• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

Reeeee!!! from DOD trannies imminent

#14
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn and powdahound76
#16
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...
Found the simp
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Yasherka, GreenGO Juan, Lange Carabine and 15 others
#17
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...
You are cuntsistent anyway. Maybe you should fuck a tranny....in your logic if they can cum to your rescue, what's the difference.....right??
 
  • Haha
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, Big Phish and 232593
#18
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...

Females should not be in combat roles, not because the vast majority are unsuited to it physically and mentally, but because it violates God's natural order of things.

Also, you indicate that you appreciated having women in situations that compromised their safety because it was easier for them to then justify shooting an American citizen? You are a piece of shit.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn, Steel+Killer and 6 others
#19
More than 100 freaks were fired from the NSA yesterday after their chat room was exposed.

The fucking perversions in there were apparently off the charts…. And it was what these LGBTQ employees did all day instead of keep America safe. DEI mandated, too.

This was what they were hiring to protect us…. Perverted garbage…

Sithr
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn, 79steeler and 4 others
#21
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...
Combat
Psychological reasons.
Young men have been taught to protect the girls/women.
This ^^^ will impede their performance when things go shitty.

R
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka, Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn and 3 others
#22
I had 13 years in when I got my first "you can't call everyone a 'fag' anymore" class (because DADT had just been repealed). I knew at that point, that we were in for a bad slide regarding standards and general fortitude. It was a struggle to keep my mouth shut for another 8 years.

Trannies are just fag's who need more attention because being a fag now doesn't get you that...that is what happens when you normalize deviant behavior...the next generation is going to have to become more over the top to get the 'bravery points'. I fear it is already happening with the the push to accept MAP bullshit.

That is why I can't accept even the little snowball of deviant behavior, because I know that it is just teetering at the top of a large hill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn, Steel+Killer and 5 others
#23
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement,...

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...


Because it actually does matter.

If a pilot can't carry out his duties properly, planes get crashed.

If the maintainer can't troubleshoot, repair or service an aircraft properly, pilots and people die.

If the Army water specialist can't provide clean, potable water, grunts get sick and can die from it.

If the artillery pukes can't put rounds on target, they can kill their own troops.

Etc, etc, etc...

It goes on and on.
Being a cop isn't the same as being in the military.
If military people can't or don't do their jobs properly people fucking die from it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sean the Nailer, Lange Carabine, armorpl8chikn and 4 others
#24
My opinion. The reasons for disallowing trannies in any military role are much more obvious than for women and gays. Gender Dysphoria is a recognized mental disorder and the medical costs plus recovery and post op care of surgeries are more than enough reason. Women and gays could still find a place to serve, just not in infantry combat roles. Plenty of support positions to fill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Phish
#25
diggler1833 said:
I had 13 years in when I got my first "you can't call everyone a 'fag' anymore" class (because DADT had just been repealed). I knew at that point, that we were in for a bad slide regarding standards and general fortitude. It was a struggle to keep my mouth shut for another 8 years.

Trannies are just fag's who need more attention because being a fag now doesn't get you that...that is what happens when you normalize deviant behavior...the next generation is going to have to become more over the top to get the 'bravery points'. I fear it is already happening with the the push to accept MAP bullshit.

That is why I can't accept even the little snowball of deviant behavior, because I know that it is just teetering at the top of a large hill.
Click to expand...


First, the proper place to display maps is right up against the nearest wall...


I was a very active subject of the Women In Special Operations Review that SOCOM did. I could and probably should write a book about all the dishonesty, lies, deciet, and arrogance that the aforenamed program was riddled with.

I joined a military that banned fags and said women couldn't be in combat roles. I left one that was a shell of its former self.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, Hecouldgoalltheway and 4 others
#27
Mike Casselton said:
Because it actually does matter.

If a pilot can't carry out his duties properly, planes get crashed.

If the maintainer can't troubleshoot, repair or service an aircraft properly, pilots and people die.

If the Army water specialist can't provide clean, potable water, grunts get sick and can die from it.

Of the artillery pukes can't put rounds on target, they can kill their own troops.

Etc, etc, etc...

It goes on and on.
Being a cop isn't the same as being in the military.
If military people can't or don't do their jobs properly people fucking die from it.
Click to expand...
And if you can’t trust the man to your left & right because they are degenerates prone to doing degenerate shit unit cohesion fails.

Can you imagine being in leadership talking about good order and discipline within an organization that allows/embraces fudge packing & dudes thinking they are girls?
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Yasherka, Marinevet1, armorpl8chikn and 2 others
#28
MK20 said:
I joined a military that banned fags and said women couldn't be in combat roles. I left one that was a shell of its former self.
Click to expand...

Yep, we got our first woman (and coincidentally our first open lesbian) in our battalion about a year before I retired. I almost put her on blast the first time I saw her, because I thought she was a scrawny little dude who didn't get a haircut over the weekend.

I got my first female in my company (I was the ops chief at that point) about 4 months before my retirement. Within two months, probably 30 different dudes in the barracks had banged her. That isn't an exaggeration.

I've been so disillusioned about what my beloved 'Corps turned into that I've never worn a single "USMC" item in the nearly seven years since my retirement (*exception for the company t-shirt in my avatar photo...the boys gave that to me as part of my going away gifts). It and one of my deployment unit sweaters I still wear with pride (the non-gay kind of pride).
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, Bender and 232593
#29
diggler1833 said:
I had 13 years in when I got my first "you can't call everyone a 'fag' anymore" class (because DADT had just been repealed). I knew at that point, that we were in for a bad slide regarding standards and general fortitude. It was a struggle to keep my mouth shut for another 8 years.

Trannies are just fag's who need more attention because being a fag now doesn't get you that...that is what happens when you normalize deviant behavior...the next generation is going to have to become more over the top to get the 'bravery points'. I fear it is already happening with the the push to accept MAP bullshit.

That is why I can't accept even the little snowball of deviant behavior, because I know that it is just teetering at the top of a large hill.
Click to expand...

MAP is a made up commie term for pedophile

Using the term MAP, like gender instead of sex, helps normalize it


Rhetorical question, if one is opposed to homos and trannies because it is deviant behavior, is that same person opposed to hook ups, random 1 nighters, and/or watching porn?
Seems like one level of deviant behavior is accepted and on is not.

Im not defending either or pushing for acceptance of the gay/tranny/pedo anything.

And will openly admit before I found the Lord, I was the wildest of the wild as a straight dude.
And still struggle in my brain regularly.

No women in combat.
No trannies in military.
For any job with a PT test, standards must be the same across the board. Anything else creates danger and is a liability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka and 232593
#30
powdahound76 said:
Rhetorical question, if one is opposed to homos and trannies because it is deviant behavior, is that same person opposed to hook ups, random 1 nighters, and/or watching porn?
Seems like one level of deviant behavior is accepted and on is not.
Click to expand...

Rhetorical answer: Yes.

I used to think otherwise, but that was back before I really put my faith an understanding elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: powdahound76
#31
diggler1833 said:
Rhetorical answer: Yes.

I used to think otherwise, but that was back before I really put my faith an understanding elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Me too.

Funny, lotta people think a guy who is hip deep in beautiful women would miss it. (Work in a big hospital full of attractive 20s and 30s wimmerns).
Actually, just wish I would have found it sooner!

And Im more like their older brother or dad (in a not Arkansas way!)
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka, Sean the Nailer, 232593 and 1 other person
#32
powdahound76 said:
Me too.

Funny, lotta people think a guy who is hip deep in beautiful women would miss it. (Work in a big hospital full of attractive 20s and 30s wimmerns).
Actually, just wish I would have found it sooner!

And Im more like their older brother or dad (in a not Arkansas way!)
Click to expand...

Yessir, I chased tail for many, many years in my youth. I finally found what I was looking for all those years in a beautiful Christian woman, and a very "traditional" relationship/marriage.

If I could trade all those years of fruitless behavior for years with my wife, I would, in a heartbeat.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Sean the Nailer, Lange Carabine, 232593 and 2 others
#33
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...
Fag.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, Bender and 2 others
#35
B y r o n said:
When I was in law enforcement, there were those that believed the women didn't belong in patrol. My viewpoint was if I was getting beat on or threated in any other way, I didn't care who came to my rescue. There were males who wouldn't be there but there were females who would. In fact females could more easily justify the force they used to overcome a suspect compared to a male. I didn't have an issue with anyone who was willing and able to do the job.

Why should the military be any different? In other words, it shouldn't matter if the individual is able to carry out the duties they are assigned. Better than keeping individuals that will retreat instead of taking appropriate action when it is required.
Click to expand...
You have obviously never been in the military. It's not the same thing. I've never seen a single woman finish a ruck march exceeding 4 miles carrying her own pack. Never. Someone goes down, they are useless. They can't lift a grown man from the ground, none of them, no matter how big they are. They can't do the job. They should be relegated to support roles. They shouldn't be patrol cops either, and I can show you a thousand videos to explain why.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, Bender and 2 others
#36
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
You have obviously never been in the military. It's not the same thing. I've never seen a single woman finish a ruck march exceeding 4 miles carrying her own pack. Never. Someone goes down, they are useless. They can't lift a grown man from the ground, none of them, no matter how big they are. They can't do the job. They should be relegated to support roles. They shouldn't be patrol cops either, and I can show you a thousand videos to explain why.
Click to expand...

No no no. According to our beloved Mr Byron, women should indeed be patrol cops so they can get in situations that would be easily handled by a man, but which threaten them as women so they can have a justification to shoot the American citizen.

Women officers make it easier to murder the offender. Don't you see?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, Bender and 1 other person
#37
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
You have obviously never been in the military. It's not the same thing. I've never seen a single woman finish a ruck march exceeding 4 miles carrying her own pack. Never. Someone goes down, they are useless. They can't lift a grown man from the ground, none of them, no matter how big they are. They can't do the job. They should be relegated to support roles. They shouldn't be patrol cops either, and I can show you a thousand videos to explain why.
Click to expand...
Wrong again, 82nd Airborne, 20 years before DADT!
 
#40
B y r o n said:
Qualified for OCS during testing but turned it down. MOS 43E2P is what I was assigned after volunteering to go airborne.
Click to expand...
What do you mean you "qualified for ocs during testing"?

If you have a bachelor's degree and are otherwise fit to be in the army, you qualify for OCS.

You also have an mos assigned before you ship to basic, so.... no. And what do you mean you "volunteered to go airborne"?
Like in bct? You would have been assigned an mos long before you would have had an opportunity to "volunteer for airborne".

You sound like you know just enough to get by with your lying when you're talking to people who don't know what you're talking about.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn and Bender
#41
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
What do you mean you "qualified for ocs during testing"?

If you have a bachelor's degree and are otherwise fit to be in the army, you qualify for OCS.

You also have an mos assigned before you ship to basic, so.... no. And what do you mean you "volunteered to go airborne"?
Like in bct? You would have been assigned an mos long before you would have had an opportunity to "volunteer for airborne".

You sound like you know just enough to get by with your lying when you're talking to people who don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

Let me enlighten you:

"To qualify for Officer Candidate School (OCS), a candidate typically needs a minimum score of 110 on the General Technical (GT) section of the ASVAB test."

My score was above the 110 and was offered to apply for OCS. It would have extended my enlistment so I turned it down.

When you're drafted you don't have an MOS before going to basic. Halfway through basic someone came out and gave a presentation on being airborne and I said yes. When orders were passed out at the end of basic, my orders took me to Fort Benning for jump school then Fort Lee for riggers school, you have to be jump certified prior to attending rigger school.

Maybe you need to realize that what you think you know may not always been that way and actually may longer be.
 
#43
B y r o n said:
Let me enlighten you:

"To qualify for Officer Candidate School (OCS), a candidate typically needs a minimum score of 110 on the General Technical (GT) section of the ASVAB test."

My score was above the 110 and was offered to apply for OCS. It would have extended my enlistment so I turned it down.

When you're drafted you don't have an MOS before going to basic. Halfway through basic someone came out and gave a presentation on being airborne and I said yes. When orders were passed out at the end of basic, my orders took me to Fort Benning for jump school then Fort Lee for riggers school, you have to be jump certified prior to attending rigger school.

Maybe you need to realize that what you think you know may not always been that way and actually may longer be.
Click to expand...
Drafted? How long ago are we talking about here? You said earlier "20 years before DADT". Now I have no idea what "DADT" means, but when someone uses an acronym online that I've never seen, I naturally assume they are young. What is DADT?
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: Sean the Nailer and Bender
#44
IMG_2075.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Yasherka, armorpl8chikn, 232593 and 1 other person
#45
Hecouldgoalltheway said:
Drafted? How long ago are we talking about here? You said earlier "20 years before DADT". Now I have no idea what "DADT" means, but when someone uses an acronym online that I've never seen, I naturally assume they are young. What is DADT?
Click to expand...
Don’t Ask Dont Tell. Bill Clinton’s way of letting the soddomite camels nose in the tent.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Im2bent, Hecouldgoalltheway and Bender
#49
B y r o n said:
Let me enlighten you:

"To qualify for Officer Candidate School (OCS), a candidate typically needs a minimum score of 110 on the General Technical (GT) section of the ASVAB test."

My score was above the 110 and was offered to apply for OCS. It would have extended my enlistment so I turned it down.

When you're drafted you don't have an MOS before going to basic. Halfway through basic someone came out and gave a presentation on being airborne and I said yes. When orders were passed out at the end of basic, my orders took me to Fort Benning for jump school then Fort Lee for riggers school, you have to be jump certified prior to attending rigger school.

Maybe you need to realize that what you think you know may not always been that way and actually may longer be.
Click to expand...

Byron in the army and qualifying for OCS......he coulda been a general..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hecouldgoalltheway
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Trump to Remove Transgenders from Military on Day One
Replies
26
Views
669
Death From A Distance
Death From A Distance
sirhrmechanic
Get ready... the beaners, tranny's, leftists and commies are about to strike back... .
Replies
21
Views
865
260shooter
2
sirhrmechanic
Hegseth is off to a great start!
Replies
5
Views
617
sirhrmechanic
sirhrmechanic
_Windrider_
Military Trannies don’t have to deploy.
Replies
27
Views
1K
UKDslayer
U
Milf Dots
State of Montana Takes Custody of Daughter After Transgender Claim
Replies
12
Views
788
supercorndogs
supercorndogs
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts