• Contest Ends TOMORROW! Last Chance to Enter to Win a $2k RIX Thermal Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is subscribe and add a picture of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Which thing made the biggest difference?

Getting seating force right ... due to a combination of (a) Annealing, (b) FL Bushing Sizing, (c) Mandrel, (d) NeoLube #2, and finally (e) my Amp Press. Making mistakes up-stream are super hard to find if you don't actually know the force it takes to seat a bullet. Taking the guesswork out of that with my AMP Press allowed me to optimize those upstream adjustments to give me the seating force and neck tension that really optimized my reloads.
 
Getting seating force right ... due to a combination of (a) Annealing, (b) FL Bushing Sizing, (c) Mandrel, (d) NeoLube #2, and finally (e) my Amp Press. Making mistakes up-stream are super hard to find if you don't actually know the force it takes to seat a bullet. Taking the guesswork out of that with my AMP Press allowed me to optimize those upstream adjustments to give me the seating force and neck tension that really optimized my reloads.
Now you got me thinking. I was only thinking of seating force as a product of the neck tension but I guess annealing would make a difference too for how hard the brass fought the expanding of pressing the bullet in.
What’s the lube for? Using it on the necks for sizing?
 
I have a structured barrel made by Kreiger treated by Tacom HQ
blueprinted chamber reamed for a specific load ( comparator length and COAL ) for exact bullets I plan to use …..to the exact measurements I was going to use with the exact bullets ( a range of ) I was going to use reloading

Then
Notes. Keeping track of conditions wind and temp etc

Shoot regularly ( weekly )

Enjoy the facts good or bad

Shooting is not called grouping and or hitting targets for a reason

It is shooting

I love going out and enjoying shooting for what it is and surprising self with solid impacts is super fun

This rifle above? Groups well at all ranges and compared to my .22 lr? It is better than I am….. but shooting .22 out to 300-500 yards is the same

Attitude and effort
 
Now you got me thinking. I was only thinking of seating force as a product of the neck tension but I guess annealing would make a difference too for how hard the brass fought the expanding of pressing the bullet in.
What’s the lube for? Using it on the necks for sizing?
I use NeoLube #2 on the inside of the case necks prior to my mandrel step, and leave the residual there to aid in bullet seating. Works great for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter

Barrel, bullet, and shooter. And good SD (Fx120 scale). And avoid temp sensitive powders. Well, all of the above^, really
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
For me after getting more experience the improvements become smaller(and more expensive) in nature. It can be different things for different cartridges. For my 300 WM just switching to Lapua brass made a noticeable difference. Sometimes It is a surprise. Imperial Sizing Wax made an instant improvement for sizing and shoulder bump. The more you shoot the better everything gets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
Personally, the more I reload, the more I come to the conclusion that (at least for modern high quality bullets, brass, etc.,) many of the things people obsess over in reloading don't actually matter/do anything.
In my experience, your bullet, primer, powder combination has the biggest impact on group size. The right primer is mainly important for velocity consistency. Everything else (e.g. seating depth, charge weight, primer pocket uniforming, weight sorting brass, volume sorting brass, etc.,) is basically a waste of time, in my experience. That said, maybe some of these things are important for certain bullets types or certain brass. I personally haven't seen it.
The truth is that most modern "load development" methods consist of shooting a single 3 or 5 shot group with some parameter at a certain value and comparing it to other 3 or 5 shot groups with various values of that parameter. This is statistically insignificant data and there's no way it can be used tell if one powder charge weight, seating depth, etc., is better than another.
 
Last edited:
I used to run cleaned up Federal brass then moved to Lapua. I saw no major difference in ES or SD from the brass change. I do save more time not cleaning up brass which was the point. I do use the mandrel, with NeoLube, after bushing sizing. It takes only a few minutes to use the mandrel so, with costs going up, I figure I might as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
Personally, the more I reload, the more I come to the conclusion that (at least for modern high quality bullets, brass, etc.,) many of the things people obsess over in reloading don't actually matter/do anything.
In my experience, your bullet, primer, powder combination has the biggest impact on group size. The right primer is mainly important for velocity consistency. Everything else (e.g. seating depth, primer pocket uniforming, weight sorting brass, volume sorting brass, etc.,) is basically a waste of time, in my experience. That said, maybe some of these things are important for certain bullets types or certain brass. I personally haven't seen it.

Primers, you tune with the powder and bullet combo. Seating depth will have a huge influence in accuracy. You can see it as you change the seating depths. But I agree with the other stuff like sorting brass, bullets ect, one can probably not shoot the difference. But for sure, seating depths you can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
Primers, you tune with the powder and bullet combo. Seating depth will have a huge influence in accuracy. You can see it as you change the seating depths. But I agree with the other stuff like sorting brass, bullets ect, one can probably not shoot the difference. But for sure, seating depths you can.
Yes, I agree that primers you tune with the powder and bullet combo. I was mainly trying to say, in my experience, your primer has little impact on group size at close range (assuming the primers are consistent and not total crap). In my experience primers mainly affect the consistency of your velocity. The OP asked about ELR, so, yes, your primer, bullet, powder combination would be very important then.

Personally, I haven't seen seating depth make any significant/noticeable difference in group size. It may just be the bullet types I have used aren't sensitive to seating depth though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
I'm getting more and more about consistency as a whole. I think the fancy processes are good, but more beneficial in sports like benchrest where you win or lose by very small margins. I spend way less time loading than I used to but my ammo shoots every bit as good as it did before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVshooter
Biggest improvement for me was stop obsessing over the infinite micro details and just shoot more.

I load my match ammo on a Hornady lnl ammo plant using a case feeder. Stressing less about the ammo and shooting more because loading is less of a chore has made me a significantly better shooter!

With that out of the way. Quality components purchase in bulk so that you don’t have the possibility of different lots messing with you would be my advice.
 
Spending a few hours with a professional shooting coach, total of three visits.My reloads were not the limiting factor.

GAP rifle, Lapua brass, 175 SMK, FGMM primers, RL15, RCBS charge master scale, coax press, Redding competition dies. I used gauges and precision measuring tools to measure everything, set the dies, and check every loaded round.

I am certain there are better shooters and reloaders who could take it to the next level.
 
Last edited: