be conservative. Over ongoing testing and abuse, the 45in-lb number gives greater security with no downside. We make rolling improvements, however small, on products constantly. It's actually typically faster (since we make our own products, and don't just farm stuff out) for us to make a change like that engraving than a packaging change (we are not a pack/print shop).
We are talking about 45in lbs on the fasteners to the base?
 
We are talking about 45in lbs on the fasteners to the base?
That's correct, this is for the base/rail connection, NOT the caps. The caps are still listed (and will continue to be listed) at 18 in-lb, though if you use the 20 in-lb Fix-It Stick you'll not hurt anything.